Social Security represents the best of American ideals

My grandmother died in February, at the age of 100. Until she was 95, she lived in a mobile home in Vancouver, Wash., that she and my grandfather purchased just before his death in 1971. My grandparents worked hard and lived frugally, but their son’s serious illness and a disastrous fire wiped out their savings. For decades, Social Security provided most of my grandma’s income. She didn’t have much money, but she always looked elegant, had homemade cookies for her grandchildren, and gave to charity.

I thought about my grandmother when the annual report of the Social Security trustees came out last week. The report projects the program’s finances through 2085. As a whole it shows that Social Security is fundamentally healthy, but the introduction produced by political appointees warns of looming financial problems.

The report projects that when my sons, who are just entering the workforce, reach retirement age, both workers and retirees will have considerably more buying power than they do today. In 2050, Social Security taxes at the current level will finance benefits for the typical retiree worth more than $20,000 in 2008 dollars. Today’s average annual benefit is $12,800.

Unfortunately, a reader has to wade through hundreds of pages and apply enough math to pass the seventh-grade WASL to arrive at that reassuring conclusion. Even more unfortunate, the years of propaganda by Social Security’s opponents have convinced many Americans that the system is in trouble. Most young people I talk to assume that Social Security won’t be there for them. And why wouldn’t they, when the press and politicians from both parties have parroted the “crisis” line for years?

I have good reason to champion Social Security. Both my grandmothers lived well passed 90. Because their basic needs were covered, my parents could invest in educating their children and saving for their own retirement. I was able to go to college, and now don’t have to worry about supporting my parents. And 11 years ago my husband died suddenly. Our sons were 9 and 11, and I was in a “mommy-track” job. Until my boys turned 18, we received survivors benefits, allowing me as a single mom to maintain financial stability. I will always be grateful.

Social Security is one of the great gifts bequeathed to us by earlier generations of Americans. Here in Washington, nearly 1 million people — 15 percent of our population — rely on Social Security. That total includes 82,000 widows and widowers, 130,000 disabled workers, and 66,000 children, along with retirees.

One of the great things about Social Security is that benefits are based on both how much you contributed as a worker and how much you need. Married couples get higher benefits than singles, and those with dependent kids get even more. Benefits for seniors last for life. And when a young worker dies leaving dependent children, or becomes disabled, the family can count on benefits.

Contrast this with private retirement plans. Half the workforce has nothing, and most of those with a plan have a 401(k) or the like, where retirement benefits depend on a combination of how much you earn and pure luck. No matter how wisely you invest, no one can guard against swings of the economy that may wipe out a large portion of savings just when you reach retirement.

Savings can also run out, if you have the misfortune to live too long. No one could have predicted that my grandma would be the one out of her eight siblings to make it to 100. And if a young parent dies, the younger the children, the less retirement savings there will be to help support those kids.

Fortunately, Americans had the good sense to roundly reject President Bush’s privatization scheme. Now the presidential race gives us the chance to debate our core values. For me, Social Security represents the best of American ideals. It affirms that we each have a responsibility to contribute, all work has value, everyone deserves to live in dignity, and all of us have a stake in the well-being of our neighbors. The mantra of this election may be change, but Social Security is a fundamental American institution we need in the 21st century.

Marilyn Watkins, policy director of the Economic Opportunity Instititue (www.eoionline.org), writes every other Wednesday. Her e-mail address is marilyn@eoionline.org.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Feb. 8

A sketechy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Comment: Democracy depends on support of local journalism

A state bill provides funding to support local news outlets through a modest tax on tech businesses.

Comment: Love is intoxicating; romance doesn’t have to be

Navigating sobriety while dating, with Valentine’s Day coming up, is possible and fulfilling.

Comment: State attempt at single-payer health care bound to fail

Other states have tried, but balked when confronted with the immense cost to state taxpayers.

Forum: Requiem for a lost heavyweight: Sports Illustrated

SI, with Time and NatGeo, were a holy trinity for me and my dad. Now, it’s a world of AI clickbait.

Forum: Political leaders should leave trash talk to ballplayers

Verbal intimidation is one thing on the basketball court; it shouldn’t have a place in our politics.

The Buzz: Why, no, we have complete trust in Elon Musk

But whatever he and Trump are doing to the country, could they please wish it into the cornfield?

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

A press operator grabs a Herald newspaper to check over as the papers roll off the press in March 2022 in Everett. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Push back news desert with journalism support

A bill in the state Senate would tax big tech to support a hiring fund for local news outlets.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Feb. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.