Majority leaders strong, but driven by partisanship

  • David Broder / Washington Post columnist
  • Saturday, August 3, 2002 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — With Congress on its August break, it is possible to step back and note the distinguishing features of this session. The record of legislative achievement is decidedly mixed — with notable successes in response to the terrorist attacks and notable failures on matters from prescription drug benefits to budgetary discipline.

The mixed record is what one might expect, given the narrowness of the party majorities and the division between a Republican House of Representatives and a Democratic Senate.

What is truly distinctive about the performance this year is the remarkable strength of the majority leadership on both sides of the Capitol and the degree of discipline and cohesion displayed by House Republicans and Senate Democrats.

The leaders on the two sides — House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle — are not known for employing strong-arm tactics. Both are soft-spoken and affable, seekers of consensus and preachers of teamwork. But they have had notable success in keeping their diverse flocks working and voting together on major policy initiatives.

They have faced different challenges and have used different tactics. Once Vermont Sen. Jim Jeffords shed his Republican label in the middle of 2001 and dubbed himself an Independent, thus making Daschle the new majority leader, Hastert became President Bush’s principal agent on Capitol Hill. Time after time, Hastert and the House Republicans have voted first on administration bills, thus setting a marker the White House can use in its negotiations with the Senate.

Hastert enjoys having the leverage of a popular president, who has been willing to buttonhole members personally for support of administration bills. But the situation inevitably limits Hastert’s maneuvering room — meaning he cannot negotiate compromises that deviate very far from the White House policy line.

Still, compromises are often necessary. While the House Republican membership is overwhelmingly conservative — sometimes to the right of Bush — Hastert needs most of the 15 to 20 moderate Republicans to go along if the bills are not to be defeated on the floor.

Democrats would have you believe that it is the House Republican Whip, Tom DeLay of Texas, who bullies these New England and Upper Midwest Republicans into line. Certainly DeLay knows his business and is an excellent vote-counter. But my impression is that it is the affection and loyalty that Hastert commands which really keep the moderates from jumping ship on key issues.

Daschle’s situation is quite different, and his tactics are therefore dissimilar. He is very much on his own, an exposed target for White House charges of being an "obstructionist." His one-vote majority is even tinier than the narrow margin for error Hastert confronts.

While most of his fellow Democrats share his general liberal disposition on issues, the differences among them are enormous. The ideological gap from Paul Wellstone of Minnesota to Zell Miller of Georgia is one that could stretch Daschle into a contortionist. And his problems are compounded by two facts of Senate life: Any single senator can throw a monkey wrench into the proceedings by exploiting its arcane rules. And passage of most controversial measures requires 60 votes, meaning that Daschle has not only to unite the Democrats but lure 10 votes from the Republican side as well.

Yet he does so with some frequency. He does it because he is a patient listener, absorbing variant views and seeing where consensus is possible. And he has shown an exquisite sense of political timing, postponing issues when the climate of public opinion is hostile to his purpose, and prodding committee chairmen to strike quickly when the time is right.

While Hastert has happily let the president serve as the spokesman/salesman for the Republican agenda, Daschle has accepted — and largely mastered — a second role as the chief Democratic spokesman on television and in print.

The quality of the leadership in both chambers would be a national asset, if only both Hastert and Daschle were pulling in the same direction. Since the early days after 9/11, when the first counter-terrorism bills were being rushed through Congress, there has been almost no productive communication between them. Each is focused on his own chamber and, mightily, on protecting his own party’s majority in the coming election.

Neither one wants to go back to the minority status he knew all too well earlier in his career. So partisanship drives much of the daily agenda — as it does for this whole Congress.

David Broder can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Rivian, based in Irvine, Calif., has introduced its new R2 models, smaller and more affordable SUVs. (Rivian)
Editorial: Open electric vehicle market to direct sales

Legislation would allow EV makers to sell directly to customers, making lease or purchase easier.

President Donald Trump listens alongside Elon Musk as he explains the administration’s cost-cutting efforts in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, on Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025. Musk has for weeks posted on social media about government spending, often amplifying and seeding false information. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)
Comment: This crisis can’t be left to courts alone

The courts can uphold the law, but they can’t match the speed of the executive branch in tearing down systems.

Eco-nomics: Climate change is making insurance a risky bet

Keeping home insurance affordable amid climate change will take adaptation to threats and broader efforts.

The Buzz: When you gotta boogie, best to shake it off, kid

A pasquidadian review of the week’s news.

Stick with solutions to homelessness that have heart

A friend of mine, a poet from Leningrad who was born during… Continue reading

SAVE Act would restrict voting rights

As a mother, I am flabbergasted by the continued and increasing attacks… Continue reading

Solar for All program is very beneficial and should be kept

The recent Herald article about the $156 million grant for Solar for… Continue reading

Comment: Keeping health care fair, affordable as costs rise

Bills in the state Senate would look to control costs and keep decisions in the hands of providers.

Comment: Proposal takes a swipe at credit card swipe fees

State legislation would exempt taxes and gratuities from the fees that credit card firms charge businesses.

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: U.S. and Canada better neighbors than housemates

President Trump may be serious about annexing Canada, but it’s a deal fraught with complexities for all.

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.