State bill on internet privacy would result in confusion

I saw the April 25 letter to the editor (“Federal rules still protect online privacy”) from Jonathan Spalter about online privacy and had to comment. Recently I testified in Olympia about congressional action on privacy protections. In spite of the headlines, the effort to roll back Obama administration rules did not change privacy protections for broadband users. Quite the contrary. Congress’ action ensured that protections remained consistent across the ecosystem avoiding confusion for consumers. However, that same confusion is threatening Washingtonians in recently introduced House Bill 2200. HB 2200 would only compound confusion over consumer privacy protections.

The facts remain that Internet users’ privacy protections are the same today as they were a year ago. There has been absolutely no loss of consumer privacy protections. In fact, the Federal Trade Commission has long been the expert and chief cop on the beat. To that end, internet service providers (ISPs) have privacy policies that protect customer data consistent with the FTC’s battle-tested privacy framework, covering transparency, consumer choice, security, and data breach notifications.

If adopted, House Bill 2200 would create new restrictions that would apply to ISPs, but not content providers who have more access to consumer information. They would be allowed to continue to collect and utilize information as before. This arrangement would leave consumers unsure of what their protections are and when and where they are actually protected. Let’s avoid confusion and provide consumers consistent federal standard of privacy protections, not a state-by-state patchwork.

Tom Gurr

Pacific Technology Alliance


Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Friday, March 24

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Cathlamet, the Washington State Ferry that crashed in Seattle last month, sits at the Port of Everett on Thursday, Aug. 25, 2022, in Everett, Washington. The ferry will require extensive repairs after a hard landing crumpled one corner of the boat at the Fauntleroy dock on July 28. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: State needs quicker route for its new ferries

‘Build in Washington’ can be scraped as a mandate, while still counting benefits of in-state shipyards.

Department of Natural Resources regional manager Allen McGuire, left, and acting bolder unit forester Tyson Whiteid, right, stand next to marker on land recently purchased by the DNR for timber harvest on Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2019 in Gold Bar, Wash. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Use state forestlands to ‘farm’ carbon credits

Legislation would allow the DNR to sell carbon offsets to fund reforestation and other climate work.

Getty Images, sundial
Editorial: Indifference risks loss of access to public records

Members of the state’s Sunshine Committee are questioning how much others value its work.

Schwab: Trump’s GOP defenders get busy in face of Stormy weather

While assuring no one is ‘under the law,’ Trump’s excuse team are already obfuscating and misdirecting.

Kids can pass along environmental lessons to adults

What a great article by Julie Titone reegarding climate change education! (“Amid… Continue reading

Make climate investments from carbon credit auction count

Washington’s landmark cap-and-invest program has begun to generate revenue through its first… Continue reading

Fox News is selling its viewers on a fantasy

Neither Stormy Daniels nor any of her colleagues in the sex industry… Continue reading

Comment: Arkansas makes it easier to hire kids at slaughterhouses

When teens as young as 13 were found cleaning meatpacking plants, Arkansas eased its child labor laws.

Most Read