Let middle class keep stoking the economy

  • David Broder / Washington Post columnist
  • Saturday, April 17, 2004 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — OK, so you’ve finished filing your income tax return for this year, and maybe you’re one of the many expecting a nice refund check from the government. So you’re feeling pretty good about the three years of tax cuts delivered by President Bush and the Republican Congress.

There are some skeptics who argue that the celebration is premature and unwise. We’ll get to them in a moment. But first let me tell you that the Treasury wants you to know that you’ve done your country a great service by accepting these reductions in your federal tax bill.

The Treasury Web site features a "Tax Day Reminder: Millions of Individuals and Families Are Benefiting From Tax Relief Plan." As good a deal as this has been for taxpayers, the agency says, "the cumulative effect on the economy is just as strong, laying the groundwork for increased economic growth and job creation. … By the last quarter of 2003, the tax relief signed by President Bush had:

"Reduced the unemployment rate by nearly 1 percentage point below where it would have been otherwise.

"Increased the jobs available to Americans by as many as 2 million.

"And increased the real GDP (Gross Domestic Product) by as much as 3 percent."

Treasury Secretary John Snow, in a speech earlier this month, pronounced himself "encouraged by what I see on the direction of our economy. We’re clearly on the right path and there can be no doubt that President Bush’s leadership on tax cuts has made the biggest difference. When combined with low interest rates, the Bush tax cuts are having the intended impact."

To bolster their claims, Snow and the president both have cited the encouraging figures that show the economy grew at a 6 percent rate in the last half of last year — the best such period in 20 years. But when the secretary says "there can be no doubt" about the beneficial effects of the Bush tax cuts, he ignores the skeptics who are out there.

Last week, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank whose expertise commands broad respect, issued what it called "a comprehensive assessment of the Bush administration’s record on cutting taxes." The authors, Isaac Shapiro and Joel Friedman, make two main points:

The tax cuts have reduced federal revenues to the lowest percentage of the economy since 1950, causing more than half the staggering $477 billion budget deficit.

Most of the benefits have gone to the richest households. Middle-income taxpayers are saving an average of $647 this year, boosting their income by a bit more than 2 percent, while millionaires are saving $123,592 — a bonus of more than 6 percent.

As for the stimulative benefits to the overall economy, the authors argue these tax cuts have produced relatively little "bang for the buck."

"For three years," they say, "the administration has been claiming its tax cuts would boost employment. But for three years, actual job growth has fallen far short of administration expectations." By their calculation, the job growth since the passage of the latest Bush tax cut in 2003 has been less than one-third that promised by the White House.

Reconciling all these conflicting numbers — or choosing among them — is beyond my capacity. But as Congress ponders the president’s request to make all of the past three years’ tax cuts permanent, one point stands out.

The middle-class tax cuts that Snow and others in the administration like to highlight should be extended. Members of Congress of both parties, including presumptive Democratic nominee John Kerry, agree that the new, low 10 percent tax bracket, the expanded child tax credit and the relief from the "marriage penalty" should be continued.

But if Shapiro and Friedman are correct, these three tax breaks "account for just one-third of the costs of tax cuts over time." These three provisions provide all but $100 of the tax cuts the typical middle-income family will receive this year. On the other hand, the wealthiest 1 percent are receiving an additional $33,672 in tax breaks from the other provisions Bush wants to make permanent — provisions that give almost no direct benefit to the middle class.

The implication is clear: Keeping the middle-class tax breaks and letting the others expire would bolster the budget and reduce the inequities in our tax system. That’s something to ponder as you savor your refund.

David Broder is a Washington Post columnist. Contact him by writing to

davidbroder@washpost.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Rivian, based in Irvine, Calif., has introduced its new R2 models, smaller and more affordable SUVs. (Rivian)
Editorial: Open electric vehicle market to direct sales

Legislation would allow EV makers to sell directly to customers, making lease or purchase easier.

Comment: No one saw Musk’s DOGE rampage coming or its threat

With no formal grant of authority, Musk is making cuts without fully understanding the consequences.

Douthat: Trump is chasing off lawyers he’ll need at some point

The deal to clear Adams serves Trump only as a way of identify whom he can consider loyal in the DOJ.

President Donald Trump listens alongside Elon Musk as he explains the administration’s cost-cutting efforts in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, on Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025. Musk has for weeks posted on social media about government spending, often amplifying and seeding false information. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)
Comment: This crisis can’t be left to courts alone

The courts can uphold the law, but they can’t match the speed of the executive branch in tearing down systems.

Eco-nomics: Climate change is making insurance a risky bet

Keeping home insurance affordable amid climate change will take adaptation to threats and broader efforts.

The Buzz: When you gotta boogie, best to shake it off, kid

A pasquidadian review of the week’s news.

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: U.S. and Canada better neighbors than housemates

President Trump may be serious about annexing Canada, but it’s a deal fraught with complexities for all.

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Stick with solutions to homelessness that have heart

A friend of mine, a poet from Leningrad who was born during… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.