Our troops have earned presumption of innocence

  • Larry Simoneaux / Freelance Columnist
  • Sunday, June 25, 2006 9:00pm
  • Opinion

I’m not sure just how angry I’m going to get about this one, but my blood’s already simmering and boiling isn’t all that far off.

I keep hearing and reading stories about our troops “murdering” innocent civilians or, in another instance, “massacring” people as payback for being attacked.

When I dig a bit deeper, I discover that not all of the facts are in, that some of the “witnesses” are suspect at best, and that circumstances surrounding these incidents may explain what happened and why.

But there are those who are unwilling to wait until the investigations are over. For myriad reasons, there are those who seem perfectly willing to believe the absolute worst about our troops and convict them solely on what’s been presented so far.

And that’s what gets me going.

If there’s one thing that’s been proven repeatedly throughout history, it’s that ugly things happen in war. Some are accidental. Some are avoidable. Some are wrong and deserve punishment.

Do innocents die in war? Do murder and massacre occur in war? Are there those in every army that’s ever existed who’ve committed atrocities?

The answer to each of those questions is yes.

But, as regards our troops, there are things that need to be said.

Ask anyone who’s ever been in uniform about the people they knew. They’ll answer by telling you about the sad sacks, slouches, shirkers and bunglers they knew. They’ll tell you about the pettiness and stupidity that they experienced. They’ll tell you about the martinets and incompetents that they served under.

But if you listen long enough, they’ll tell you something else. They’ll tell you about the men and women they served with who were some of the finest humans they’ve ever known. They’ll tell you that, if there’s ever been a nation whose armed forces are comprised of decent, courageous and ethical warriors, it is this one.

As regards combat, they’ll tell you that the efforts made by our armed forces to ensure that civilian casualties are prevented – even to the point of endangering their own lives – is often unbelievable. They’ll describe rules of engagement that were (and are) so restrictive as to make you wonder if we’re forcing our troops to fight, almost literally, with one arm tied behind their backs.

Yet they do it. And not only do they do it, they do it in ways that make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up in pride. They do it because they believe both in what this nation stands for and what the words “American soldier” mean.

So I get angry whenever I hear about murders and massacres having been committed and almost immediately see both a rush to judgment and an apparent eagerness on the part of some to believe that our troops are guilty.

What infuriates me further is when I don’t see a similar response whenever our enemies not only commit unspeakable atrocities, but also publicly revel in the barbaric acts they perform.

The bombing of mosques, theaters, restaurants, buses and schools is commonplace among them. Using women and children as human shields are standard tactics. Torturing and beheading helpless captives are normal and accepted parts of their game plan.

The mere fact that we are willing to bring charges against our own puts us light years ahead of these thugs in the field of morals, ethics and principles.

I know that there are those in our armed forces who are capable of war crimes. However, I also know that 99.99 percent of the rest are courageously performing a difficult task in a harsh environment half a world away from their loved ones. Because of that and for all of the reasons I’ve mentioned, I’m neither going to judge nor condemn those who’ve been charged until all of the facts are in.

In this nation, there’s supposed to be a presumption of innocence for those suspected of criminal acts. This presumption of innocence should extend most especially to those who’ve sworn to protect the rights the rest of us enjoy. It’s something they’ve earned at places like Lexington and Concord. Bull Run and Chickamauga. Chateau Thierry and Belleau Wood. Iwo Jima and Guadalcanal. North Africa and Normandy. Inchon and the Chosin Resevoir. Pleiku and Hue. Kuwait and Iraq. It’s something they’ve paid for in blood.

And as for those who are unwilling to afford these men and women that presumption of innocence, who seem willing and even eager to condemn, for all I care, they can go push a rope.

Larry Simoneaux lives in Edmonds. Comments can be sent to larrysim@att.net.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Friday, April 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Snow dusts the treeline near Heather Lake Trailhead in the area of a disputed logging project on Tuesday, April 11, 2023, outside Verlot, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Move ahead with state forests’ carbon credit sales

A judge clears a state program to set aside forestland and sell carbon credits for climate efforts.

Schwab: Honestly, the lies are coming in thick and sticky

The week in fakery comes with the disturbing news that many say they believe the Trumpian lies.

If grizzlies return, should those areas be off-limits?

We’ve all seen the YouTube videos of how the Yellowstone man-beast encounters… Continue reading

Efforts to confront homelessness encouraging

Thanks to The Herald for its efforts to battle homelessness, along with… Continue reading

Comment: Nostalgia ain’t what it used to be, nor was the past

Nostalgia often puts too rosy a tint on the past. But it can be used to see the present more clearly.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, April 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A new apple variety, WA 64, has been developed by WSU's College of Agricultural, Human and Natural Resource Sciences. The college is taking suggestions on what to name the variety. (WSU)
Editorial: Apple-naming contest fun celebration of state icon

A new variety developed at WSU needs a name. But take a pass on suggesting Crispy McPinkface.

State needs to assure better rail service for Amtrak Cascades

The Puget Sound region’s population is expected to grow by 4 million… Continue reading

Trump’s own words contradict claims of Christian faith

In a recent letter to the editor regarding Christians and Donald Trump,… Continue reading

Liz Skinner, right, and Emma Titterness, both from Domestic Violence Services of Snohomish County, speak with a man near the Silver Lake Safeway while conducting a point-in-time count Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024, in Everett, Washington. The man, who had slept at that location the previous night, was provided some food and a warming kit after participating in the PIT survey. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Among obstacles, hope to curb homelessness

Panelists from service providers and local officials discussed homelessness’ interwoven challenges.

FILE - In this photo taken Oct. 2, 2018, semi-automatic rifles fill a wall at a gun shop in Lynnwood, Wash. Gov. Jay Inslee is joining state Attorney General Bob Ferguson to propose limits to magazine capacity and a ban on the sale of assault weapons. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, File)
Editorial: ‘History, tradition’ poor test for gun safety laws

Judge’s ruling against the state’s law on large-capacity gun clips is based on a problematic decision.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.