WASHINGTON – The self-flagellation over abuse reports at Guantanamo has turned into a full-scale panic. There are calls for the United States, with all this worldwide publicity, to simply shut the place down.
A terrible idea. One does not run and hide simply because allegations have been made. If the charges are unverified allegations, as they overwhelmingly are in this case, then they need to be challenged. The United States ought to say what it has done and what it has not done, and not simply surrender to rumor.
Moreover, shutting down Guantanamo will solve nothing. We will capture more terrorists and we will have to interrogate them, if not at Guantanamo then somewhere else. There will then be reports from that somewhere else that will precisely mirror the charges coming out of Guantanamo. What will we do then? Keep shutting down one detention center after another?
The self-flagellation has gone far enough. We know that al-Qaida operatives are trained to charge torture when they are in detention, and specifically to charge abuse of the Quran to inflame fellow prisoners on the inside and potential sympathizers on the outside.
In March, the Navy inspector general reported that, out of about 24,000 interrogations at Guantanamo, there were seven confirmed cases of abuse, “all of which were relatively minor.” In the eyes of history, compared to any other camp in any other war, this is an astonishingly small number. Two of the documented offenses involved “female interrogators who, on their own initiative, touched and spoke to detainees in a sexually suggestive manner.” Not exactly the gulag.
The most inflammatory allegations have been not about people but about mishandling the Quran. What do we know here? The Pentagon reports (Brig. Gen. Jay Hood, May 26) – all these breathless “scoops” come from the U.S. government’s own investigations of itself – that of 13 allegations of Quran abuse, five were substantiated, of which two were most likely accidental.
Let’s understand what mishandling means. Under the rules later instituted by the Pentagon at Guantanamo, proper handling of the Quran means using two hands and wearing gloves when touching it. Which means that if any guard held the Quran with one hand or had neglected to put on gloves, this would be considered mishandling.
On the scale of human crimes, where, say, 10 is the killing of 2,752 innocent people in one day and 0 is jaywalking, this ranks as perhaps a 0.01.
Moreover, what were the Qurans doing there in the first place? The very possibility of mishandling Qurans arose because we gave them to each prisoner. What kind of crazy tolerance is this? Is there any other country that would give a prisoner precisely the religious text which that prisoner and those affiliated with him invoke to justify the slaughter of innocents? If the prisoners had to have reading material, I would have given them the book “Portraits 9/11/01” – vignettes of the lives of those massacred on Sept. 11.
Why this abjectness on our part? On the very day the braying mob in Pakistan demonstrated over the false Quran report in Newsweek, a suicide bomber blew up an Islamic shrine in Islamabad, destroying not just innocent men, women and children, but undoubtedly many Qurans. Not a word of condemnation. No demonstrations.
Even greater hypocrisy is to be found here at home. Civil libertarians, who have been dogged in making sure that FBI-collected Guantanamo allegations be released to the world, seem exquisitely sensitive to mistreatment of the Quran. A rather selective scrupulousness. When an American puts a crucifix in a jar of urine and places it in a museum, civil libertarians rise immediately to defend it as free speech. And when someone makes a painting of the Virgin Mary, smears it with elephant dung and adorns it with porn, not only is that free speech, it is art – deserving of taxpayer funding and an ACLU brief supporting the Brooklyn Museum when the mayor freezes its taxpayer subsidy.
Does the Quran deserve special respect? Of course it does. As do the Bibles destroyed by the religious police in Saudi Arabia and the Torahs blown up in various synagogues from Tunisia to Turkey.
Should the United States apologize? If there were mishandlings of the Quran, we should say so, and express regret. And that should be in the context of our remarkably humane and tolerant treatment of the Guantanamo prisoners, and in the context of a global war on terror (for example, the campaign in Afghanistan) conducted with a discrimination and a concern for civilian safety rarely seen in the annals of warfare.
Then we should get over it, stop whimpering and start defending ourselves.
Charles Krauthammer is a Washington Post columnist. Contact him by writing to letters@charleskrauthammer.com.
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
