Region influenced like no other

Thanks to Jim Bronke, “Portrayals of Israel historically wrong,” and Kal Leichtman, “Nation was not created by the U.S,” for stepping into this minefield. Now I can poke around and stir things up without feeling guilty.

Rarely have the history, mythologies and cultures of a region been so influential, mimicked and widespread as those of the Middle East and the so-called “Holy Land.” It spawned three major religions that now claim over half the world’s population.

Many in this country see the story as divine chronological prophecy being played out. For many it is not just a place, but an idea.

And not necessarily a good one. OK, I’m an agnostic.

But whatever one’s personal beliefs, this rich tapestry can be acknowledged and studied.

The region, like others, has influenced and been influenced by successive waves of foreign powers. These histories often read like an ongoing Philip Zimbardo experiment of guards and prisoners. Is Hamas akin to the insurgent Jewish Sicari (dagger-men) that took Masada from the Romans, or more like the Amalekites that had to be exterminated? Identity is forged by the enemy.

I confess. I read Charles Krauthammer’s neo-conservative column because he’s articulately and unfailingly wrong. I like to know I can trust his consistency and it’s a good reason to rant.

Julie Muhlstein’s column, on the other hand, did not strike me as propagandizing for Zionism. In fact, it put a human face and name on a young Palestinian. It also shortened the distance from Everett to Gaza and the West Bank. The subject was skillfully more about empathy than politics or history.

Unfortunately the U.S. has lost all credibility in the area.

Which reminds me, did you guys notice, we’re living on Indian land? Oops, I’m out of words.

Wayne C. Evans

Bothell