Riverfront project is folly on all levels

Government hubris at its best!

Does anyone in our local government really understand “peak oil”?

How about “global climate change”?

Peak oil is here. It includes decreasing global oil production, geopolitical conflicts and global economic collapse. These are the three main indicators many experts predicted would happen as peak oil hits.

I ask these questions because of the continued “pro-development” agenda. Everett has an extremely expensive project on its agenda, the riverfront development. The rest of the country is in the midst of massive job loss, economic collapse, housing foreclosures, banks and industries falling, etc. Yet Everett is spending millions on “A new Riverfront neighborhood”? Make sense to you? We have existing infrastructure needs!

They also are ignoring climate changes we are experiencing. Whether you call it “global warming,” “global climate change” or see it as a natural occurrence, you have to admit that we have experienced more flooding in recent years. Many climate experts predict more severe weather patterns to come. Building along a river, on its estuary and flood plain make absolutely no sense whatsoever. You can do all the environmental impact studies you want and you can open dikes upriver to help alleviate flooding downstream (draft environmental impact statement, city of Everett marshland subarea plan), but the bottom line is we have enough evidence to show that this project is nonsense economically and environmentally. Let’s learn how to take care of what we have now and live content with what we have instead of trying to have more in the future.

If you are concerned about how the city is spending your money, join other local concerned citizens at 6:30 p.m. Tuesday at the Weyerhaeuser Room in the Everett Station.

Ron Toppi

Everett

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

**EMBARGO: No electronic distribution, Web posting or street sales before Saturday at 3:00 a.m. ET on Mar. 1, 2025. No exceptions for any reasons. EMBARGO set by source.** House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, (D-NY) speaks at a news conference about Republicans’ potential budget cuts to Medicaid, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Feb. 27, 2025. As Republicans push a budget resolution through Congress that will almost certainly require Medicaid cuts to finance a huge tax reduction, Democrats see an opening to use the same strategy in 2026 that won them back the House in 2018. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Editorial: Don’t gut Medicaid for richest Americans’ tax cuts

Extending tax cuts, as promised by Republicans, would likely force damaging cuts to Medicaid.

Comment: Learning costs of ignoring environment the hard way

EPA chief Lee Zeldin can’t flip a switch on protections, but we’ll lose precious momentum on climate.

Comment: What promise to ‘review the data’ could mean for health

Noncommittal responses from the FDA nominee show a willingness to follow Trump’s whims, not science.

Two workers walk past a train following a press event at the Lynnwood City Center Link Station on Friday, June 7, 2024, in Lynnwood, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Open Sound Transit CEO hiring to public review

One finalist is known; the King County executive. All finalists should make their pitch to the public.

Sen. Noel Frame, D-Seattle. (Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Hold clergy to duty to report child abuse

Teachers, health care providers and others must report suspected abuse. Clergy should as well.

Polgreen: ‘A kind of vandalism’ threatens the First Amendment

There’s a message in the arrest of a legal resident who protested for Gaza: you have no right to speak.

Collins: How well have you followed Trump 2.0’s initial days?

Honestly, if you get a perfect score, why have you not already applied for Canadian citizenship?

FILE — Smog in the Manhattan borough of New York on Thanksgiving Day, Nov. 24, 1966. A century ago, a well-ventilated building could be a bulwark against disease, but with the arrival of COVID-19, when buildings could barely breathe, Americans gained a renewed appreciation for the health benefits of clean air. (Neal Boenzi/The New York Times)
Comment: What a loss of clean air rules could cost us

For more than 50 years, the rules have been a benefit to the economy as much as Americans’ health.

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, March 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Cmobine state retirement systems to save $600M

Sen. June Robinson’s Senate Bill 5085 passed the Senate Floor on March… Continue reading

End of foreign aid will hurt U.S. reputation

In the spring of 2004, as reports of cruelty and torture of… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.