I-1366 would result in a mess

To put it simply, voters should reject Initiative 1366.

Initiative promoter Tim Eyman, in his quest to require that the Legislature submit to a two-thirds majority in both houses for tax increases, is back with I-1366.

Earlier initiatives were either overturned by the state Supreme Court or suspended by the Legislature. This time the initiative seeks to make the requirement part of the state constitution. But because state law says the constitution can’t be changed by initiative, Eyman and his backers are using this initiative to force the Legislature’s hand to draft an amendment and bring it before voters for their approval.

I-1366 seeks to spur lawmakers to offer the amendment through the use of what some have called blackmail. Eyman considers it leverage, similar to the threat to take away his son’s Xbox unless he takes out the garbage.

But this is more than a night without video games. Unless the Legislature drafts an amendment to put before the voters, the state’s sales tax rate would be reduced by 1 percentage point, to 5.5 percent from 6.5 percent as of April 15, 2016. The hit of such a reduction to state revenue would be staggering, between $1.4 billion and $1.7 billion each year, $8 billion over a six-year period.

That would be huge hole to fill for a Legislature that has struggled to meet a Supreme Court mandate that it amply fund basic education for K-12 students.

I-1366 offers a choice between two paths: Amend the constitution or face a budgetary crisis.

Passing a constitutional amendment to require a two-thirds majority in both houses for tax increases would likely permanently lock the state into its current system of taxes. And it’s a system that many, including the nonprofit and nonpartisan Institute of Taxation and Economic Policy, say is the most regressive and unfair tax system in the nation. Because of Washington state’s reliance on sales tax, those making less than $21,000 a year pay nearly 17 percent of their income as taxes, while those in the top 1 percent, making more than $507,000 a year, pay only 2.4 percent of their income as taxes.

Even an attempt to pass revenue-neutral reforms would be subject to the two-thirds requirement, because even as some taxes would be reduced, others would need to be increased. A two-thirds majority would be, as is intended, extremely difficult to a achieve. As few as 17 senators or 33 representatives could scuttle any tax reform proposal.

Supporters of Eyman’s initiative, however, may be making a dangerous assumption that the Legislature will take the path for a constitutional amendment. Proposing a amendment to the voters would, itself, require a two-thirds majority in both houses. How far-fetched is it to imagine that either 33 representative or 17 senators would call Eyman’s bluff and allow the sales tax rate to be reduced, resulting in a budgetary crisis that could finally force tax reform?

The most likely scenario should voters approve I-1366 is that it, like many of its brethren, will be rejected by the Supreme Court. Eyman seems unconcerned about that possibility, believing in the “lobbying effect” of his initiatives. For example, even though Eyman’s I-695, which sought to eliminate the state’s Motor Vehicle Excise Tax and impose the two-thirds requirement, was found unconstitutional, the initiative’s approval by voters successfully lobbied the Legislature to set the limit for car tabs at $30.

But the two paths that I-1366 offers muddies the message of Eyman’s “lobbying effect.” Do those who vote for I-1366 want the constitutional amendment or the reduction in sales tax?

And why is a two-thirds majority worthy of inscribing in the state constitution?

This year, even with the state Supreme Court’s finding of contempt hanging over it on education funding, the state Legislature rejected several tax increase proposals. The one tax increase it did approve, an increase in the gas tax, was passed at the urging of many Republicans who rightly saw the need for a significant state investment in transportation, one necessary for the state economy. By the way, the House voted, 54-44, for the gas tax increase, which would have fallen short of a two-thirds majority.

With exceptions, notably amendments to the state constitution, rule by a simple majority has allowed necessary legislation to move forward while protecting the interests of the people of Washington. There’s no need to change that.

I-1366 offers only uncertainty for the funding of K-12 schools, higher education, health care, public safety and more.

And for its supporters it may be hiding the unintended consequence of the opposite of what they seek.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

April 14, 2024: Follow the White Bronco
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, April 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Liz Skinner, right, and Emma Titterness, both from Domestic Violence Services of Snohomish County, speak with a man near the Silver Lake Safeway while conducting a point-in-time count Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024, in Everett, Washington. The man, who had slept at that location the previous night, was provided some food and a warming kit after participating in the PIT survey. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Among obstacles, hope to curb homelessness

Panelists from service providers and local officials discussed homelessness’ interwoven challenges.

Comment: Rule must change to allow dialysis as end-of-life care

An outdated rule may change to allow patients in palliative care to receive the comfort of kidney dialysis.

Comment: County executive should drop rural cluster housing plan

The planning commission rejected the plan to protect commercial forests and limit rural sprawl.

Comment: Over-regulation of AI could hold us back in tech race

Policies that tie the hands of tech innovators threaten the advances we can realize through AI.

Forum: What if Dumbledore supervised Boeing’s production line?

The professor’s advice to Harry Potter was to chose right over easy and quick. Is that what Boeing missed?

Forum: Question for Trump supporters; where lie your loyalties?

Those who would vote for a would-be dictator need to consider their bond to their nation’s ideals.

Editorial cartoons for Friday, April 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - In this photo taken Oct. 2, 2018, semi-automatic rifles fill a wall at a gun shop in Lynnwood, Wash. Gov. Jay Inslee is joining state Attorney General Bob Ferguson to propose limits to magazine capacity and a ban on the sale of assault weapons. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, File)
Editorial: ‘History, tradition’ poor test for gun safety laws

Judge’s ruling against the state’s law on large-capacity gun clips is based on a problematic decision.

Schwab: Repent! God is angry at the sins of Trumpublicans

Why else would God have directed His earth-shaking wrath near Trump’s New Jersey golf course?

Marysville neighborhood commits to building neighbor culture

In a time when so many of us live our lives through… Continue reading

Look at what Biden, Democrats have done

All these crises belong to President Biden and the Democrats. Sixty days… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.