Make right call for safety

Is there a smart phone app that would interrupt a person and sternly instruct, “Hang up and drive!” “And use your blinker while you’re at it!”

Is there an app that would alert the Legislature to the fact that annual, incremental changes to the phoning-while-driving law do little to enhance safety?

For years, Sen. Tracey Eide, D-Federal Way, has doggedly introduced cell phone legislation, which finally resulted in our current law, which makes talking on a mobile phone while driving a secondary offense, meaning drivers must be pulled over for another infraction first.

This year, two bills being introduced would make holding a phone and driving a primary offense. But it would still be perfectly legal to use a hands-free device. (In 2006, text messaging behind the wheel was deemed a primary offense.)

Washington is one of six states and the District of Columbia that have cell phone laws, but is the only one of those that considers the use of a phone without a hands-free device a secondary offense.

Critics of the legislation, such as the cell phone industry, argue that drivers face many distractions while driving, and it’s unfair to pick on mobile phone users.

Apparently it’s only researchers and scientists, sounding like fuddy-duddy landline Luddites, who object to legislation that incorrectly assumes that using a hands-free device while driving is safer than using a cell phone, or safe at all.

Researchers point to studies that show as far as the brain is concerned, distraction-wise, there is absolutely no difference between using a cell phone or a hands-free device. And study after study shows that talking on a phone while driving makes a person as prone to errors as a drunken driver.

“It’s not that your hands aren’t on the wheel,” David Strayer, director of the Applied Cognition Laboratory at the University of Utah, told the New York Times. “It’s that your mind is not on the road.”

Belatedly, the National Highway Transportation and Safety Administration last year called for a complete ban on phoning and driving, but such a recommendation is only so much static to multitasking drivers and lawmakers.

(On the other hand, a study released last year showed that in states with laws banning cell phone use in cars, teens actually used their phones more.)

Certainly Washington’s cell-phone using drivers pay no attention to our law. It’s sometimes harder to spot a phone-free driver than vice versa. Making cell-phone use a primary offense, while encouraging the use of hands-free devices, won’t improve safety much, but should help the state coffers when police start issuing tickets.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, May 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

The Washington State Legislature convenes for a joint session for a swearing-in ceremony of statewide elected officials and Governor Bob Ferguson’s inaugural address, March 15, 2025.
Editorial: 4 bills that need a second look by state lawmakers

Even good ideas, such as these four bills, can fail to gain traction in the state Legislature.

A ‘hands-on’ president is what we need

The “Hands Off” protesting people are dazed and confused. They are telling… Continue reading

Climate should take precedence in protests against Trump

In recent weeks I have been to rallies and meetings joining the… Continue reading

Comment: Trump conditioning citizenship on wealth, background

Selling $5 million ‘gold visas’ and ending the birthright principle would end citizenship as we know it.

Comment: A 100% tariff on movies? How would that even work?

The film industry is a export success for the U.S. Tariffs would only make things harder for U.S. films.

Goldberg: Can Hakeem Jeffries and Democrats break through?

Struggling in the polls themselves, the Democrats’ leader says the focus is on comparisons with Republicans.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, May 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: What state lawmakers acheived this session

A look at some of the more consequential policy bills adopted by the Legislature in its 105 days.

Comment: To save the church, let’s talk nuns, not just popes

The church can save some parishes if it allows nuns to do the ‘field hospital’ work Pope Francis talked of.

Comment: RFK Jr.’s measles strategy leading U.S. down dark path

As misinformation increases, vaccinations are decreasing, causing a rise in the spread of measles.

Comment: Energy Star a boon to consumers; of course it has to go

In it’s 30-plus years it’s saved consumers $500 billion, cut carbon emissions and actually delivers efficiency.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.