Survey says: school leaders need tools to make changes

  • William Raspberry / Washington Post columnist
  • Monday, December 3, 2001 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — It is not money that is the key to transforming America’s troubled schools. The key is school leadership — principals and superintendents.

Before you dismiss this analysis as something you already knew, let me tell you where it came from: a survey of principals and superintendents, many of whom are running troubled schools and school districts.

So are these educators saying it’s their fault that their schools aren’t working very well? Not quite. They know what to do, they insist, and they’re chomping at the bit to get it done. But politics and bureaucracy get in the way.

The survey, the latest in a series undertaken by Public Agenda, a New York-based research organization, found school leaders virtually bubbling with confidence that they know how to improve public education — if only they were left alone to do it.

And what stands in their way? Interference from parents and "downtown," in the case of principals, and from politicians, in the case of superintendents. Non-academic requirements eat up their time, and unfunded mandates eat up their budgets. They can’t reward excellent teachers or dump ineffectual ones. They’re saddled with demands to raise test scores but left without the autonomy they need to make it happen.

The job, according to one of the 853 randomly selected principals and 909 superintendents who took part in the survey, is close to overwhelming. "My desk is never clear of obligations. … Constant interruptions from parents, teachers. … Principals do not have a lunch hour."

"In many ways, superintendents and principals seem to be chafing at the bit," said Deborah Wadsworth, Public Agenda president. "They are convinced that strong leadership can transform schools — and they are especially eager for more power to reward good teachers and remove poor ones — but politics and bureaucracy just eat away at them."

I don’t doubt it. It’s hard to win when you can’t reward your best players or bench (or trade) those who either can’t or won’t perform. It’s hard to focus on your key task when those above you are saddling you with duties that have more to do with satisfying bureaucratic imperatives than on doing your job. One earmark of successful principals is their ability to manipulate or ignore "downtown" — either because they are clever or because they have "godfathers," inside or outside the system, who can cut them some slack. Indeed, the relative freedom from bureaucratic interference is one of the main reasons for the growth of the charter school movement.

But there’s another side to that coin. Autonomy can empower bad principals as well as good. It can free up the autocrats to run roughshod over staff or to take care of friends or to punish those they view as threats. Only a third of the superintendents in the Public Agenda survey said they are happy with the competency of their principals when it comes to recruiting talented staff, making tough decisions, delegating responsibility or using money effectively.

I don’t know if these judgments are fair or not, but I’ve learned to be a bit skeptical of cops who would be solving crimes left and right were it not for the idiots in the white shirts, of reporters who’d be winning Pulitzers but for the cretins at the editors’ desks, and of principals who would be turning out National Merit Scholars by the score if they could get free of "downtown." Giving autononomy to incompetents could be like using Miracle-Gro on kudzu.

One of my problems with this new survey is that it tells me nothing about what these school leaders would actually do if they were given a free hand. This may be more the fault of the surveyors than of the respondents, but to my mind it is essential. I can’t tell you the number of principals and superintendents I talk to who seem to have no idea of how to improve learning (or test scores) in their schools, beyond the cliches of bigger budgets and smaller class sizes. Many seem not to have thought seriously about the issue — perhaps because so many principals and superintendents are hired to fix systems (by improving discipline, straightening out payroll or any of a hundred other things) than to educate children.

Still the respondents have a point: Responsibility without resources and authority is a recipe for failure. Which might make you wonder why nearly three-quarters of the superintendents and two-thirds of the principals said they’d choose the same line of work if they were just starting out.

Sorta reminds you of Samuel Johnson’s characterization of second marriages as "the triumph of hope over experience."

William Raspberry can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200 or willrasp@washpost.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Comment: Trump can go only as far as the courts will allow

Most of Trump’s executive orders are likely to face court challenges, setting the limits of presidential power.

Comment: Civil service needs reform; Trump means only to gut it

It’s too difficult to hire and fire federal workers. A grand bargain is possible, but that’s not what Trump seeks.

Saunders: U.S. Iron Dome isn’t feasible now, but it could be

Trump is correct to order a plan for a system that would protect the nation from missile strikes.

Harrop: Trump has no sense of damage from tariff threats

Even if ultimately averted, a trade war with Canada and Mexico could drive both from U.S. exports.

A young man carries water past the destroyed buildings of a neighborhood in the Gaza Strip, Feb. 2, 2025. President Donald Trump’s proposal to “own” the Gaza Strip and transfer its population elsewhere has stirred condemnation and sarcasm, but it addresses a real and serious challenge: the future of Gaza as a secure, peaceful, even prosperous place. (Saher Alghorra/The New York Times)
Comment: ‘Homeland’ means exactly that to Gazans

Palestinians have long resisted resettlement. Trump’s plan to ‘clean out’ Gaza changes nothing.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

A press operator grabs a Herald newspaper to check over as the papers roll off the press in March 2022 in Everett. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Push back news desert with journalism support

A bill in the state Senate would tax big tech to support a hiring fund for local news outlets.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Rent stabilization can keep more from losing homes

Thank you to The Herald Editorial Board for its editorial, regarding rent… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.