It erodes definition of marriage

As the debate over who can be married in the United States rages, some important elements seem to be missing from the national conversation. The definition of marriage – the only issue – has been consigned to the periphery of the debate. How we define marriage is pivotal because definitions include some things and exclude others. Robert P. George, professor of politics at Princeton, defines it this way: “Marriage is a two-in-one-flesh communion of persons that is consummated and actualized by acts which are reproductive in type, whether or not they are reproductive in effect.” (Notice that elderly and infertile couples are embraced in this definition). Have there been exceptions to this definition in various times and places (e.g. polygamy, prohibitions against interracial marriage)? Yes. They are called aberrations.

John Q. Citizen is roused with righteous anger when informed that Steve and Dennis will not be allowed to “love” and “commit to” one another if the current view of marriage stands. By affirming heterosexual marriage is society limiting Steve’s ability to love and commit to Dennis? No. Society is saying to them: “You have a relationship. And whatever you’d like to call it, it isn’t, nor can it ever be marriage.”

Opponents of any given policy often speak of their rivals’ potential victory as “opening a Pandora’s box” or setting a “domino effect into motion.” Clichs? Yes. But consider – under what principles could San Francisco City Hall as it currently wishes to define (or, really, un-define) marriage turn away the following applicants?: 1. A consenting father and of-age daughter; 2. A man and two women or 3. Ten men and 10 women? In their rush to not turn some away, they’ve stripped their ability to turn anyone away.

Please encourage your political leaders to support and affirm the already embattled institution of marriage.


Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Sept. 22

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - Six-year-old Eric Aviles receives the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine from pharmacist Sylvia Uong at a pediatric vaccine clinic for children ages 5 to 11 set up at Willard Intermediate School in Santa Ana, Calif., Tuesday, Nov. 9, 2021. In a statement Sunday, Nov. 28, 2021, California's public health officer, Dr. Tomas J. Aragon, said that officials are monitoring the Omicron variant. There are no reports to date of the variant in California, the statement said. Aragon said the state was focusing on ensuring its residents have access to vaccines and booster shots. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong, File)
Editorial: A plea for watchful calm this time regarding covid

We don’t need a repeat of uncontrolled infections or of the divisions over vaccines and masks.

Flowers bloom on the end of a dead tree on Spencer Island on Monday, Aug. 28, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Restore salmon habitat but provide view of its work

Comments are sought on a plan to restore fish habitat to the island east of Everett with popular trails.

Comment: GOP ‘projection’ is slideshow of hypocrisy, deflection

Trump, of course, is guilty, but so are House Republicans desperate to ferret out elusive dirt on Joe Biden.

Arlington Mayor Tolbert has helped her region rebuild, grow

Arlington Mayor Barb Tolbert has implemented the best programs to help people… Continue reading

Johnson’s endorsements reason enough to earn vote for sheriff

Another week. Another death at the Snohomish County jail (“Man, 38, identified… Continue reading

Resumption of expanded child tax credit can fight poverty

The U.S. Census Bureau has released poverty data for 2022 and the… Continue reading

Comment: Musk is his CEO’s X-factor (and not in a good way)

Musk is the widely variable variable for the X chief executive who can’t make headway on advertising.

Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Sept. 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Most Read