Hard but defensible choice on death penalty

Te trial for the two young men charged with brutally murdering Rachel Burkheimer isn’t underway yet, but proponents of the death penalty might have felt a sense of defeat Wednesday when Snohomish County Prosecutor Janice Ellis announced she will not seek the ultimate punishment for John Phillip Anderson and John Alan Whitaker.

Even the headlines conjured feelings of defeat for some — "Pair to dodge death penalty," as if Anderson and Whitaker, through their own wits or luck, had slipped through society’s fingers.

However, if convicted, the two will spend the rest of their lives in prison without the possibility of release. Whatever side you fall on in the hotly debated issue of capital punishment, full justice is being sought by our county’s law enforcement officials.

It’s easy for some to label Ellis’ decision as solely financial or the result of politics, but there’s so much more behind such a weighty call. Ellis provided a detailed and well-justified account of her rationale to the public just moments after the decision was announced. After detailing the costs of such a trial, she made the critical point that in the penalty phase the state must prove "beyond a reasonable doubt that there are not sufficient mitigating circumstances to spare the defendant’s life." That’s not an easy thing to do given the events in some people’s lives.

By now, everyone has heard of the controversy surrounding the OK Boys Ranch and that Anderson was an 11-year-old boy living there when the scandal broke that the boys were being beaten and sexually assaulted. Even if a jury decided Anderson deserved death, the penalty phase would no doubt be appealed and played out again, as it has been with other cases here.

Putting aside this strong consideration, Ellis effectively argued that this case presents other difficulties: the motive for murder is unclear, jurors will be asked to decide guilt "based in part upon the testimony of co-defendants who have already pled guilty" and there is no "independent, corroborating evidence, such as DNA, to support the expected testimony." All of these are well-grounded reasons that support the final, difficult decision.

The decision to not seek the death penalty is not a reflection of the value of Rachel Burkheimer’s life, the horror surrounding her death or the depth of pain her family and friends are suffering daily. Some murders and victims receive more attention than others and their cases result in varying penalties, but each death has an irreversible impact on our community and calls for our criminal justice system to respond.

Snohomish County has done that and its citizens can be confident the standard has been set high for a fair and just trial to follow. That is what every prosecutor’s office owes the public — and most of all, the victim.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, March 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: One option for pausing pay raise for state electeds

Only a referendum could hold off pay increases for state lawmakers and others facing a budget crisis.

Friedman: Rule of law is on the line in Israel and the U.S.

Both Trump and Netanyahu appear poised to force constitutional crises in their quests for power.

Comment: ‘Forced joy’ is alienating employees and customers

Starbucks baristas must now doodle greetings on cups. It’s the wrong way to win engagement.

Comment: How long can Musk count on being White House fixture?

With Musk’s popularity suffering from his DOGE cuts, his money may not keep him in Trump’s good graces.

Comment: Have lawmakers forgotten they have constituents?

Some, particularly in the GOP, are begging out of town halls. Others are trying to limit initiatives.

Comment: Jury’s still out on economy, except for road report

Regardless of opinions on the eventual strength of the U.S. economy, getting there will be bumpy.

**EMBARGO: No electronic distribution, Web posting or street sales before Saturday at 3:00 a.m. ET on Mar. 1, 2025. No exceptions for any reasons. EMBARGO set by source.** House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, (D-NY) speaks at a news conference about Republicans’ potential budget cuts to Medicaid, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Feb. 27, 2025. As Republicans push a budget resolution through Congress that will almost certainly require Medicaid cuts to finance a huge tax reduction, Democrats see an opening to use the same strategy in 2026 that won them back the House in 2018. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Editorial: Don’t gut Medicaid for richest Americans’ tax cuts

Extending tax cuts, as promised by Republicans, would likely force damaging cuts to Medicaid.

Comment: Learning costs of ignoring environment the hard way

EPA chief Lee Zeldin can’t flip a switch on protections, but we’ll lose precious momentum on climate.

Comment: What promise to ‘review the data’ could mean for health

Noncommittal responses from the FDA nominee show a willingness to follow Trump’s whims, not science.

Two workers walk past a train following a press event at the Lynnwood City Center Link Station on Friday, June 7, 2024, in Lynnwood, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Open Sound Transit CEO hiring to public review

One finalist is known; the King County executive. All finalists should make their pitch to the public.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.