Sales-tax deduction is a matter of fairness

It might have seemed like Christmas had come in October when Congress passed and President Bush signed the restoration of the federal deduction for state and local sales taxes. For the first time since 1986, Washingtonians who itemize their federal tax returns will be allowed to deduct the substantial sums they pay each year in sales tax.

But this shouldn’t be seen as a gift from Uncle Sam. In truth, it’s a much overdue move toward fairness.

Sen. Maria Cantwell and Rep. Brian Baird deserve applause for co-authoring and pushing this change. There’s work yet to do, however, because the provision has only been approved for the 2004 and 2005 tax years. Cantwell, Baird and others in Congress now must see that this deduction is made permanent.

Washington is one of eight states that have no state income tax. When Congress eliminated the deductibility of sales taxes in 1986, taxpayers in those eight states were unfairly penalized because of the way their states collect revenue. While taxpayers who paid state income taxes were allowed to continue deducting them from their federal returns, folks in Washington essentially were assessed a huge tax increase.

Now, Washington taxpayers who itemize their federal returns are expected to save an average of $300 to $500 by taking advantage of deductions included in an IRS table. Those who save receipts and deduct what they actually pay in sales taxes could save more, perhaps hundreds more.

The windfall is figured to pump some $500 million into a state economy that could use the boost.

Already, though, there is talk that President Bush might propose doing away with the sales tax deduction to help reduce the budget deficit. We favor deficit reduction, but it must be done fairly. If all deductions of state and local taxes are eliminated, including income taxes, the burden would be shared evenly. Fairness must be a fundamental principle in any federal tax-system overhaul.

President Bush, whose home state of Texas is one of the eight that have no income tax, shouldn’t have any problem buying into that idea.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, July 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Retain Escamilla, Binda on Lynnwood City Council

Escamilla was appointed a year ago. Binda is serving his first term.

Blame Democrats’ taxes, rules for out-of-state ferry contract

Gov. Bob Ferguson should be ashamed of the hypocrisy shown by choosing… Continue reading

Letter used too broad a brush against Democrats

In response to a recent letter to the editor, this Democrat admits… Continue reading

Kristof: Women’s rights effort has work to do in Africa, elsewhere

Girls in Sierra Leone will sell themselves to pay for school. The feminist movement has looked away.

French: Supreme Court hits a vile industry with its comeuppance

While disagreeing on the best test, the justices agreed on the threat that porn poses to children.

Comment: When ‘politically correct’ becomes ‘Trump approved’

Companies and reporters are seeing the consequences of using words the president doesn’t approve of.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, July 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A Volunteers of America Western Washington crisis counselor talks with somebody on the phone Thursday, July 28, 2022, in at the VOA Behavioral Health Crisis Call Center in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Dire results will follow end of LGBTQ+ crisis line

The Trump administration will end funding for a 988 line that serves youths in the LGBTQ+ community.

Welch: A plan to supply drugs to addicts is a dangerous dance

A state panel’s plan to create a ‘safer supply’ of drugs is the wrong path to addiction recovery.

Douthat: Conservatives sacrificed own goals to pay for tax cuts

Along with its cuts to Medicaid, long-held GOP priorities were ignored in the Big Beautiful Bill.

Comment: Supreme Court porn ruling a naked change to speech rights

The majority ignored a 20-year-old ruling that overturned an age-verification law similar to the Texas law.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.