State must settle on a test for graduation

It’s story problem time. Please get out a No. 2 pencil and remember to show your work. Begin:

Ann will be a high school senior in 2016. In order to graduate, Ann will have to take the current test used to measure her proficiency as well as a new test based on the new national common core standards that will be used to determine if Ann is ready for college. State schools superintendent Randy Dorn wants the Legislature to drop the current test and use the new test starting in 2016, saving the state $30 million over the next two-year budget cycle. Dorn also doesn’t want to make passage of the test a requirement for graduation. Meanwhile, the state Board of Education isn’t sure it wants to drop testing as a graduation requirement, but does want to drop as a requirement that high school seniors pass a biology exam to earn a high school diploma. Instead the board wants a more comprehensive science standard for graduation.

How many bottles of aspirin will Ann, her parents and her teachers go through waiting for state officials and the Legislature to settle on a method to measure student achievement and determine if Ann and her fellow students are ready for college, work and life after high school?

Dorn’s concerns about administering two tests to students are understandable. These tests are time-consuming and nerve-wracking for all concerned, particularly the students. Expecting them to take two sets of tests — even though they only have to pass one of them to graduate — is unreasonable. That’s not to mention the amount of classroom time two sets of tests will steal from students and teachers. If dropping one of the two tests can save the state $30 million, all the more reason to do so.

Dorn would rather that the new common core test be administered in the 11th grade, allowing the results to show where a student needs remediation during his or her senior year. But Dorn doesn’t want the test result to be used as a graduation requirement.

We disagree. Testing should always be used as a tool that shows where a student and teachers need to concentrate further study. But a certain level of proficiency on a test, when combined with a student’s overall record of achievement, ought to continue to be used as a graduation requirement.

Likewise, a comprehensive science standard makes more sense than a biology test alone.

But can we stop moving the target every few years for students and teachers? How long ago was it that the WASL was the final word on testing?

At some point, state officials, education experts and the Legislature need to settle on a testing standard and a method of measuring proficiency and stick with it.

If we can’t do that for our students, we’ve fully earned a failing grade.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, May 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Sarah Weiser / The Herald
Air Force One touches ground Friday morning at Boeing in Everett.
PHOTO SHOT 02172012
Editorial: There’s no free lunch and no free Air Force One

Qatar’s offer of a 747 to President Trump solves nothing and leaves the nation beholden.

Comment: Governor should veto change to mortgage interest deduction

A provision in state tax legislation would increase mortgage costs for families buying homes.

Comment: Fair’s fair; kids get 3 dolls, Trump wants 3 jets

Trump’s tariffs require austerity from Americans, except when Trump sees a shinier aircraft on the tarmac.

Comment: Welcome South African refugees, yes, but Afghans, too

There has been no good explanation why Afrikaners are admitted, when so many others are turned away.

Goldberg: Is RFK Jr.’s MAHA movement suffering irony deficiency

His pick for surgeon general is faltering because she isn’t attacking vaccines earnestly enough.

Comment: Nonprofits filling gap left by federal cuts isn’t answer

Relying solely on donors to fulfill needs means providers no longer are accountable to the people.

The Washington State Legislature convenes for a joint session for a swearing-in ceremony of statewide elected officials and Governor Bob Ferguson’s inaugural address, March 15, 2025.
Editorial: 4 bills that need a second look by state lawmakers

Even good ideas, such as these four bills, can fail to gain traction in the state Legislature.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: What state lawmakers acheived this session

A look at some of the more consequential policy bills adopted by the Legislature in its 105 days.

Liz Skinner, right, and Emma Titterness, both from Domestic Violence Services of Snohomish County, speak with a man near the Silver Lake Safeway while conducting a point-in-time count Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024, in Everett, Washington. The man, who had slept at that location the previous night, was provided some food and a warming kit after participating in the PIT survey. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: County had no choice but to sue over new grant rules

New Trump administration conditions for homelessness grants could place county in legal jeopardy.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, May 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Welch: Local elections work best when voters prepare for task

With ballots set, now’s the time to study issues and ask candidates where they stand and what they’ll do.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.