Robinson: Don’t underestimate the possibility of ‘Oprah 2020’

Trump taught us a lesson about political novices, but many have misjudged Winfrey’s skills before.

By Eugene Robinson

Wow, it looks like “a new day is on the horizon!” If Democrats decide to fight fire with fire, that is.

When Oprah Winfrey delivered that line at the climax of her thunderous Golden Globes speech, my reaction was the same as everyone else’s: Is it my imagination, or does that sound like a well-crafted slogan for a presidential campaign?

I quickly told myself nah, no way, she wouldn’t. But then her longtime partner, Stedman Graham, told the Los Angeles Times she just might. “It’s up to the people,” he said. “She would absolutely do it.”

CNN later quoted two unidentified friends of Winfrey as saying that for several months she has been “actively thinking” about running. Step back for a moment and consider where we’ve come: If I’d told you five years ago that the 2020 presidential race would be Oprah versus The Donald, you’d have insisted I seek professional help. But today, who can rule it out?

President Trump’s biggest accomplishment may have been to make the political waters safe for celebrities with 100-percent name recognition and zero government experience. At this point, who’s to say that Winfrey couldn’t run? Or that she couldn’t win?

I admit to having mixed feelings about the prospect. On the one hand, Trump’s abysmal performance in office proves, as if it needed proving, that experience is a good thing for a president to have. On the other, for the sake of the nation and the world, somebody has to beat Trump in 2020 — and it’s not as if the Democratic Party has a lineup of potential candidates that begin to match Winfrey in charisma and star quality. I’m assuming she’d run as a Democrat, since that’s where her worldview and sensibilities best fit.

If you wonder why anyone is taking the Oprah-for-president idea seriously, go back and listen to that speech. I think of myself as pretty hard-bitten and jaded, but I found it inspirational — even thrilling.

Winfrey’s delivery wasn’t the soft, enfolding, personal empathy of “Oprah on the couch.” It was “Oprah on a soapbox” — bold and full of vigor. When she raised her volume and used repetition to declare the end of the era when powerful men could abuse women with impunity — “But their time is up. Their time is up. Their time is up.” — I thought it sounded almost like a campaign speech. When she ramped the energy and emotion even higher with her “new day is on the horizon” proclamation, I no longer had any doubt that I was hearing political oratory of a very high order. And I confess that I had a lump in my throat.

We know a bit about Winfrey’s politics. Her major impact to date was her May 2007 endorsement of candidate Barack Obama — at a time when Hillary Clinton was the odds-on favorite to win the Democratic nomination. Winfrey made her first campaign appearances on Obama’s behalf in December of that year, and it is logical to assume that her support won him votes in the primaries, though it is not possible to know how many.

She endorsed Clinton in 2016. Trump had said at one point that he would love to have Winfrey as his running mate, but she said on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” that if he actually asked, her response would be, “Donald, I’m with her” — echoing a Clinton campaign slogan.

Some Democrats — and a few “Never Trump” Republicans, such as Weekly Standard editor-at-large Bill Kristol — reacted to the Golden Globes speech by using the Twitter #imwithher hashtag to tout Winfrey as a candidate.

Response from the Hollywood luminaries who witnessed the speech firsthand inside the Beverly Hilton ballroom was little short of rapturous. For Americans traumatized by the Trump presidency, Winfrey’s address hit all the right notes. It offered hope — a commodity that has been in desperately short supply.

Back to reality. One big question is why Winfrey would even consider a presidential run. It would require nearly three years of grinding hard work — and in the end she might win, which would mean four more years of oppressive labor and crushing responsibility. The life of a billionaire media mogul is much more pleasant than the life of a president.

And the most important question of all: Could she actually be a good president? After Trump, we have to be skeptical of all political novices. But we should also be mindful that many people have underestimated Winfrey during the course of her long career. All have regretted it.

Eugene Robinson’s email address is eugenerobinson@washpost.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Jan. 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - In this Aug. 28, 1963 file photo, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., head of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, speaks to thousands during his "I Have a Dream" speech in front of the Lincoln Memorial for the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, in Washington. A new documentary “MLK/FBI,” shows how FBI director J. Edgar Hoover used the full force of his federal law enforcement agency to attack King and his progressive, nonviolent cause. That included wiretaps, blackmail and informers, trying to find dirt on King. (AP Photo/File)
Editorial: King would want our pledge to nonviolent action

His ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail’ outlines his oath to nonviolence and disruptive resistance.

The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., left, appears at a Chicago news conference with Buddhist monk Thich Nhat Hanh on May 31, 1966. AP Photo/Edward Kitch, File
Comment: In continuing service to King’s ‘beloved community’

A Buddhist monk and teacher who built a friendship with King, continued his work to realize the dream.

Forum: Continuing Dr. King’s work requires a year-round commitment

We can march and honor his legacy this weekend, but we should strive for his dream every day.

Comment: History’s warnings about those who cling to power

More than 65 years ago, a rift between civil rights leaders might have ended the movement itself.

Stephens: Iran’s leaders falling to their own antisemitism

The regime would rather pursue a perpetual jihad against Israel and Jews than feed its own people.

Lozada: Two questions podcasters, moderators should stop asking

How did we get to the point where ‘How did we get here?’ seemed a useful way to start a discussion?

A Microsoft data center campus in East Wenatchee on Nov. 3. The rural region is changing fast as electricians from around the country plug the tech industry’s new, giant data centers into its ample power supply. (Jovelle Tamayo / The New York Times)
Editorial: Meeting needs for data centers, fair power rates

Shared energy demand for AI and ratepayers requires an increased pace for clean energy projects.

Tina Ruybal prepares ballots to be moved to the extraction point in the Snohomish County Election Center on Nov. 3, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: A win for vote-by-mail, amid gathering concern

A judge preserved the state’s deadline for mailed ballots, but more challenges to voting are ahead.

Why approval of Everett Schools’ bond, levy is so important

As a former Everett School Board director, I understand public school funding… Continue reading

Welch column: Hopes for state shouldn’t be tall order

I hope that Todd Welch’s dreams for the 2026 Legislature come true… Continue reading

toon
Eitorial cartoons for Sunday, Jan. 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.