It helps us to help Housing Hope

Regarding the Friday letter, “Housing Hope plan too costly”: This person seems to be suggesting that this is some kind of “arm’s length” deal. What does that mean? The term smacks of aspersions either on the part of a council or some other agency involved in this “deal.” I don’t think this kind of letter should be published. If someone has a concern or objection about how things are done in Snohomish, and I have some, the complaints still should be made clear and dealt with in an honorable manner.

I happen to be someone who is familiar with Housing Hope, although not personally involved. My knowledge is that it is run well and applicants are screened thoroughly and assisted throughout the time of help. So what if the taxpayers of this county need to contribute toward the purchase? Is the writer suggesting that unless he personally profits from the other investments the county makes they should not be done? No. This letter smacks of a “not in my backyard” mentality that I abhor.

The idea that there are not homeless, that there are not drug dealers and users, that there are not ex-felons, and criminals, people packing unregistered and registered guns residing around the southeast corner of the Avenue E and Second Street intersection, is to deny that there are not these same kinds of disenfranchised citizens living next to this writer and next to me. It’s a simplistic, non-productive way to look at all these problems staring each and every one of us in the face in our communities.

My only concern any time a community assists the homeless is: Are there jobs to match their needs in a close proximity to the housing? If not, then it is not a proper place in which to place low-income housing or this kind of program. Why? Because these needy, but usually well-deserving, hard-working people need and want work. And if you have them living far from work opportunities they cannot become self-reliant and self-sufficient. Both goals of Housing Hope.

Patricia Therrell

Snohomish

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Nov. 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: From opposite ends of crime, a plea for justice reform

A survivor of crime and an incarceree support a bill to forge better outcomes for both communities.

Comment: Misnamed Fix Our Forest Act would worsen wildfire risk

The U.S. Senate bill doesn’t fund proven strategies and looks to increase harvest in protective forests.

Comment: City governments should stay out of the grocery market

Rather than run its own grocery stores, government should get out of the way of private companies.

Forum: Grading students needs shift from testing to achievement

Standardized tests are alienating students and teachers. Focus education on participation and goals.

Forum: Varied interests for ecology, civil rights can speak together

A recent trip to Portland revealed themes common to concerns for protecting salmon, wildlife and civil rights.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Nov. 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Editorial: Welcome guidance on speeding public records duty

The state attorney general is advancing new rules for compliance with the state’s public records law.

The Buzz: Shutdown? What shutdown? We’ got 20,000 emails to read.

Trump was tired of talking about affordability, until emails from a former friend were released.

Schwab: Democratic Party was caught between caving and caring

Those who ended the shutdown ended the challenge but restored vital benefits, because Democrats care.

A state income tax is fair and can fund our needs

The constant tug-of-war between raising taxes and cutting spending is maddening. The… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.