State voters will face stark contrasts in November

Successful campaigns appeal to our aspirations, promising better times ahead. From Bill Clinton’s “don’t stop thinking about tomorrow” to Barack Obama’s “audacity of hope,” would-be change agents look forward. Successful office-holders also highlight the next day’s opportunities, as Ronald Reagan did with “morning in America” in his bid for re-election in 1984.

But despite the rally music and filtered sunrises, each election amounts to a referendum on the present, on the policies and programs of the incumbent majority.

In their rematch, Chris Gregoire and Dino Rossi face challenges quite different from those posed in their 2004 contest. Gregoire will run on her gubernatorial accomplishments. Rossi must simultaneously challenge that record and sell us on his alternative future.

Across the state, campaigning legislators will either tout or trash the legislative legacy to win support. Democrats will pledge to fulfill their commitments. Republicans will promise necessary midcourse corrections.

Gregoire completed her bill-signing last week, concluding the work of the most, well, ambitious Legislature in memory. According to WashingtonVotes.org, lawmakers introduced 4,355 bills, 3,495 amendments, and passed 852 laws since the Legislature was seated in 2007. Statistics, however, fail to convey the scope of legislative ambition.

This Legislature has done more to expand state government than any since 1993, when lawmakers adopted a state-run health-care plan (never fully implemented and largely repealed) and substantial new taxes. Although the 1993 session lingers in insider memory as the highwater mark for liberal legislation here, today’s lawmakers arguably have surpassed their record.

Consider just three policy areas: health care, climate change and paid family leave. In each, Democrats demonstrated their distrust of private markets by expanding regulation and government programs.

Two years of health-care debate failed to produce a comprehensive bill. But much of the wrangling involved just what form a state-run plan should take. Differences were resolved by creating a “citizens’ work group” on health care to tour the state in 2009 soliciting support for legislative action. The “citizens” will look at alternatives that include a Canadian-style single-payer plan, a state-run insurance exchange like one piloted in Massachusetts, and a possible comprehensive benefit package for all residents. It’s heavy on top-down stuff. Meanwhile, lawmakers enhanced the regulatory clout of the insurance commissioner and expanded a government-run insurance program for small businesses.

Efforts to combat climate change — possibly the only change people don’t want to see this year — continued in 2008. Last year, the governor issued an executive order establishing goals for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Legislators took those goals and made law around them. By 2020, greenhouse gas emissions must be reduced to 1990 levels, with additional reductions mandated into the future. Legislation also took it on itself to limit car and truck use by setting goals for reductions in “vehicle miles traveled.”

Compared with universal health care and saving the planet, requiring employers to provide some paid time off for parents to spend time with newborn or newly-adopted children sounds downright pedestrian. Even so, the Legislature still doesn’t know how to pay for it. Once launched, the leave program will doubtless expand. Such is the legislative compulsion to advance social policy by dictating workplace conditions.

And then there’s the unprecedented spending growth, fueled by a strong but now cooling economy. Already, nonpartisan fiscal staff members predict a $2.4 billion shortfall in the next budget cycle. The deficit was foreseeable and foreseen, but lawmakers, flush with cash and enthusiasm, plunged ahead.

Senate Republicans promote what they call the “punt list” of items Democrats kicked into 2009. The budget tops the list, which also includes family leave funding, property tax relief and health-care reform.

True, the majority left a lot undone, but they placed significant markers on the road to a greatly enlarged role for state government. Rather than kicking the ball away, the majority lit long fuses, strategically staggering the policy rollout — nothing too shocking at one time. But there’s no mistaking the agenda or their commitment to see it completed.

In November, Washington voters will again face the classic choice: “change versus more of the same.” Rarely have the contrasts been so sharply defined or the consequences so great.

Richard S. Davis, vice president-communications of the Association of Washington Business, writes every other Wednesday. His columns do not necessarily reflect the views of AWB. His e-mail address is richardsdavis@gmail.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, May 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A visitor takes in the view of Twin Lakes from a second floor unit at Housing Hope’s Twin Lakes Landing II Wednesday, Feb. 22, 2023, in Marysville, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Housing Hope’s ‘Stone Soup’ recipe for community

With homelessness growing among seniors, an advocate calls for support of the nonprofit’s projects.

Douthat: What guides Trump policy is a doctorine of the deal

Hawk or dove, former friend or foe; what matters most is driving a bargain, for good or ill.

Friedman: The uncertainties facing Biden and the world order

Biden, facing infirmities of mind and body, still understands the mission of America in the world.

Comment: GOP’s tax cut bill is ill-timed for economic moment

If a recession does hit, it’s the lower- and middle-income who can spend the economy’s way out; not the rich.

Comment: AmeriCorps staffers were making America healthy again

A modest stipend for students was providing experience and value. Until the Trump administration fired them.

Comment: When should judges have power to tell a president no?

Birthright citizenship is clearly law. What was up for debate is the fate of nationwide injunctions.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, May 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Cuts to Medicaid will make fentanyl fight harder

Medicaid’s expansion is helping many get the addiction treatment they need, reversing the crisis.

Comment: PBS, NPR need funding, and a good shake-up

PBS’s best dramas come from British TV. It needs to produce its own money-makers like ‘Downton Abbey.’

Saunders: Why did Tapper wait until now to admit Biden’s decline?

It was clear to voters long before Biden dropped out. Yet, now the CNN host has a book to sell.

Wildfire smoke builds over Darrington on Friday, Sept. 11, 2020 in Darrington, Wa. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Loss of research funds threat to climate resilience

The Trump administration’s end of a grant for climate research threatens solutions communities need.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.