Government reorganizing, downsizing just don’t mix

  • David Broder / Washington Post columnist
  • Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — President Bush’s proposal for creation of a Cabinet-level Department of Homeland Security includes much that is sensible policy and a few ideas that are plain silly. Congress needs time to sort it out.

Bush’s embrace of the proposal to consolidate in a single place the separate agencies that have responsibility for safeguarding our borders — the Coast Guard, the Customs Service, the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Border Patrol — has been welcomed by former Sens. Warren Rudman and Gary Hart, whose bipartisan commission recommended that step well over a year ago. Linking those units with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which leads the national response to disasters, makes sense also to Sen. Joe Lieberman and Rep. Mac Thornberry, the bipartisan pair who have been pressing such legislation in the face of White House opposition that has suddenly vanished.

A more generous president might have given credit to these and other foresighted officials, rather than seeking to create the impression that it was his staff who came up with this brilliant scheme. Rudman, a New Hampshire Republican, exaggerated just a little when he told me, "They basically tore the cover off our report and made it a White House document."

Pride of authorship aside, almost all the national security experts I have interviewed said the intent and broad design of the massive reorganization plan is sound in concept — but difficult to accomplish. It can be improved by suggestions from those the White House task force excluded — Cabinet officials, public administration experts and members of Congress. The presidential goal of having the new department up and running by Jan. 1 is less important than avoiding the mistakes that have cropped up in past reorganization efforts.

I.M. "Mac" Destler of the University of Maryland, co-author of a forthcoming article on homeland security for The National Interest quarterly, cautioned that "experience shows that putting things into the same agency does not always coordinate them." Ivo Daalder of the Brookings Institution, his collaborator, pointed out that "25 years after we created the Department of Energy, we still have no national energy policy." That department is notoriously a collection of separate fiefdoms — not a coherent whole.

It is disquieting to some of these experts that, in his belated rush to respond to the growing criticism of intelligence failures before 9/11, Bush put his reorganization plan ahead of the homeland defense strategy Tom Ridge is expected to present next month. It would make sense for Congress to tell Ridge and the president, "We can better judge your organization scheme if we know what your strategy for protecting the nation will be."

For example, if the FBI is to make deterrence of terrorists its main mission, as Director Robert Mueller’s own reorganization plan implies, then should it not be a central part of the new Homeland Security Department? Gary Hart suggests splitting the FBI’s personnel and resources between a new homeland intelligence agency and a smaller FBI within the Justice Department, which would continue to work on bank robberies, drug cases, etc.

Hart would do the same thing with Customs, the Coast Guard and the rest, moving only those functions and people related to homeland security into the new department, while not burdening that department with tasks that do not make the nation any safer. Such a division of labor might satisfy some of the objections forcefully voiced by Rep. David Obey and other Appropriations Committee Democrats, who worry that routine but important government functions will be downgraded in this massive reorganization.

And speaking of massive, the silliest part of the president’s proposal is the claim that a new department can be run with fewer people and less money than its constituent agencies. The Clinton-Gore "reinventing government" initiative lost its focus, and much of its potential benefit, when spurious claims of personnel cuts became its driving force. Bush should learn from their example.

If there is going to be a new department with 170,000 people, accept that it will have a superstructure of its own. The Department of Education, the smallest Cabinet agency, with fewer than 5,000 employees, at last count had a secretary, a deputy secretary, an under secretary, eight assistant secretaries, 12 deputy assistant secretaries and innumerable directors and assistant directors — all with their own staff support.

Reorganization makes sense. But reorganizing and downsizing all at once is certain to fail.

David Broder can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - In this Friday, Oct. 4, 2019, file photo, a man using an electronic cigarette exhales in Mayfield Heights, Ohio. On Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2019, the American Medical Association said it is calling for an immediate ban on all electronic cigarette and vaping devices. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak, File)
Editorial: Shut down flavored tobacco’s gateway to youths

Legislation in Olympia would bar the use of flavors and menthol in vape products and cigarettes.

Herald report of Everett protest inaccurate, biased

I was at the rally and protest in Everett last on Feb.… Continue reading

Media shouldn’t use ‘she’ for trans people

About 79 percent of Americans oppose those observed male at birth from… Continue reading

USAID freeze halts vital aid work

I am outraged the Trump administration is making the U.S. weaker in… Continue reading

Goldberg: Trump declares war on higher ed, not just woke parts

The move, aided by Elon Musk, to gut NIH funding, is part of a larger and debilitating attack on academia.

Comment: Trump’s Kennedy Center will narrow exposure to art

Trump’s move to takeover the Kennedy Center is not about the arts but about celebrating his tastes.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Rivian, based in Irvine, Calif., has introduced its new R2 models, smaller and more affordable SUVs. (Rivian)
Editorial: Open electric vehicle market to direct sales

Legislation would allow EV makers to sell directly to customers, making lease or purchase easier.

Comment: No one saw Musk’s DOGE rampage coming or its threat

With no formal grant of authority, Musk is making cuts without fully understanding the consequences.

Douthat: Trump is chasing off lawyers he’ll need at some point

The deal to clear Adams serves Trump only as a way of identify whom he can consider loyal in the DOJ.

President Donald Trump listens alongside Elon Musk as he explains the administration’s cost-cutting efforts in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, on Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025. Musk has for weeks posted on social media about government spending, often amplifying and seeding false information. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)
Comment: This crisis can’t be left to courts alone

The courts can uphold the law, but they can’t match the speed of the executive branch in tearing down systems.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.