Harrop: Can we use good money donated by bad people?

It can depend on what was known at the time the money was accepted, but generally, yes.

By Froma Harrop

Syndicated columnist

The now-former head of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab went from hero to zero in a couple of news cycles. Once heralded for overseeing projects that use technology for social good, Joichi Ito resigned after revelations that he had tried to hide the source of donations from sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein.

It was the cover-up that ultimately did him in. Before that, there was some back and forth on the morality of taking good money from bad people; a subject on which hypocrisy often takes center stage. Few of the fortunes that shower colleges, medical facilities and the arts with millions were made in a totally squeaky-clean fashion. Hedge funders, for example, collect billions pillaging American companies, destroying thousands of jobs.

If some corporate creep offers $100 million to find a cure for Alzheimer’s, should a medical research center take the money? In almost all cases, yes.

When Ito sought Epstein’s contributions, all that was widely known of the financier’s dark past was his having pled guilty to soliciting a minor for prostitution. Going to a prostitute, as the young woman was then labeled, did not seem a heinous crime. Epstein said he was chastened and had taken steps to ensure that would not happen again.

Until recently, few knew of Epstein’s alleged subsequent abuse of underage girls on an industrial scale. That would presumably include Ito.

“I told Joi to take the money,” Nicholas Negroponte, a famous architect and one of the lab’s founders, said. Based on what was known at the time, he added, “I would do it again.”

Harvard University, by the way, had accepted $6.5 million from Epstein and rightly says it has no intention of giving it back. If it did, the money wouldn’t disappear. It would go somewhere else, perhaps a less-worthy destination. Also relevant is that Epstein’s fortune came out of his financial wheeling and dealing and not his alleged sex trafficking of minors.

Which brings us to another controversial source of charity: the Koch brothers. Koch Industries’ immense wealth originated in the fossil fuels business. There’s nothing inherently evil about oil money or even coal money. Early in the last century, coal powered the country. It is on its way out, being rapidly replaced by cleaner natural gas and very clean renewable energy.

The scientific consensus says global warming is a threat to our civilization and fossil fuel use is much the cause. But in their lust to amass still more wealth, the Koch brothers funded a massive disinformation campaign to deny the existence of human-caused climate change. The Kochs are also unapologetic polluters of the American heartland.

Theirs is bad money from bad people. Upon David Koch’s recent death, much has been written about the $1.3 billion the billionaire gave to good causes. Do I begrudge New York’s Metropolitan Museum, American Museum of Natural History, Lincoln Center and Hospital for Special Surgery for cashing Koch’s checks? I do not.

But this sum doesn’t come near compensating for the harm he and his brothers have done to our natural world. Nor does pasting his name on revered institutions clean his reputation, at least not in the history books.

Take his money, sure, but institutions should exert more judgment on naming rights. The David H. Koch Plaza at the Metropolitan Museum is one thing. The David H. Koch Dinosaur Wing at the Museum of Natural History is quite another. There’s something unseemly about naming an exhibition dedicated to science after an enemy of scientific scholarship.

I don’t anticipate there will be any “Jeffery Epstein School of” anything in the conceivable future. But if good institutions can use his money to advance good missions, go ahead.

Follow Froma Harrop on Twitter @FromaHarrop. Email her at fharrop@gmail.com.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Aug. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Editorial: Debate regarding Snake River dams is far from over

If we are to avoid the extinction of salmon runs and orcas, talks regarding the dams should continue.

Commentary: TV has reinforced ambition as bad trait for women

Criticisms of women on Biden’s veep list echo scripts that insist women must deny presidential hopes.

Commentary: Improper spending has left NRA out of ammo

Having to draw from its foundation to keep its doors open, the now-diminished gun lobby faces its end.

Harrop: Every country made mistakes; we didn’t learn from ours

While European nations took a bigger hit economically, they’re better able to recover now than the U.S.

Mask scofflaws are encouraging spread of virus

Covid is spreading faster than the lies and misinformation coming out of… Continue reading

Rules confusing for objections on county planning commission

For residents of the county who are interested in land use issues,… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Monday, Aug. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Editorial: Release of weekly list of deaths should resume

The county health district no longer provides the list to The Herald; but it’s misinterpreting the law.

Most Read