Let’s get terms, concepts straight

With over 10 years experience working in the “health insurance industry,” I would like to address points brought up by a Tuesday letter writer about the “public option.”

Many believe Congress has some sort of super-duper, top-secret, special health insurance plan that only “they” can get. This is not the case. Members of Congress are offered the exact same health insurance options that all federal employees are, the same one my own mother has as a retired federal employee. It is not some special, exclusive benefit plan that Larsen is “keeping to himself,” Every federal employee has access to this plan. If anyone wants this same coverage all they have to do is get a job with the federal government.

The letter mentioned a “cap” on charges and the belief that all providers should be reimbursed the same rates for every patient. It actually is not a “cap” as she envisions it, but a contracted rate, agreed to between the provider and the particular insurance carrier paying the bill. Since every insurance carrier negotiates separately with every provider, there is no one single standard rate for anything. A “cap” as she is suggesting would be creating a single payer system — something everyone screams is not acceptable.

Like the majority of Americans, Larsen’s is an employer-sponsored plan, a benefit of his employment. If Americans want a “true” public option, we need to once and for all sever the connection between employers and their sponsoring of our health insurance. With the millions who have lost their jobs and as a result their health insurance, this should be obvious, but it apparently is not.

In reforming what we have, we need to separate the two to truly make it “portable,” as one of the “P’s” in HIPPA (Health Insurance Privacy &Portability Act) stands for.

Dorenda Wilson

Shoreline

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Nov. 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: From opposite ends of crime, a plea for justice reform

A survivor of crime and an incarceree support a bill to forge better outcomes for both communities.

Comment: Misnamed Fix Our Forest Act would worsen wildfire risk

The U.S. Senate bill doesn’t fund proven strategies and looks to increase harvest in protective forests.

Comment: City governments should stay out of the grocery market

Rather than run its own grocery stores, government should get out of the way of private companies.

Forum: Grading students needs shift from testing to achievement

Standardized tests are alienating students and teachers. Focus education on participation and goals.

Forum: Varied interests for ecology, civil rights can speak together

A recent trip to Portland revealed themes common to concerns for protecting salmon, wildlife and civil rights.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Nov. 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Editorial: Welcome guidance on speeding public records duty

The state attorney general is advancing new rules for compliance with the state’s public records law.

The Buzz: Shutdown? What shutdown? We’ got 20,000 emails to read.

Trump was tired of talking about affordability, until emails from a former friend were released.

Schwab: Democratic Party was caught between caving and caring

Those who ended the shutdown ended the challenge but restored vital benefits, because Democrats care.

A state income tax is fair and can fund our needs

The constant tug-of-war between raising taxes and cutting spending is maddening. The… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.