Justices’ death penalty decision makes sense

The experts had plenty to say last week about the Supreme Court’s ruling that judges can’t sentence a person to death based on information the jury didn’t weigh. Headlines across America blared, "Only juries can impose death penalty," and "Supreme Court overturns death sentence law in five states." Media pundits and others declared the decision an anti-death penalty move from a court that has typically been pro-capital punishment.

With such comments and headlines flying around, it could be difficult to grasp the real meaning and impact of the decision. Such confusion could also lead to emotional reactions based on misinformation — something our country doesn’t need in light of a federal court’s recent decision regarding the Pledge of Allegiance.

For a better understanding of the court’s meaning, it’s best to go straight to the justices’ own words, which strongly suggest this decision isn’t about slowly chipping away at capital punishment but about the constitutional guarantee of a trial by a jury.

"What (the) decision says is that the jury must find the existence of the fact that an aggravating factor existed," Justice Antonin Scalia said. "Those states that leave the ultimate life-or-death decision to the judge may continue to do so — by requiring a prior jury finding of an aggravating factor in the sentencing phase or, more simply, by placing the aggravating factor determination (where it logically belongs anyway) in the guilt phase."

Washington doesn’t appear to be impacted by the court’s decision. But states that leave it up to a judge to look at factors a jury didn’t get to examine will have to make serious changes. It should be noted that under the new ruling it appears judges can reject a jury’s recommendation of the death penalty.

Opponents argued that judges were sometimes the best ones to make the ultimate life or death decision, because they were less likely than juries to be emotional. But if juries in other states, such as our own, can make an intelligent, reasoned decision based on information presented, why shouldn’t other states be held to the same standard?

If people need more proof that this case was about trials by jury and not whittling away at capital punishment, they should look at the court’s 2000 decision that struck down a law allowing judges to increase prison terms if they decided an offense was a hate crime. Not so fast, the court ruled. A jury needs to examine those aggravating factors, justices said.

Put in this context, the decision makes sense and is not a threat to the implementation of capital punishment. However, it does offer some much-needed review of our country’s procedures for executing its worst offenders — a review people on both sides of the debate should welcome calmly and objectively.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - In this Friday, Oct. 4, 2019, file photo, a man using an electronic cigarette exhales in Mayfield Heights, Ohio. On Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2019, the American Medical Association said it is calling for an immediate ban on all electronic cigarette and vaping devices. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak, File)
Editorial: Shut down flavored tobacco’s gateway to youths

Legislation in Olympia would bar the use of flavors and menthol in vape products and cigarettes.

Herald report of Everett protest inaccurate, biased

I was at the rally and protest in Everett last on Feb.… Continue reading

Media shouldn’t use ‘she’ for trans people

About 79 percent of Americans oppose those observed male at birth from… Continue reading

USAID freeze halts vital aid work

I am outraged the Trump administration is making the U.S. weaker in… Continue reading

Goldberg: Trump declares war on higher ed, not just woke parts

The move, aided by Elon Musk, to gut NIH funding, is part of a larger and debilitating attack on academia.

Comment: Trump’s Kennedy Center will narrow exposure to art

Trump’s move to takeover the Kennedy Center is not about the arts but about celebrating his tastes.

Rivian, based in Irvine, Calif., has introduced its new R2 models, smaller and more affordable SUVs. (Rivian)
Editorial: Open electric vehicle market to direct sales

Legislation would allow EV makers to sell directly to customers, making lease or purchase easier.

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: U.S. and Canada better neighbors than housemates

President Trump may be serious about annexing Canada, but it’s a deal fraught with complexities for all.

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: No one saw Musk’s DOGE rampage coming or its threat

With no formal grant of authority, Musk is making cuts without fully understanding the consequences.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.