I-713 ‘ballot box biology’ is too extreme and risky

By ED OWENS

When farmers, cattle and sheep ranchers, commercial and sport fishers, scientists and scientific societies, timber companies, business, politicians and wildlife conservationists can all agree on something, it’s worth paying attention. Over 300 groups, organizations and prominent public opinion leaders have joined together to fight the latest “ballot box biology” effort in Washington state.

Ballot box biology is a recent phenomenon in American politics. The creation of self-styled animal rights groups, ballot box biology is the technique and rationale used by these organizations to impose their extreme ideologies on the wildlife management policies in those states that allow initiatives. On the surface, many of their proposals seem to have some degree of validity. However, when examined under the microscope of scientific inquiry, the agendas promoted by these animal rights organizations – which know little or nothing about the species and land they hope to dominate – are found tragically and, in some cases, dangerously lacking.

If the proposals being brought forward – like Initiative 713 – had any merit whatsoever, they could and should be submitted to the intense scrutiny, debate, and public disclosure that Washington’s wildlife issues normally undergo before the state Legislature, the Fish and Wildlife Commission and the scientists and professional wildlife managers of the Department of Fish and Wildlife. That’s the fair way, the Washington way.

We, as taxpayers, pay hundreds of millions of dollars a year to have professional and scientific resources available to us as tools for managing our wildlife. The scientists and professional managers we’re paying should be permitted to do the job we expect of them without the millstone of ballot box biology placing them between a rock and a hard place because of poorly conceived, badly written law.

Absent the structural support of sound wildlife biology, the agenda for managing Washington’s lands and animals being promoted by outside special interests intentionally sidesteps our wildlife management process. Instead they opt for the hard, direct sale to the public via the initiative process. Ballot box biology employs the same Madison Avenue techniques used to sell an unsuspecting public a host of unneeded, shoddily constructed items – from vegetable peelers to phone sex – that promise the world but, once they are bought, paid for and unwrapped, prove unsatisfying. Rarely if ever do they live up to the claims made in their hard-sell radio and television advertising sales pitches.

Ballot box biology is no different. Touted as “direct democracy” and a means to take vital issues “directly to the people,” the modern initiative process has become the play toy of wealthy special-interest individuals and groups whose deep pockets provide the cash to hammer home hard-sell messages about nice sounding but completely inadequate “solutions” to public policy problems, even when no such problem exists. In fact, up through the end of August, 75 percent of the more than half million dollars the I-713 campaign had raised had come from outside Washington state. Instead of broad public debate and deliberation on issues of vital importance, many of today’s initiatives have become ways two or three wealthy individuals or groups can change the system to their own advantage in a system where the winner is too often determined by the amount of money spent, not the merits of the arguments offered.

Ballot box biology is based on whether or not a proponent has cash to buy enough advertising to convince one more voter than the opposition. It has nothing to do with scientific research and nothing to do with sound and effective proposals on the health, welfare or conservation of one animal, much less all of Washington’s wildlife and wild places.

We have seen enough of ballot box biology in Washington state. It is time to stand up and just say no to ill conceived, poorly written legislation driven by animal rights agendas rather than sound science and good old-fashioned common sense. I-713 is just too extreme – it even bans mole and gopher traps -and does not deserve to become public law in our state.

Tell your friends and neighbors to cast a vote for common sense. Vote ‘no’ to I-713.

Just say no to ballot box biology.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Feb. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

Schwab: Trump proves not as bad as feared; it’s worse

Taking food and medicine from kids; surrendering control to Musk; is this what you voted for?

Keep necessary homeless service program at its Everett location

Regarding The Herald’s front-page coverage of the Hope ‘N Wellness community services… Continue reading

We can’t afford the rich not paying their fair share

In a recent column, Todd Welch claims that a wealth tax on… Continue reading

Can we find a politically moderate path, please?

I was just wondering what happened to the moderates. I am a… Continue reading

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

A press operator grabs a Herald newspaper to check over as the papers roll off the press in March 2022 in Everett. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Push back news desert with journalism support

A bill in the state Senate would tax big tech to support a hiring fund for local news outlets.

Jayden Hill, 15, an incoming sophomore at Monroe High School is reflected in the screen of a cellphone on Wednesday, July 10, 2024 in Monroe, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Students need limits on cellphones in school

School districts needn’t wait for legislation to start work on policies to limit phones in class.

Kristof: World’s richest men take on world’s poorest people

Trump says the USAID is run by ‘radical lunitics.’ Is saving countless lives now lunacy.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Feb. 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Lake Stevens school bond funds needed safety work at all schools

A parent’s greatest fear is for something bad to happen to their… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.