Saunders: What limits are GOP voters setting for Trump?

Support for the former president remains, but blind obediance and tolerance have been worn down.

By Debra J. Saunders / syndicated columnist

Ahead of and after the 2020 presidential election, a number of my friends who also are Republican women engaged in what came to be known as “The Conversation.”

As special House Committee hearings on the Jan. 6 Capitol attacks have begun, there’s a new conversation in the air.

In 2016, many Republican women I know — men, too — told each other they didn’t vote for Donald Trump because they didn’t like the way he talked and tweeted. But also, they weren’t sure Trump would govern from the right.

Some voted for Libertarian Gary Johnson. Others wrote in the names of whomever they’d prefer as the GOP nominee.

But in 2020, we voted for Trump. We liked his Supreme Court picks, his foreign policy and his approach to economics. I especially appreciated how he ignored the experts and pushed for rapid vaccine development.

We voted for Trump because, unlike Trump, we didn’t let our egos dictate our politics.

I told myself that I would vote for Trump but would not change my standards for him.

After he lost in November, Trump kept bumping up against those standards.

During the infamous Jan. 6 rally, Trump told supporters to “demand that Congress do the right thing and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated” (according to his definition) and “get rid of the weak” members of Congress.

His definition of “weak” naturally meant: strong enough to stand up to Trump.

After supporters stormed the Capitol and attacked police, America found out how many Republicans didn’t fit Trump’s description: 139 House Republicans and eight senators cast votes against certifying President Biden’s victory.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy was one of the 139, because he is not so much a leader as the head hostage.

Every time the California Republican shows any distance from Trump, the former president yanks the leash and brings the leader to heel.

On Tuesday, a small tear in Trump’s hold on the GOP came to light when his chosen candidate lost a primary battle in Texas.

Also Tuesday, four heroes — Washington, D.C., police officers Michael Fanone and Daniel Hodges, as well as Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn and Sgt. Aquilino Gonell — testified about the physical and verbal abuse they endured at the hands of the Trump mob.

Fanone found mercy only when he told his tormentors he had children. Dunn, an African American, testified that it was the first time anyone called him the n-word while he was in uniform.

The decent response would be to voice sympathy with these four officers. McCarthy instead spoke as if he were the victim when he claimed he couldn’t put in solid Republicans such as Rep. Jim Jordan on the panel. Jordan, you see, challenged House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats for not providing sufficient security.

“On Jan. 6, these brave officers were put into a vulnerable and impossible position because the leadership at the top failed,” McCarthy told reporters.

GOP strategist Alice Stewart likened that criticism to “arsonists blaming the firefighters for not bringing enough water.”

If party leaders aren’t doing everything possible “to win back the white suburban voters, we’re not going to win,” Stewart told me.

So, here’s The Conversation going forward. For 2022 and 2024, support for Trump is optional, but blind obedience is over. Or the GOP can get used to losing. It’s a choice.

Debra J. Saunders is a fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Chapman Center for Citizen Leadership. Contact her at dsaunders@discovery.org.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Feb. 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

30,000 coho salmon await release at the Hatchery and Environmental Education Center at Halls Lake in Lynnwood on April 5, 2019. (Kevin Clark / The Herald)
Editorial: Set deadline for chemical in tires that’s killing coho

A ban set for 2035 allows ample time to find a viable replacement for 6PPD, which kills salmon and trout.

Welch: Millionaires tax is pie-crust promise; easily broken

By Democrats’ own admission, they can’t be trusted to tax only millionaires with new income tax.

De Rugy: Wealth taxes won’t satiate states’ hunger for revenue

Promises to tax only the wealthy fall short when lost opportunities hit lower-income families.

Comment: Putin doesn’t want peace; he’s playing for more time

The U.S. and Europe need to deny Russia the ability to wait out Ukraine. Economic pressure should be increased.

Comment: We honor civil rights heroes only when time allows comfort

The demands of MLK and others made them unpopular in their day. Their challenge to us remains.

Comment: Focus on inflation misunderstands affordability fears

Inflation has eased, but wage growth and job openings have slowed, adding to families’ budget concerns.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Dowd: Many close to AI’s recent developments are leaving

It’s those who are staying, counting on wealth and power and telling you not to worry, who should concern you most.

Comment: Big Oil loses shield as Trump frees it from regulation

Ending emissions regulations seems like a victory, but it exposes the industry to Big Tobacco-like lawsuits.

Harrop: Trump can ignore climate crisis; he won’t be here for it

But your children and grandchildren will be around to see the effects of our poor stewardship.

Kristof: Trump’s crypto deal with UAE blows lid off Teapot Dome

The Harding-era scandal is nothing compared to Trump’s favorable deal exporting computer chips to the Emirates.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.