Lease terms for Housing Hope project should have been noted

I am writing in regard to the recent article published in The Herald detailing the proposed housing development on Norton Playfield (“With neighbor input Housing Hope rethinks playfield plan,” The Herald, July 25). In the article, it is stated that the field is being leased to Housing Hope, but it does not mention the details of the lease. This is a 3-acre property that the Everett School District is leasing for $1 per year for 75 years. In other words, they are giving it away.

However, in almost the same breath, they are asking Everett taxpayers to approve a $317 million bond. How is this possible? How can the ESD disrespect taxpayers hard-earned money like this? This field could be sold for an extremely large sum or used in some other way that could garner income for the school district and alleviate some of the burden on taxpayers.

It is journalistically unprofessional to leave out such significant information that directly impacts the public.

Bliss Bartanen

Everett

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Sept. 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.

Editorial: With McCarthy, Auditor’s Office now able watchdog

Pat McCarthy has restored morale and overseen efforts that provide greater access to audit findings.

A Boeing Co. 737 Max 9 jetliner is shown, parked at the company’s manufacturing facility in Renton, in March 2017. (David Ryder / Bloomberg).
Comment: 737 Max crisis a debacle, but it won’t be Boeing’s end

Even as it’s commercial jet lines have struggled, its military work should carry it through turbulence.

Comment: Homebuilders need help to meet housing demand

All levels of government need to ease restrictions, build public housing and provide incentives to builders.

Most Read