Once a hunter pulls that trigger, there’s no do-over

Do you know what a “hunting accident” is?

A hunting accident is when you’re hunting and a volcano blows up behind you.

Poof. You’re gone. Nothing to be done. An accident pure and simple.

A hunting accident is when you’re under a tree and a branch chooses that moment to snap and level you.

Again, just one of those times when the stars align against you.

Those, and similar events, are hunting accidents.

It isn’t, however, an accident when one individual shoots another while hunting.

Sorry, but when that happens, some very basic rule was broken and what you’re now dealing with is a completely preventable tragedy.

Last week, Pamela Almli was out hiking. As she bent over to put something into her pack, a young teenage boy reportedly mistook her for a bear and shot her. Pamela Almli died and two families have now been permanently harmed — one through the needless loss of a loved one and the other because a 14-year-old boy, no matter the legal fallout, will, for the rest of his life, endure the pain of knowing that through some combination of inattention, inexperience, excitement, negligence or what have you, he killed another human being.

Want to know how long it takes to positively identify a target when you’re hunting? Simple. It takes every bit as long as you need to answer every darned question that had better be in your mind before you bring that firearm to your shoulder. In other words, you can never, ever shoot at “I’m pretty sure it’s this.” Nor, for that matter, can you even consider shooting at movement or sound.

As a good friend has said to me on many occasions, “I don’t quite know the sound or movement that identifies something as a game animal, but I’m sure I’ve made that noise or movement while I’ve been out there.”

So to be safe, here’s a suggestion that I borrowed from another hunter more than 30 years ago:

When you see something, hear something, or notice movement while hunting, train your mind so that your first thought is that what you see, the noise you hear, or the movement you notice is the one person that you love the most coming out to be with you. Do this and your first instinct will never be to aim a firearm at something you haven’t positively identified.

The bottom line in hunting is always this: If you’ve made up your mind to shoot, then you need to be somewhere well beyond certain that what you’re about to shoot at is precisely what you think it is. And here, a point needs to be made. The scope that sits atop many rifles and shotguns is not an identification tool. It is an aiming tool.

When you use that scope to look at something, you are also pointing your muzzle at that same thing. And if you justify this particular type of foolishness by saying that you have the safety on, then you could be hanging another person’s life on a mechanical device that’s been known to fail.

So, if you’re going to take up this sport, spend the money to buy a set of binoculars. When you buy those binoculars, make it a rule to use them religiously because you can never — absolutely never — aim a firearm at anything that you do not intend to kill.

If you can’t make this kind of commitment to identifying your target, then forget about hunting. You aren’t mature enough for this sport and we don’t need you out there.

Pamela Almli didn’t die because of an accident. She died because someone didn’t take the time to properly identify her. Further, no matter how much time was taken, it wasn’t anywhere near enough because someone is now dead — and if that sounds harsh, it’s because it’s meant to.

There are no “do-overs” once you pull a trigger. That bullet that you fired is now on a ballistic path and it will hit whatever it was pointed at no matter how badly you wish to call it back. That one, very simple point has been set in stone more times than I care to count.

Unfortunately, too many of those stones are found in cemeteries where they’re used to mark the graves of those needlessly gone.

Larry Simoneaux lives in Edmonds. Comments can be sent to larrysim@clearwire.net.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Dec. 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Electric Time technician Dan LaMoore adjusts a clock hand on a 1000-lb., 12-foot diameter clock constructed for a resort in Vietnam, Tuesday, March 9, 2021, in Medfield, Mass. Daylight saving time begins at 2 a.m. local time Sunday, March 14, 2021, when clocks are set ahead one hour. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
Editorial: Stop the clock on our twice-yearly time change

State lawmakers may debate a bill to adopt standard time permanently, ending the daylight time switch.

Schwab: Begging readers’ pardon, a defense of the ‘indefensible’

Considering the context of all that transpired, Biden’s pardon of his son is itself a pardonable sin.

Questions remain about new or refurbished home for AquaSox

I imagine I have read most of The Herald’s reportage on the… Continue reading

Sid Schwab back his opinion with facts, sources

The Herald recently printed a letter critical of columnist Sid Schwab. That… Continue reading

Black-and-white thinking: Choices and issues aren’t binary

A recent letter to the editor asked, “why are voters averse to… Continue reading

Comment: Musk’s DOGE plans can’t dodge Constitution

He and Ramaswamy think the Supreme Court will OK Trump’s usurping of Congress’ budget powers. It won’t.

The Everett Public Library in Everett, Washington on Thursday, Jan. 19, 2023. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
Editorial: What do you want and what are you willing to pay?

As local governments struggle to fund services with available revenue, residents have decisions ahead.

Children play and look up at a large whale figure hanging from the ceiling at the Imagine Children’s Museum on Wednesday, Oct. 26, 2022 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Making your holiday shopping count for even more

Gifts of experiences can be found at YMCA, Village Theatre, Schack and Imagine Children’s Museum.

FILE — Bill Nye, the science educator, in New York, March 5, 2015. Nye filed a $37 million lawsuit against Disney and its subsidiaries on Aug. 25, 2017, alleging that he was deprived of extensive profits from his show “Bill Nye, the Science Guy,” which ran on PBS from 1993 to 1998. (Jake Naughton/The New York Times)
Editorial: What saved climate act? Good sense and a Science Guy

A majority kept the Climate Commitment Act because of its investments, with some help from Bill Nye.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Dec. 5

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Tufekci: Without a law, your private data is up for grabs

Even location data from a weather app can be sold to police and scammers. Are you OK with that?

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.