Study should answer final streetcar questions

Following a brief stare-down with Mayor Ray Stephanson, the Everett City Council tonight is expected to approve up to $30,000 to study the financial implications and potential economic development benefits of a multi-million-dollar streetcar line through downtown Everett. It will do so without the mayor’s objection.

We see this as a reasonable complement to the $112,700 streetcar feasibility study released in December, which plotted possible streetcar alignments between downtown, Everett Community College, and future harborfront and riverfront developments. That study projected the cost of such a fixed route at $127 million to $132 million (in 2006 dollars), with annual operating and maintenance costs of $4.5 million. No small sums.

That study, however, didn’t look in depth at how a streetcar line would be paid for, or at the potential economic benefits. And it’s economic development, not improved transportation, that streetcars are primarily designed to deliver. If it was just about moving people, buses would seem much more cost-effective, and certainly more flexible. And negative perceptions of buses are fading as gas prices rise.

The aim is to have a mode of local transit that people will get exicited about (read “something cooler than buses”), thus driving massive commercial investment along its route. Some downtown business owners are worried that once condos, restaurants and retail outlets open on the riverfront and harborfront, economic activity will be drawn away from downtown.

After last year’s feasibility study by a San Francisco consultant, Stephanson opposed going further, saying the city had enough priorities competing for funding without adding another, especially one this expensive. Needs throughout the city — parks, better streets and sidewalks, new bike paths — were more pressing, he argued. Council members wanted to learn more before giving up on the streetcar idea.

The $30,000 limit that the council is expected to approve for Seattle’s Berk &Associates to identify the long-term financial implications of a streetcar line is reasonable, given what’s already been invested. Stephanson is right to go along, although he emphasizes that any further steps will depend on what this study finds.

If federal grants and assessments on downtown property owners who would see their property values rise will foot the bulk of the bill, great. If money has to be diverted from other city priorities, or if it requires raising sales taxes, it will be a tough sell.

Should Everett build a five-mile streetcar line? This $30,000 should get us close to a reasonable answer.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, May 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Sarah Weiser / The Herald
Air Force One touches ground Friday morning at Boeing in Everett.
PHOTO SHOT 02172012
Editorial: There’s no free lunch and no free Air Force One

Qatar’s offer of a 747 to President Trump solves nothing and leaves the nation beholden.

Schwab: Taken for a ride by the high plane grifter

A 747 from Qatari royals. Cyrpto-kleptocracy. And trade ‘deals’ that shift with Trump’s whims.

Saunders: Saudi visit puts Trump’s foreign policy on display

Like it or not, embracing the Saudis and who they are makes more sense than driving them elsewhere.

Harrop: Democrats’ battles over age ignore age of electorate

Party leaders should be careful with criticisms over age; they still have to appeal to older voters.

Comment: A bumpy travel season for U.S. tourists, destinations

Even with a pause in some tariffs, uncertainty is driving decisions on travel in and out of the U.S.

Comment: Trump’s break with Netanyahu just keeps widening

His trip to the Middle East, without a stop in Israel, is the latest example Trump has moved on.

The Washington State Legislature convenes for a joint session for a swearing-in ceremony of statewide elected officials and Governor Bob Ferguson’s inaugural address, March 15, 2025.
Editorial: 4 bills that need a second look by state lawmakers

Even good ideas, such as these four bills, can fail to gain traction in the state Legislature.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: What state lawmakers acheived this session

A look at some of the more consequential policy bills adopted by the Legislature in its 105 days.

Liz Skinner, right, and Emma Titterness, both from Domestic Violence Services of Snohomish County, speak with a man near the Silver Lake Safeway while conducting a point-in-time count Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024, in Everett, Washington. The man, who had slept at that location the previous night, was provided some food and a warming kit after participating in the PIT survey. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: County had no choice but to sue over new grant rules

New Trump administration conditions for homelessness grants could place county in legal jeopardy.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, May 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Governor should veto change to mortgage interest deduction

A provision in state tax legislation would increase mortgage costs for families buying homes.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.