Serious questions about floodplain

An enormous joint effort to “restore” wetlands by the state Department of Fish and Wildlife and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers revives some serious questions about the future of Marshland and the Snohomish tidal floodplain. (Nov. 4 article, “Wetlands future is muddy.”) The proposed flooding of north Marshland for salmon conservation would cost over $300 million, as one of 11 projects totaling $1.1 billion.

The projects’ relative secrecy to date was rightly questioned by lowland owner Pete Landry at South Lowell. A quiet profile with heads down is well justified by Fish and Wildlife’s record here. Plans to enhance salmon by farmland flooding on Drainage District No. 6, Ebey Island and Smith Island have failed outright or aroused severe criticism from experts actually knowledgeable of those areas. Fish and Wildlife planners have never demonstrated with research that salmon smolt can thrive in warmed shallow waters of flooded lowlands. Blind planning that destroys farmland and historic legacies has few friends among lowland farmers, residents and regional leaders with vision of the future.

Realistically, some part of what the agencies seek through “restoration” could be attained through precepts of environment-integrated agriculture. As a floodplain landowner myself, and a lifetime ag researcher, I believe that the options of integrated fish/farmer co-prosperity for the entire Puget Sound venue could be researched at less than 1 percent of the project’s $1.1 billion.

Future planners for north Marshland wold be wise to investigate the conservations efforts already made there. A bright point in Lowell’s recent history was a multiple-use farmland project on the late Elwin Anderson property near Pete Landry’s farm. Certain community garden plots there were Cornell-textbook examples of soils care and vegetable production. To my knowledge, the Lowell project was the first among Everett’s neighborhoods — and indeed in Snohomish County — to include plots directed specifically to research on atmosphere conservation, water conservation and biomass energy production.

Alex G. Alexander

Everett

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Jan. 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A Microsoft data center campus in East Wenatchee on Nov. 3. The rural region is changing fast as electricians from around the country plug the tech industry’s new, giant data centers into its ample power supply. (Jovelle Tamayo / The New York Times)
Editorial: Meeting needs for data centers, fair power rates

Shared energy demand for AI and ratepayers requires an increased pace for clean energy projects.

Schwab: Or: How I learned to stop worrying and love the Don

As I have always said, the facts side with Trump and his team; on the ICE fatal shooting and more.

Kristof: ‘We’re No. 1”? How does 32nd of 171 countries sound?

Regardless of presidential administration, the nation’s standing on several measures has dropped over the years.

Comment: Decency demands Good’s death be mourned, investigated

Neither side of the tragedy can claim to know all; that’s what an independent investigation is for.

Comment: How Trump’s 3 architects have aided in nation’s decline

Stephen Miller, Russell Vought and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have shepherded the most damaging policies.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Jan. 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

State must deliver on promises for state ferry system

Washington State Ferries’ crew shortages continue to cancel crucial sailings on Mukilteo-Clinton… Continue reading

State can’t tax income if robots take jobs

A recent Herald Forum commentary was essentially about how, “Everyone knows that… Continue reading

Comment: What Vance doesn’t get about ‘heritage’ or Americans

Ask the Founders or many who fought for the nation, immigrants are in every sense American.

Comment: Why Trump isn’t likely to back democracy in Venezuela

Based on Trump’s stated desire for control of the country’s oil, his best bet is its current autocracy.

Comment: Are we trending toward another devastating Dust Bowl?

It’s not a certainty, but heat and drought are more frequent in the U.S., upping the odds of the disaster’s return.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.