Saunders: Were 2 Democrats ‘asking questions’ or ‘burning books’?

The letter to big tech giants appeared to threaten the broadcasts of Fox News and similar outlets.

By Debra J. Saunders / Las Vegas Review-Journal

Democratic House members are using the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill riot and the coronavirus pandemic in a scary effort to censor conservatives; and get Big Media to do their dirty work for them.

Remember when the left believed in more speech as the solution to bad speech? Those days are gone.

Last Monday, Reps. Anna Eshoo and Jerry McNerney, both California Democrats, sent letters to the chief executives for cable providers, satellite providers and other platforms to voice their issues with conservative news outlets Fox News, Newsmax and One America News Network.

The letters asked executives of such giants as AT&T, Comcast, Amazon and Verizon what they are doing to “reduce the spread of disinformation, including encouragement or incitement of violence by channels your company disseminates to millions of Americans.”

And the letters asked the CEOs if they plan on carrying the three conservative networks beyond “any contract renewal date.” Hint. Hint.

“The letter is not just chilling; it’s positively glacial,” George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley warned during Wednesday testimony before a House Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.

No surprise, in their crusade to combat “misinformation,” the letter’s authors swam in murky waters.

To make their point, Eshoo and McNerney wrote, “One popular television show aired a segment about OANN last April that included a dire warning: ‘the kind of misinformation (OANN) is spewing right now could end up getting people killed.” The popular show? “Last Week Tonight with John Oliver,” hosted by a comedian.

The letter also cited Media Matters — a left-wing propaganda group — as an authoritative source, accusing Fox of broadcasting what it called “misinformation” 253 times over a five-day period. An example: “Fox pushed for school re-openings 34 times despite public health concerns.”

It’s not good when those who pose as enemies of misinformation cannot distinguish between fact twisting and unwelcome opinion. Weak thinkers with lazy arguments are not the people you want determining who gets on cable TV or the internet.

The Democrats’ focus on conservative media only overlooks the fact that every news organization makes mistakes. Sometimes the mistakes involve simple error. Others involve honest mistakes facilitated by bias. Others are the result of bad judgment. After all the bogus stories on Trump campaign collusion with Russia in 2016, Democrats should know that discretion is the better part of valor.

At the hearing, Eshoo took issue with critics who said that the letters violated The First Amendment.

“The First Amendment, my friends, starts with four words, ‘Congress shall make no laws,’” Eshoo said. And how dare anyone question the probity of House members “asking questions.”

Actually, that’s five words, congresswoman. And if the letters merely asked questions, no one would raise an eyebrow.

“Making a statement and putting a question mark at the end of it, doesn’t change the import of the statements,” Turley testified. The House Democrats’ questions sent “a rather audible statement.”

“What if you succeed?” Turley asked. Voters would lose access to Fox News, the most watched news network last year because House Democrats decided they could decide what other people read or watch.

They’re book burners, and they don’t even know it. Or they just don’t care.

Follow @DebraJSaunders on Twitter.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, April 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Eric Brossard displays his commemorative Drug Court graduation coin that reads, "I came with hope, worked and learned. I have a new life. A life that I've earned." (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Court ruling requires focus on addiction treatment

A court decision allows for a more effective and affordable solution to substance use disorder.

An architectual illustration shows the proposed Learning Resource Center at Everett Community College. The centerAn architectual illustration shows the proposed Learning Resource Center at Everett Community College. The center would replace the college's Libary Media Center, built in 1988. The Senate capital budget proposal allocates $48 million for its construction, while the House budget includes no funding for it. (Courtesy of Everett Community College) would replace the college's
Editorial: Capital budget a bipartisan boost for communities

House and Senate proposals are substantial and needed, but final talks should secure an EvCC project.

Ian Terry / The Herald

Glass art by Merrilee Moore is seen at the Sorticulture Festival in Everett on Friday, June 9, 2017.

Photo taken on 06092017
Editorial: A return to live events if covid’s spell is broken

Everett’s Sorticulture, July 4th and other events are on the calendar, but infections need better control.

Comment: State can lead the switch to electric vehicles

Legislation will set a specific goal for EV sales by making sure infrastructure is in place.

Comment: We built roads for Henry Ford; do the same for EVs

Biden’s infrastructure plans for electric vehicles are how we keep up with technological change.

Comment: Right-wing media’s ‘no angel’ narrative needs to end

Implying Derek Chauvin’s innocence by blaming George Floyd for his own death is a long-practiced trope.

Comment: Biden’s two-track economy addresses work divide

The U.S. is facing challenges as work splits further between making things and caring for people.

Downtown Everett needs public restrooms

I wholeheartedly agree with Trgyve Anderson’s and Pastor Jeremy Fuerst’s letter to… Continue reading

Most Read