Seek facts before editorializing

Regarding the Wednesday editorial, “Troubling questions linger”:

As the defense attorney on the Langendoerfer case, I have never received a solicitation for comment or information from your newspaper. Thus, I was shocked when I read that you “know what happened” with Galindez’s murder because the “witnesses told police the same story.”

I reviewed over 1,800 pages of discovery, interviewed one witness for four hours, another for two hours, interviewed numerous other peripheral witnesses, and scoured phone records and I did not encounter a single consistent version of events. It is amazing that your editorial writer can be so confident in a theory that the state lacked such confidence in that they reduced the charge two times over — especially when you have not requested or had access to any first-hand information on the case.

It would be helpful for your readers to know the following facts: 1) the witnesses had markedly different stories about how Galindez died, none of which matched the forensic evidence; 2) two of the three witnesses fled to Mexico immediately after speaking with police not for fear of Langendoerfer, but because they feared that Britney’s gang would kill them because the gang believed those witnesses killed Britney; 3) the defense had a medical expert prepared to testify that Ms. Galindez was dead before she hit the water and did not have a single wound consistent with stabbing; 4) the “witnesses” each had a record of repeatedly lying to the police about this case prior to coming up with their final contradicting stories; 5) one of the state witnesses used the victim’s cell phone on his mother’s plan for weeks after telling the police he had no idea where the phone was, then he sold it to a cousin who continued to use it until police caught him with a secret warrant.

It is a tragedy that Ms. Galindez died a violent death, but it is similarly tragic that in America in 2009 the free press does not give a damn about the real facts.

Sonja K. Hardenbrook

Everett

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, July 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Retain Escamilla, Binda on Lynnwood City Council

Escamilla was appointed a year ago. Binda is serving his first term.

Blame Democrats’ taxes, rules for out-of-state ferry contract

Gov. Bob Ferguson should be ashamed of the hypocrisy shown by choosing… Continue reading

Letter used too broad a brush against Democrats

In response to a recent letter to the editor, this Democrat admits… Continue reading

Kristof: Women’s rights effort has work to do in Africa, elsewhere

Girls in Sierra Leone will sell themselves to pay for school. The feminist movement has looked away.

French: Supreme Court hits a vile industry with its comeuppance

While disagreeing on the best test, the justices agreed on the threat that porn poses to children.

Comment: When ‘politically correct’ becomes ‘Trump approved’

Companies and reporters are seeing the consequences of using words the president doesn’t approve of.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, July 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A Volunteers of America Western Washington crisis counselor talks with somebody on the phone Thursday, July 28, 2022, in at the VOA Behavioral Health Crisis Call Center in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Dire results will follow end of LGBTQ+ crisis line

The Trump administration will end funding for a 988 line that serves youths in the LGBTQ+ community.

Welch: A plan to supply drugs to addicts is a dangerous dance

A state panel’s plan to create a ‘safer supply’ of drugs is the wrong path to addiction recovery.

Douthat: Conservatives sacrificed own goals to pay for tax cuts

Along with its cuts to Medicaid, long-held GOP priorities were ignored in the Big Beautiful Bill.

Comment: Supreme Court porn ruling a naked change to speech rights

The majority ignored a 20-year-old ruling that overturned an age-verification law similar to the Texas law.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.