Private space race needs innovation, not excess regulation

The following editorial appears on Bloomberg View:

Xcor Aerospace is offering a chauffeured ride into space for $95,000. SpaceX has an all-inclusive Mars package (round-trip, of course) for $500,000. And for half that price, Virgin Galactic will ferry people 68 miles above the Earth, beyond the reach of gravity.

None of these trips is available yet, however, and that last venture suffered a terrible setback when Virgin’s experimental SpaceShipTwo crashed in California’s Mojave Desert last week, killing its co-pilot. The incident was a sad reminder of the inherent dangers of space travel. But responding to it with elaborate new safety regulations could imperil an immensely promising new industry.

The Federal Aviation Administration issues licenses for space launches and permits for experimental flights. Since 2004, however, the agency has been prevented by law from regulating the design and operation of private spacecraft. The idea was to keep the FAA from obstructing the industry with well-meaning red tape while freeing companies to experiment with inventive new spacecraft.

That grace period may soon end. The provision preventing regulation is set to expire next year, and the FAA can write new rules in response to accidents, so the Virgin crash may lead to enhanced oversight. In September, the agency released a report that looked a lot like a blueprint for future safety mandates — and after last week’s calamities, Congress may prod it to do more to protect brave pilots like those on SpaceShipTwo.

That would be a mistake. The FAA should continue to ensure that the private space business doesn’t imperil the public. But ambitious experimentation remains vital to a young industry. Finding a sustainable business model would be harder if spacefarers were subject to anything like the rules that apply to the airline industry. And no amount of regulation can change the fact that space is a dangerous place — with clear risks for pilots and passengers alike.

Which suggests a more fundamental point. The history of human flight — from the Wright brothers to the de Havillands, from Chuck Yeager to Sally Ride — is one of risks taken, tragedies endured and ambitions realized despite the odds. The bravery of barnstormers and test pilots is part of the reason it’s now possible to fly from New York to London in a few hours, with little more to fear than jet lag and boredom.

The next phase of flight may be the most ambitious yet. Several billionaires are pursuing different approaches to reaching the cosmos — with varied designs, propulsion systems, business plans — and they should be free to innovate, make mistakes and try again. The dividends, for both science and commerce, could extend far beyond the business of ferrying rich tourists.

If they don’t want this promising era to end prematurely, Galactic and its peers will do everything possible to ensure the safety of their expensive spaceships and the humans inside them. The FAA, for its part, should continue to ensure public safety and offer advice — but otherwise should mostly just wish the spacefarers well.

Like their predecessors, this new generation of pioneers needs the freedom to experiment, even if it means taking serious risks. Let them go.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Editorial: Welcome guidance on speeding public records duty

The state attorney general is advancing new rules for compliance with the state’s public records law.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Nov. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Stephens: Antisemitism on right is nothing new; nor tolerable

William F. Buckley tried to beat it back twice. More conservatives need to step up to shut it down.

Harrop: It’s not votes or GOP support Trump seeks; it’s profit

Not even a year into his second term, Trump now is motivated by what others can do for him personally.

Brooks: A theory as to how Trump and others see themselves

A look at what’s behind the thinking of authoritarians and how they use that to order their worlds.

Comment: Red states may rue decision to gerrymander districts

The GOP weakened some seats to gain an advantage in others, but its 2024 coalition of voters may not hold.

Comment: Pennies’ end brings necesssary change to change

Not making cents — and nickels, too — makes financial sense for the country. Get used to rounding.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Nov. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Canceled flights on a flight boards at Chicago O’Hare International Airport in Chicago, on Friday, Nov. 7, 2025. Major airports appeared to be working largely as normal on Friday morning as a wave of flight cancellations hit the U.S. (Jamie Kelter Davis/The New York Times)
Editorial: With deal or trust, Congress must restart government

With the shutdown’s pain growing with each day, both parties must find a path to reopen government.

Welch: Taking the initiative for parents and fair play

Two proposed state ballot measures would strengthen parents’ rights and protect girls’ sports.

Comment: Here’s what ‘losing’ shutdown looks like for Democrats

They didn’t get an ACA deal, but they kept the economic message, leaving the GOP to answer for health care costs.

Saunders: Trump has himself to blame for Newsom’s Prop. 50 win

The president’s thirst for more GOP House seats sparked a backlash that Newsom can ride to 2028.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.