Restoring the jewel that defines our region

  • By Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen
  • Friday, May 25, 2007 9:00pm
  • Opinion

With 2,800 square miles of inland waterways, 2,500 miles of shoreline, and rivers and streams winding through 12 counties, Puget Sound is a defining characteristic of our region. For many of us it defines not only where we live, but who we are.

Farmers and fishermen, inland residents and island-dwellers, recreational boaters and sailors serving our country – we all have a strong connection to the Puget Sound. Our community draws its spirit and economic strength from the beauty and bounty the Sound offers.

Not so long ago, much of Puget Sound was practically a wilderness and its waters were clean and healthy. But decades of abuse and neglect that have accompanied our region’s rapid growth now threaten its health. The fabulous place where many of us grew up is in danger of becoming a very different place for our children and grandchildren.

An advisory body was created by the governor in 2005, and worked for a year to develop a strategy to protect and restore the health of Puget Sound by 2020. One of its main recommendations was to create a permanent agency to focus on collaborative efforts to ensure the long-term success of improving the ecology of Puget Sound.

Focusing on that recommendation, the 2007 Legislature developed a solution to address those needs. Working together with input from a variety of community groups, we settled on a plan which passed with broad, bipartisan support.

Senate Bill 5372 establishes the Puget Sound Partnership to pull together existing recovery efforts, develop an action agenda and promote strong involvement by citizens around the Sound. The partnership will be led by a leadership council and will work closely with regional watershed groups around the Sound to provide better collaboration and long-term strategic planning.

With dozens of state agencies, federal agencies, local governments, not-for-profits and other environmental organizations already addressing the environmental health of Puget Sound, it makes no sense to ignore such resources. By coordinating the efforts of these groups, the Puget Sound Partnership will find the gaps and ensure that all work promotes the confidence and cohesion we need to create a healthier Puget Sound.

But what makes this a real “partnership” is the degree to which it will rely upon local communities and stakeholders for input on what needs to be done, as well as how to do it. Groups such as WSU Island County Beach Watchers already have the skills and experience of fostering awareness of our island environments through education, and Washington Shore Stewards have led by example to encourage waterfront and stream-side property owners to apply basic habitat-friendly concepts to create healthier waters and shores for birds, fish and wildlife. Groups like these will be vital in emphasizing that education rather than regulation is what will make the Puget Sound Partnership succeed.

A key part of this partnership is a leadership council that will be responsible for defining an action agenda and setting priorities to make sure we have a healthy Puget Sound by 2020. An independent science panel will also help set goals and benchmarks to measure progress.

Cleaning up the Sound is an ambitious goal, and the Puget Sound Partnership approaches it in the right way. It starts with a blueprint for success by setting specific long-term goals and establishing the objectives by which those goals will be achieved.

The goals which the Puget Sound Partnership will focus on include:

* a healthy human population supported by a healthy Puget Sound that is not threatened by changes in the ecosystem;

* a quality of human life that is sustained by a functioning Puget Sound ecosystem;

* healthy and sustaining populations of native species in Puget Sound, including a robust food web;

* a healthy Puget Sound where freshwater, estuary, nearshore, marine and upland habitats are protected, restored and sustained;

* an ecosystem that is supported by groundwater levels as well as river- and stream-flow levels sufficient to sustain people, fish, wildlife and the natural functions of the environment; and

* fresh and marine waters and sediments of a sufficient quality so the waters in the region are safe for drinking, swimming and other human uses and enjoyment, and are not harmful to the native marine mammals, fish, birds and shellfish of the region.

To accomplish these goals, the Puget Sound Partnership will focus on: providing water for people, fish and wildlife, and the environment; improving water quality and habitat by managing storm-water runoff to reduce toxins and pathogens entering Puget Sound fresh and marine waters; protecting ecosystem biodiversity and recovering imperiled species by restoring habitat functions and values; and protecting existing habitat and preventing further losses.

The Puget Sound is our home. It’s a part of who and what we are. It unites us. By bringing together input and action from government agencies, environmental organizations, local community and not-for-profit groups, farmers and property owners, the Puget Sound Partnership will ensure the vitality of the Sound for generations to come.

State Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen, D-Camano Island, represents all of Island County and parts of Snohomish and Skagit counties.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Dec. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speaks alongside President Donald Trump during an event announcing a drug pricing deal with Pfizer in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Sept. 30, 2025. Advisers to Kennedy appear poised to make consequential changes to the childhood vaccination schedule, delaying a shot that is routinely administered to newborns and discussing big changes to when or how other childhood immunizations are given. (Pete Marovich/The New York Times)
Editorial: As CDC fades, others must provide vaccine advice

A CDC panel’s recommendation on the infant vaccine for hepatitis B counters long-trusted guidance.

Welch: State’s business climate stifling; lawmakers aren’t helping

Now 45th for business in a recent 50-state survey, new tax proposals could make things even worse.

Douthat: White House needs more Christianity in its nationalism

Aside from blanket statements, the Trump administration seems disinterested in true Christian priorities.

Comment: Renewing ACA tax credits is a life or death issue

If subsidies aren’t renewed, millions will end coverage and put off life-saving preventative care.

Comment: CDC vaccine panel’s hep B reversal leads parents astray

It isn’t empowering parents to make their own decision; it’s misleading them in a dangerous direction.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Dec. 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: FDA’s vaccine memo reckless, dangerous to public health

It offers no supporting evidence for its claims of children’s deaths and talks vaguely of broad changes.

Bouie: Support efforts of those helping meet needs in your area

In every committee, groups strive to meet the needs of others who lack proper shelter and nutrition.

French: Immigrant outreach answers current darkness with light

New Life Centers of Chicago answers the call in Leviticus to love the stranger as one’s self.

Comment: Using SNAP as leverage was bad idea first time around

The White House says it intends to suspend food aid in blue states that refuse to surrender data on recipients.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.