In China, listen closely to what they don’t say

  • Jim Hoagland / Washington Post columnist
  • Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:00pm
  • Opinion

The scene: A solitary figure slumps behind an imposing desk near the open window. Sea breezes blow in from China’s Bohai Gulf and flutter the curtains in this work area of Building 8, Beidaihe’s most hidden and luxurious villa. Piles of draft documents for the 16th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party tumble over the desk and onto the floor. Jiang Zemin rises wearily, glances out the window and walks downstage to begin his soliloquy:

Swimming half the day, arguing with the party’s American experts the rest. I don’t know which I hate more. And both are Mao’s fault. He started bringing the whole party leadership here for August and plunging into the waves — for hours — to show them, and the nation, how active he still was. So I’m stuck with this collegial "working vacation." And with his troublesome Americans.

(A smirk plays on the face of the 76-year-old Chinese president.)

My experts say that the Bush White House can’t wait for me to go. That the Bush people can’t wait to roll over this unknown and untested Fourth Generationer that the congress will soon bless to succeed me. They think they can encircle us and we will do nothing, because we are going through a leadership change. So what if I just don’t go, Mr. George W.? What if I don’t let Hu Jintao take over on schedule? What does that do to your so-called "China policy"?

So I let stories that I am reconsidering my retirement go on circulating: to get under Bush’s skin. To repay him for that Dalai Lama business in Shanghai. Besides, who will say it is such a terrible idea? That I stay on in office in threatening times to guide these youngsters who have no connection with the 1949 Revolution and the First Generation of leaders it produced. Dick Cheney would understand.

Hu plays his cards well — for a kid of 59. He did that question-and-answer session in Washington last winter, to show the Council on Foreign Relationers how ‘with it’ and spontaneous he is. But the agents I sent with him tell me that Hu read every answer from the script we agreed on here, whatever the question was. Good obedient lad.

Of course we speak from detailed scripts when we meet with foreigners. And each other. Bush seems surprised, and impatient, when I start the prepared parts. Maybe I shouldn’t take it personally. Our agents have picked up what Colin Powell said when he was told that other secretaries of state had insisted on at least an hour alone every week with their presidents to talk foreign policy: "But what would I do with the other 55 minutes?" Is there an attention span problem here?

Doesn’t Bush understand that it is only in the third hour of the fourth meeting that we can begin to be frank with a stranger? He must listen as closely to what we don’t say in these scripts — each of which we have debated for hours — as to what we do say. Listening is as important an art as talking. No, it is more important.

And Shanghai last October? Bush rushed to tell me that he did not want to argue about Tibet. But he wanted me to know that this Dalai Lama seemed totally reasonable, worth my talking to. We had not scripted an answer for that one! So I went totally inscrutable on Bush. Maintained radio silence. He finally changed the subject.

Look, we never expected wine and roses from this guy. He’s not Clinton. He’s not even Dad. But he has used this war on terrorism to put American bases on our western border, to pry Russia away from us, to give the Japanese navy a pretext for sailing farther south and west than ever before, to talk about joint military projects with India and to introduce U.S. forces back to the Philippines and Indonesia.

That’s encirclement. That’s not something we can ignore. And all this while we have been quiet about Taiwan and about Pakistan’s problems with India, so we could get on with a quiet leadership change at home.

Well, Mr. George W., don’t count your encircled chickens yet. I will not become a lame Beijing duck just to suit you. My legacy, like Mao’s and Deng’s, will have an American piece too. I had Clinton eating from our hand. You bite it. You will pay. If Hu cannot do it, I can.

He frowns. He turns. Exit Jiang Zemin. Or maybe not.

Jim Hoagland can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200 or hoaglandj@washpost.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Editorial: A win for vote-by-mail, amid gathering concern

A judge preserved the state’s deadline for mailed ballots, but more challenges to voting are ahead.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Jan. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support of Everett schools’ bond, levy shapes student success

As a proud parent of daughters who began their Everett Public Schools… Continue reading

New pharmacy at Everett clinic site will aid patients

I applaud our local pharmacist Sovit Bista for opening Robin Hood Pharmacy… Continue reading

Goldberg: ICE killing of Renee Good meant as message for us all

Civil rights, not just of immigrants, but of all Americans are being curtailed. Protest no longer is protected speech.

Comment: DOJ’s voter info demand a data breach waiting to happen

A centralized database of sensitive information is prone to abuse, theft and human error.

Kristof: In Venezuela, Trump trades rule of law for rule of oil

Its socialist government, which lost the last election, remains in power; as long as it bends to Trump.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Jan. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: No new taxes, but maybe ‘pay as we go’ on some needs

New taxes won’t resolve the state’s budget woes, but more limited reforms can still make a difference.

Comment: Supreme Court readies lifeline for House Republicans

A final gutting of the Voting Rights Act could swing districts to the GOP at all election levels

Comment: Europe must prepare for Trump’s plans for Greenland

The vast northern island may not be next on Trump’s list, but his threats and U.S. might provide an inside track.

Comment: Don’t punish Illinois, other states for Minnesota’s fraud

The withholding of funding of social programs looks suspiciously partisan and particularly unfair.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.