I-713 ‘ballot box biology’ is too extreme and risky


When farmers, cattle and sheep ranchers, commercial and sport fishers, scientists and scientific societies, timber companies, business, politicians and wildlife conservationists can all agree on something, it’s worth paying attention. Over 300 groups, organizations and prominent public opinion leaders have joined together to fight the latest “ballot box biology” effort in Washington state.

Ballot box biology is a recent phenomenon in American politics. The creation of self-styled animal rights groups, ballot box biology is the technique and rationale used by these organizations to impose their extreme ideologies on the wildlife management policies in those states that allow initiatives. On the surface, many of their proposals seem to have some degree of validity. However, when examined under the microscope of scientific inquiry, the agendas promoted by these animal rights organizations – which know little or nothing about the species and land they hope to dominate – are found tragically and, in some cases, dangerously lacking.

If the proposals being brought forward – like Initiative 713 – had any merit whatsoever, they could and should be submitted to the intense scrutiny, debate, and public disclosure that Washington’s wildlife issues normally undergo before the state Legislature, the Fish and Wildlife Commission and the scientists and professional wildlife managers of the Department of Fish and Wildlife. That’s the fair way, the Washington way.

We, as taxpayers, pay hundreds of millions of dollars a year to have professional and scientific resources available to us as tools for managing our wildlife. The scientists and professional managers we’re paying should be permitted to do the job we expect of them without the millstone of ballot box biology placing them between a rock and a hard place because of poorly conceived, badly written law.

Absent the structural support of sound wildlife biology, the agenda for managing Washington’s lands and animals being promoted by outside special interests intentionally sidesteps our wildlife management process. Instead they opt for the hard, direct sale to the public via the initiative process. Ballot box biology employs the same Madison Avenue techniques used to sell an unsuspecting public a host of unneeded, shoddily constructed items – from vegetable peelers to phone sex – that promise the world but, once they are bought, paid for and unwrapped, prove unsatisfying. Rarely if ever do they live up to the claims made in their hard-sell radio and television advertising sales pitches.

Ballot box biology is no different. Touted as “direct democracy” and a means to take vital issues “directly to the people,” the modern initiative process has become the play toy of wealthy special-interest individuals and groups whose deep pockets provide the cash to hammer home hard-sell messages about nice sounding but completely inadequate “solutions” to public policy problems, even when no such problem exists. In fact, up through the end of August, 75 percent of the more than half million dollars the I-713 campaign had raised had come from outside Washington state. Instead of broad public debate and deliberation on issues of vital importance, many of today’s initiatives have become ways two or three wealthy individuals or groups can change the system to their own advantage in a system where the winner is too often determined by the amount of money spent, not the merits of the arguments offered.

Ballot box biology is based on whether or not a proponent has cash to buy enough advertising to convince one more voter than the opposition. It has nothing to do with scientific research and nothing to do with sound and effective proposals on the health, welfare or conservation of one animal, much less all of Washington’s wildlife and wild places.

We have seen enough of ballot box biology in Washington state. It is time to stand up and just say no to ill conceived, poorly written legislation driven by animal rights agendas rather than sound science and good old-fashioned common sense. I-713 is just too extreme – it even bans mole and gopher traps -and does not deserve to become public law in our state.

Tell your friends and neighbors to cast a vote for common sense. Vote ‘no’ to I-713.

Just say no to ballot box biology.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, June 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Father's Day is a holiday of honouring fatherhood and paternal bonds, as well as the influence of fathers in society.
Editorial: Men, boys could use a little help to be better men

The work of fathers could be aided by a state commission focused on the issues of boys and men.

Comment: Father’s love includes talking about drugs, alcohol

All dads want to protect and care for their kids. Among the greatest threats are drugs and alcohol.

FILE — Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and his wife, Martha-Ann, visit the Capitol Rotunda as the Rev. Billy Graham lay in honor there on Feb. 28, 2018. Martha-Ann Alito has built a limited public life since moving to Washington that has mainly centered on apolitical projects and charity work. (Erin Schaff/The New York Times)
Comment: This conversation may be recorded

It’s not just Supreme Court justices who need worry. Our laws around electronic monitoring are lax.

Don’t blame woodpeckers for damage to PUD power poles

The Snohomish County Public Utility Districts knows that there are lots of… Continue reading

Mainsream media is only serving elites

Without a doubt, the lowest life form in America today is the… Continue reading

Comment: Climate crisis requires declaration of World War Zero

We’ve done it before with the New Deal, World War II and the space race; and we can do it again.

Comment: Lynnwood’s cannabis ban stifles business, progress

The city council’s reversal of a vote to consider retail marijuana is based on unfounded fears.

The City of Everett is set to purchase two single sidewalk restrooms from Romtec, a company based in Roseburg, Ore., for $315,000. (Romtec)
Editorial: Utilitarian but sturdy restrooms should be a relief

Everett is placing four stalls downtown that should be accessible but less prone to problems.

Artist Natalie Niblack works amongst her project entitled “33 Birds / Three Degrees” during the setup for Exploring The Edge at Schack Art Center on Sunday, March 19, 2023, in Everett, Washington. The paintings feature motion-activated speakers that play each bird’s unique call. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: For 50 years Schack Art Center there for creation

The art center is more art studio than museum, supporting artists and fostering creativity in kids.

Snohomish School District’s Clayton Lovell plugs in the district’s electric bus after morning routes on Thursday, March 6, 2024, at the district bus depot in Snohomish, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Money well spent on switch to electric school buses

With grants awarded to local school districts, a study puts a dollar figure on health, climate savings.

Editorial cartoons for Saturday, June 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.