Robinson: Trump fiddles with matches as the world burns

The president isn’t just refusing to address climate change; he’s eagerly trying to accelerate it.

By Eugene Robinson

Climate change is happening “primarily as a result of human activities” and its damaging impacts — severe droughts, deadly wildfires, monster tropical storms, punishing heat waves — “are already being felt in the United States.” That’s not me talking. It’s the conclusion of the U.S. government, in an alarming new report the Trump administration doesn’t want you to read.

It can be no accident that the 1,656-page “Impacts, Risks and Adaptation” section of the latest blue-ribbon National Climate Assessment was released on the day after Thanksgiving, a graveyard of a news cycle when many Americans are focused on turkey sandwiches and Black Friday deals.

The report provides stunning new evidence for what we already knew: President Trump’s climate-change policy — ignore, obfuscate, delay, deny — amounts to environmental vandalism on a tragic scale.

Surely aware of what was coming, the president used his Twitter feed on Wednesday to pose as a weatherman and launch a preemptive attack: “Brutal and Extended Cold Blast could shatter ALL RECORDS — Whatever happened to Global Warming?”

Answer: It’s here, it’s all around us, and it’s getting worse.

Since the beginning of the 20th century, the report notes, global average temperature has increased by 1.8 degrees and global average sea level has risen by about 8 inches. These changes are accelerating. By the year 2100, if action is not taken to curb carbon emissions, the temperature rise could total 9 degrees and the sea level rise could exceed 4 feet.

Trump and other deniers can no longer claim with a straight face that no warming is taking place, since nine of the hottest 10 years on record have come since 2005. Instead, they try to blame some as-yet unknown natural cycle. But the new climate assessment notes that “observational evidence does not support any credible natural explanations.”

Instead, “the evidence consistently points to human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse or heat-trapping gases, as the dominant cause,” according to the report. As I have shouted until I am blue in the face, the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide has risen from around 280 parts per million at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution to more than 400 parts per million now. That is an astonishing 40 percent increase since humankind began burning fossil fuels on a massive scale.

This is no coincidence and involves no guesswork. Scientists can directly and precisely measure carbon dioxide concentrations during past eras by drilling ice cores in Antarctica or Greenland and analyzing air bubbles trapped within. According to records maintained by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, ice cores show that over the past 800,000 years, levels of atmospheric carbon fluctuated between 170 and 300 parts per million, until recently zooming off the charts.

Resist any temptation to write all this off as scientific gobbledygook. Pay attention to the numbers, which are important and not very hard to follow. Denialist officials and commentators who throw up their hands and say “I’m not a scientist” are being disingenuous. There is no real scientific debate about the existence of climate change or the fact that human activity is driving it.

There is, however, a political debate about what to do. Trump is determined to accelerate climate change by boosting the production and use of coal — the “dirtiest” widely used fuel, in terms of carbon emissions — and keeping oil prices low. This is the dumbest, most short-sighted policy imaginable.

Trump visited California to see first-hand the destruction of the horrific Camp Fire, which killed at least 85 people — with the death toll expected to rise as more remains are found — and destroyed more than 14,000 homes. According to the new climate assessment, the cumulative forest area burned in the western United States by wildfires since 1984 is fully double what it would have been if climate change had not occurred.

No, wildfires are not getting worse because not enough raking is being done, as Trump weirdly insisted. They are getting worse because of climate change.

So are tropical storms, flash floods and heat waves. Trump claims to be all about economic growth. But the new report predicts that “climate change is expected to cause growing losses to American infrastructure and property and impede the rate of economic growth over this century.” It adds that “annual losses in some economic sectors are projected to reach hundreds of billions of dollars.”

The report sounds one more ominous note: Thus far, climate scientists’ dire predictions have proved to be conservative. The world is on fire. We have a president who plays with matches.

Eugene Robinson’s email address is

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Sept. 24

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

2022 Election campaign buttons with the USA flag - Illustration
Editorial: Cummings best choice for next county prosecutor

Rogers offers a fresh outlook, but Cummings’ tenure in the office is now needed to meet challenges.

2022 Election campaign buttons with the USA flag - Illustration
Editorial: Shavers in 10th, Cortes in 38th House districts

The editorial board begins its endorsements with two state House races in newly redrawn districts.

A display at the Everett Public Library's downtown branch shows books that have been banned or removed from shelves at other public and school libraries in the country over the years (Jon Bauer / The Herald)
Editorial: Everett, Sno-Isle libraries protect right to read

Both library systems strive to offer a selection of books and match readers with the right book.

Handmade signs along U.S. 2 thanked firefighters for the efforts to control the Bolt Creek wildfire. (Edie Everette)
Forum: What we took with us and what we left for the fire

An evacuation from wildfire focuses the mind on how life might change and who you’re thankful for.

Forum: Sarcastic anonymous call about column makes my point

What I heard in a voicemail after asking people to listen to each other and not respond with vitriol.

Comment: One vote shows little seperates GOP and its fringe

Only eight House Republicans voted for electoral count reforms. Why? Because Liz Cheney backed it.

Comment: How do we judge the nuclear threat posed by Putin?

There are reasons Putin would or wouldn’t use his arsenal. We are relying on the judgment of someone who has shown little.

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Sept. 23

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Most Read