Hagel’s ouster may signal escalation in Iraq, Syria

When Barack Obama looks in the mirror these days, he must see a terrifying visage staring back at him: that of George W. Bush.

In a cruel echo of history, Obama is morphing into the president whose foreign policy he campaigned to overturn. Obama on Monday morning sacked his Pentagon secretary, Chuck Hagel, after huge midterm election losses in the sixth year of his presidency, just as Bush did in sacking Donald Rumsfeld after midterm losses in the sixth year of his presidency.

As with Bush, the ouster comes as a war in the Middle East is going badly — then, the Iraq war, now, the bombing of the Islamic State terror group. Rumsfeld’s ouster led to the surge in Iraq, and Hagel’s departure comes amid signs of an expanded role for U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria. And, as under Bush, this guarantees that Obama will leave his successor an ongoing U.S. war in the Mideast, quite possibly the sort of ground war Obama vowed to undo.

The neocons who dominated the Bush administration feel some vindication watching Obama struggle to avoid repeating history. Dov Zakheim, a Bush-era Pentagon official, said Hagel was offered up as a “sacrificial lamb” by a White House trying to stall further escalation in Syria and Iraq. But “I just don’t think they have that luxury” of avoiding an expanded U.S. role, he said. “They’ll agonize as long as they possibly can, but the clock is ticking a lot faster than they anticipated.”

White House officials insisted Hagel and Obama “arrived together” at the decision for Hagel to leave, but the stagecraft suggested it wasn’t voluntary — a hastily arranged event in the State Dining Room with just 20 people seated in two rows (a smattering of top White House officials, Cabinet officers and military types) providing exaggerated applause after Obama offered effusive praise of the man he was dismissing with no successor named.

Hagel’s departure speech, pulled from his left breast pocket, said everything you need to know about why Obama agreed with Hagel that “it was an appropriate time for him to complete his service.” Hagel thanked the president and the vice president, his colleagues and the generals, the troops, Congress, his foreign counterparts and his family. But he made not a single mention of the war against the Islamic State.

Hagel listed his accomplishments — the pullout from Afghanistan, strengthened alliances, reforms within the Pentagon — but said nothing about the renewal of war in the region that has bedeviled the U.S. for decades.

And that almost certainly is the real reason behind Hagel’s departure. The Republican former senator, a decorated veteran and the first enlisted man to hold the top job at the Pentagon, was brought in to help Obama wind down wars and shrink the Pentagon. His strong ties to the military and his reluctance to use force (he came to oppose the Iraq surge) made him an ideal man for the job, and his battle wounds from Vietnam gave him the moral authority to answer the chicken hawks who opposed the contraction of the military.

But now Islamic militants have taken over much of Iraq and Syria, and even Jimmy Carter has said the Obama administration was too slow in responding. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has begun to float the idea of ground troops. Even recovering isolationist Rand Paul has called for a declaration of war. Obama, whether he likes it or not, is going to need a Pentagon chief to oversee this war he doesn’t want to fight.

Obama went on at great length about the “class and integrity” of the “great friend” he was pushing out the door, praising Hagel for everything from drawing down U.S. forces in Afghanistan to working to reduce sexual assaults.

Only in passing did Obama mention the war that threatens to dominate the last two years of his presidency. He said Hagel “helped build the international coalition” to fight the Islamic State and praised Hagel for his work on reshaping the military to “meet long-term threats while still responding to immediate challenges.”

Hagel, a man of peace, can now at least enjoy the Thanksgiving holiday, knowing he’ll be free of this new war once the Senate confirms a successor — no doubt after many I-told-you-so’s from Republican hawks about the Islamic State.

For Hagel’s boss, being dragged into expanding just the sort of war he was elected to end, there is no such relief.

Dana Milbank is a Washington Post columnist.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Monday, Sept. 25

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Randall Tharp’s month recovery coins after battling a fentanyl addiction.  (Kevin Clark / The Herald)
Editorial: Fentanyl crisis should force rethinking of approach

A continuum of care, that includes treatment in jails, is imperative, says a journalist and author.

Comment: Carrying Narcan requires having compassion for addicts

The stigma around fentanyl addiction remains a barrier to its availability to treat those overdosing.

Comment: If AI ‘writers’ were human, they would have been fired

A series of stories, written by AI, have embarrassed news sites and raised questions about their use.

Comment: Murdoch’s out; not his legacy of ‘alternative facts’

The Fox News creator’s formula for laundering right-wing narratives as news lives on without him at the helm.

Fact check: No, migrants aren’t getting $2,200 a month from U.S.

A viral tweet by Rep. Lauren Boebert is a zombie claim that started in 2006 in Canada.

Flowers bloom on the end of a dead tree on Spencer Island on Monday, Aug. 28, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Restore salmon habitat but provide view of its work

Comments are sought on a plan to restore fish habitat to the island east of Everett with popular trails.

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Sept. 24

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - In this Jan. 16, 2015, file photo, pumpjacks are seen operating in Bakersfield, Calif. On Friday, April 23, 2021, California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced he would halt all new fracking permits in the state by January 2024. He also ordered state regulators to plan for halting all oil extraction in the state by 2045. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong, File)
Comment: If ‘peak oil’ is ahead why is oil industry doubling down?

Fossil fuel use could peak by 2030, but Big Oil may be putting profit ahead of prudent transition.

Most Read