Hard but defensible choice on death penalty

Te trial for the two young men charged with brutally murdering Rachel Burkheimer isn’t underway yet, but proponents of the death penalty might have felt a sense of defeat Wednesday when Snohomish County Prosecutor Janice Ellis announced she will not seek the ultimate punishment for John Phillip Anderson and John Alan Whitaker.

Even the headlines conjured feelings of defeat for some — "Pair to dodge death penalty," as if Anderson and Whitaker, through their own wits or luck, had slipped through society’s fingers.

However, if convicted, the two will spend the rest of their lives in prison without the possibility of release. Whatever side you fall on in the hotly debated issue of capital punishment, full justice is being sought by our county’s law enforcement officials.

It’s easy for some to label Ellis’ decision as solely financial or the result of politics, but there’s so much more behind such a weighty call. Ellis provided a detailed and well-justified account of her rationale to the public just moments after the decision was announced. After detailing the costs of such a trial, she made the critical point that in the penalty phase the state must prove "beyond a reasonable doubt that there are not sufficient mitigating circumstances to spare the defendant’s life." That’s not an easy thing to do given the events in some people’s lives.

By now, everyone has heard of the controversy surrounding the OK Boys Ranch and that Anderson was an 11-year-old boy living there when the scandal broke that the boys were being beaten and sexually assaulted. Even if a jury decided Anderson deserved death, the penalty phase would no doubt be appealed and played out again, as it has been with other cases here.

Putting aside this strong consideration, Ellis effectively argued that this case presents other difficulties: the motive for murder is unclear, jurors will be asked to decide guilt "based in part upon the testimony of co-defendants who have already pled guilty" and there is no "independent, corroborating evidence, such as DNA, to support the expected testimony." All of these are well-grounded reasons that support the final, difficult decision.

The decision to not seek the death penalty is not a reflection of the value of Rachel Burkheimer’s life, the horror surrounding her death or the depth of pain her family and friends are suffering daily. Some murders and victims receive more attention than others and their cases result in varying penalties, but each death has an irreversible impact on our community and calls for our criminal justice system to respond.

Snohomish County has done that and its citizens can be confident the standard has been set high for a fair and just trial to follow. That is what every prosecutor’s office owes the public — and most of all, the victim.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Tina Ruybal prepares ballots to be moved to the extraction point in the Snohomish County Election Center on Nov. 3, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: A win for vote-by-mail, amid gathering concern

A judge preserved the state’s deadline for mailed ballots, but more challenges to voting are ahead.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Jan. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support of Everett schools’ bond, levy shapes student success

As a proud parent of daughters who began their Everett Public Schools… Continue reading

New pharmacy at Everett clinic site will aid patients

I applaud our local pharmacist Sovit Bista for opening Robin Hood Pharmacy… Continue reading

Goldberg: ICE killing of Renee Good meant as message for us all

Civil rights, not just of immigrants, but of all Americans are being curtailed. Protest no longer is protected speech.

Comment: DOJ’s voter info demand a data breach waiting to happen

A centralized database of sensitive information is prone to abuse, theft and human error.

Kristof: In Venezuela, Trump trades rule of law for rule of oil

Its socialist government, which lost the last election, remains in power; as long as it bends to Trump.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: No new taxes, but maybe ‘pay as we go’ on some needs

New taxes won’t resolve the state’s budget woes, but more limited reforms can still make a difference.

Washington state's Congressional Districts adopted in 2021. (Washington State Redistricting Commission)
Editorial: Lawmakers shouldn’t futz with partisan redistricting

A new proposal to allow state lawmakers to gerrymander congressional districts should be rejected.

Four people were injured in a suspected DUI collision Saturday night on Highway 99 near Lynnwood. (Washington State Patrol)
Editorial: Numbers, results back lower BAC for Washington

Utah’s experience backs Sen. John Lovick’s bill to lower the blood alcohol limit for drivers to 0.05.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Jan. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Supreme Court readies lifeline for House Republicans

A final gutting of the Voting Rights Act could swing districts to the GOP at all election levels

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.