Health board should set rules for vaping in public

Before the risks of second-hand cigarette smoke were better understood and led to laws that curtailed smoking in public places, it was common to hear a polite tobacco user ask: “Mind if I smoke?”

Comedian Steve Martin had a snappy comeback that we won’t repeat here — kids, ask your parents — but which might again be useful with the growth in the use of e-cigarettes.

E-cigarettes are battery-powered, typically cylindrical devices that heat a small amount of flavored liquid, commonly containing nicotine, into an aerosol vapor that is inhaled like tobacco smoke, resulting in a pretty impressive cloud when exhaled.

Users of e-cigarettes and the vaping industry defend the devices as a substitute for tobacco and as a way for many to quit smoking. According to a recent study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 12.6 percent of all adults and 21.6 percent of young adults 18 to 24 have tried vaping at least once, but only 3.7 percent currently use e-cigarettes every day or on some days. The same study also found that current tobacco smokers and those who had quit smoking within the past year were more likely to use e-cigarettes than former smokers or adults who had never smoked.

There’s conflicting information on the safety of e-cigarettes. A review of evidence published by Public Health England, the United Kingdom’s public health agency, found that vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking because the carcinogens and other unhealthful components of cigarette smoke aren’t present in e-cigarettes.

But the vaping liquid often does contain nicotine, which is an addictive drug. And the liquid used isn’t regulated by the federal Food and Drug Administration. There is no standard for the ingredients in the liquid, and often ingredients aren’t listed beyond a general description of the flavors. While anecdotal, there also have been reports of vaping devices exploding and causing fires.

Were this simply a matter of personal risk, it would be up to individual users to determine whether this was a safe choice for themselves. But just as we have passed laws that address second-hand smoke, until more is known about what’s exhaled into the air we all breathe and what the risks are for others, specifically pregnant women, children and those with compromised lungs, we need to place the same restrictions on public vaping that we do on public smoking.

The Snohomish Health District’s Board of Health on Tuesday, will hold a final public hearing and could vote to adopt changes to the county’s sanitary code that would consider vaping in public similar to smoking:

  • The use of e-cigarettes would be prohibited in public places, including restaurants and bars, and in places of employment.
  • E-cigarette products couldn’t be sold to or possessed by minors.
  • Sales would require photo ID and the products would have to be kept behind a counter in a secured display.

The proposal would make an exception that would allow some of the shops selling e-cigarette products to offer sampling of the vaping devices and liquid.

The Snohomish Health District has not rushed the process. Three months ago, district staff, led by Director and Health Office Gary Goldbaum, began seeking public comment on the proposal and specifically sought out the opinions of shop owners and those who use the products. The exception for sampling was a result of that process.

Goldbaum isn’t arguing with those who see these as life-saving devices and as a way to stop smoking.

But he does have concerns for what we don’t know about the contents of the liquid and about the use of vaping products by youths. The state Department of Health’s 2014 Healthy Youth Survey found that nearly 1 in 4 high school seniors had used e-cigarettes in the past 30 days, raising the likelihood of nicotine addiction. The flavored liquid also can also pose a risk of poisoning if ingested by children.

“Safer doesn’t mean safe,” Goldbaum said.

E-cigarettes have been around for about 10 years, and we’re just now learning more about their potential benefits and risks to health. Some restrictions regarding their use in public are reasonable and necessary.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

Sentencing reforms more complicated than column described

I read Todd Welch’s Jan. 29 column. He is certainly entitled to… Continue reading

President Trump running nation like his failed businesses

We’ve seen it before; President Trump will do or say anything to… Continue reading

Intent of Trump’s nominees is to subvert good government

It is clear that Donald Trump has something specific in mind with… Continue reading

Comment: Musk’s USAID shutdown an attack on most vulnerable

Even promises of ‘waivers’ are falling short and allowing medical efforts to dry up, endangering millions.

Comment: Real dangers loom with Trump’s incoherent trade policy

Even if Trump could settle on a justification for his tariffs, the results could leave the country far. weaker.

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump can go only as far as the courts will allow

Most of Trump’s executive orders are likely to face court challenges, setting the limits of presidential power.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.