Letters section offers a wide range of views

As we’ve said before, managing the Letters to the Editor section is not an exact science. And despite what some readers might think, there is no conspiracy afoot on the part of the editorial board, either.

This popular feature offers an intriguing representation of this community’s political and social ideas, ranging from one end of the political spectrum to the other. That means there’s plenty of room for you to have your say – especially during election season.

Since this year boasts a hotly contested presidential race with some big state and local races, chances are the letters section is going to get heated. If you’ve scanned a page on a particular day and scratched your head wondering how we choose which letters to print and when, the following is offered as an explanation – and to provide some guidelines for writing your own letter to the editor.

Our primary goal is to run as many letters as we possibly can. We believe the letters section should reflect as many of your ideas and opinions as can fit in the limited space. We also try to run letters in the general order that we receive them. That’s why you might notice more letters supporting Candidate A on a given day and more letters supporting Candidate B several days later. Readers see a letter supporting the candidate they don’t like and that prompts them to write in response. If we waited to print an equal number of letters supporting each candidate, we wouldn’t get the page out every day.

Also, if only a few people write about one candidate while dozens write in about his opponent, printing a couple of each isn’t really fair to the writers who took the time to share their ideas. We print what we receive (as long as it meets basic qualifications and we have the space). If you don’t like what you’re reading, write a letter of your own.

No matter how hard we try, we simply can’t print every letter we receive and we do cut off letters when writers become repetitive after awhile. There’s no hard rule to this. We have to figure it out as we go along. Best bet: Get your letter in early.

To improve your chances of seeing your letter in the paper, take note:

The shorter the letter, the better. Definitely keep it 300 words or fewer. Always include your first and last name, residential address and daytime phone number. We will only print your first and last name and city of residence. All other information is kept private. Letters that do not meet these qualifications are rejected.

That’s all there is to it. Letters can be submitted by e-mail (the best option), fax or regular mail. Instructions are in the box under the “Letters to the editor” banner.

Happy writing – and reading.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Jan. 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Tina Ruybal prepares ballots to be moved to the extraction point in the Snohomish County Election Center on Nov. 3, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: A win for vote-by-mail, amid gathering concern

A judge preserved the state’s deadline for mailed ballots, but more challenges to voting are ahead.

caddyBurke: Work as a young caddy allowed a swing at life skills

Along with learning blackjack, Yiddish and golf’s finer points, it taught the art of observation.

Comment: From start, nation has relied on little ‘Common Sense’

Paine’s pamphlet laid out the case for independence, principles that the nation needed over its 250 years.

Comment: Wind energy scores win in court, but long fight ahead

A judge ruled against a Trump order to shut down a project, but projects still face his opposition.

Comment: Trump’s credit card cap would throw weakest to sharks

Trump’s demand would cut credit access for many borrowers, leaving them to even harsher options.

Comment: Keeping silence against injustice invites more injustice

Many fear consequences for speaking out, but far worse consequences are risked by tacit approval.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: No new taxes, but maybe ‘pay as we go’ on some needs

New taxes won’t resolve the state’s budget woes, but more limited reforms can still make a difference.

Washington state's Congressional Districts adopted in 2021. (Washington State Redistricting Commission)
Editorial: Lawmakers shouldn’t futz with partisan redistricting

A new proposal to allow state lawmakers to gerrymander congressional districts should be rejected.

Four people were injured in a suspected DUI collision Saturday night on Highway 99 near Lynnwood. (Washington State Patrol)
Editorial: Numbers, results back lower BAC for Washington

Utah’s experience backs Sen. John Lovick’s bill to lower the blood alcohol limit for drivers to 0.05.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Jan. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support of Everett schools’ bond, levy shapes student success

As a proud parent of daughters who began their Everett Public Schools… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.