Kerry hasn’t been clear on Iraq

A constant bone of contention by presidential candidate John Kerry with regard to the Iraqi conflict is that he would have enjoined a broader coalition than is currently on board. To date he has yet to name the countries that he would have been able to bring on board. It should be noted that the only major European allies not to join the coalition are France, Germany and Russia. It should also be noted that the aforementioned three all voted as U.N. Security Council members against our Iraqi proposal.

It is a matter of record that these three countries were primary providers of arms and/or technical services for Saddam’s Iraq in spite of U.N. sanctions. Their complicity began even prior to the first Iraqi war when Kuwait was invaded and continued on until the current conflict. It would appear that their negative vote in the U.N. was most likely to protect their economic investment.

The question then is how would Kerry enlist these dissenters for a broader coalition. We do know that both France and Germany have stated they want no part of the current Iraqi situation and Russia has its hands full at home. There is no question that they would entertain a piece of the reconstruction pie. If these major three are out of the picture, then who is Kerry referring to?

Another time-bomb regarding France, Germany and Russia is just how deeply they, as well as others, are involved in the U.N. Iraqi oil for food scandal which is currently under investigation, reluctantly by the U.N. and sincerely by the U.S. Congress. Rumors are rampant but only time will tell, assuming a massive cover-up is not effective.

RAY DORBOLO

Everett

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Comment: Trump can go only as far as the courts will allow

Most of Trump’s executive orders are likely to face court challenges, setting the limits of presidential power.

Comment: Civil service needs reform; Trump means only to gut it

It’s too difficult to hire and fire federal workers. A grand bargain is possible, but that’s not what Trump seeks.

Saunders: U.S. Iron Dome isn’t feasible now, but it could be

Trump is correct to order a plan for a system that would protect the nation from missile strikes.

Harrop: Trump has no sense of damage from tariff threats

Even if ultimately averted, a trade war with Canada and Mexico could drive both from U.S. exports.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

A press operator grabs a Herald newspaper to check over as the papers roll off the press in March 2022 in Everett. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Push back news desert with journalism support

A bill in the state Senate would tax big tech to support a hiring fund for local news outlets.

A young man carries water past the destroyed buildings of a neighborhood in the Gaza Strip, Feb. 2, 2025. President Donald Trump’s proposal to “own” the Gaza Strip and transfer its population elsewhere has stirred condemnation and sarcasm, but it addresses a real and serious challenge: the future of Gaza as a secure, peaceful, even prosperous place. (Saher Alghorra/The New York Times)
Comment: ‘Homeland’ means exactly that to Gazans

Palestinians have long resisted resettlement. Trump’s plan to ‘clean out’ Gaza changes nothing.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Rent stabilization can keep more from losing homes

Thank you to The Herald Editorial Board for its editorial, regarding rent… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.