Tax deductions might make reparations work

  • William Raspberry / Washington Post columnist
  • Monday, May 27, 2002 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — I’ve just tossed away another losing lottery ticket. This one would have fetched the tidy pretax annuitized sum of $80 million. When the jackpot builds up once more, I’ll probably try it again.

I’m trying to make it clear, before I start to talk about reparations for slavery, that I’m not above developing an interest in money I didn’t earn. If the group headed by Charles Ogletree, the Harvard law professor, can get me a few mil as compensation for the fact that my great-grandparents (and many generations of their ancestors) made unrequited contributions to the development of the country, I’ll take it.

So why have I hesitated to become a full-fledged advocate of reparations? In part, I suppose, because I have no way of figuring out — even of thinking about—what the American people owe me for my grandparents’ unpaid labor. Or my parents’ undercompensated labor. Or the jobs I couldn’t get, or the income I was denied based in large measure on race.

The whole reparations idea starts to sound like an appeal to national guilt, but an appeal that requires me to assume the victim’s role.

That’s one hand. Here’s the other: There are problems that black Americans suffer that have their deep roots in slavery and racism. It doesn’t seem reasonable that the thing to do about this legacy is … nothing.

Which is why I’m glad I ran into James P. Comer the other day. The Yale University professor of psychiatry and extraordinarily successful public school reformer was at North Carolina State University, where the two of us were among the school’s commencement honorees, when I broached the subject of reparations.

It’s something he’s thought about. Listen:

"My feeling is that we need an approach that is fair to everybody — that allows the larger society to get off its unproductive guilt-and-defense response and that allows African Americans not to feel victimized, while at the same time making it possible to address the problem that was created by the conditions of slavery.

"The problem manifests itself in underachievement and underpreparation in all the things that require high levels of development, and overrepresentation in such things as criminal activity and dependency. This is largely the aftermath of slavery, the failure of African Americans to have access to the same political and economic situation as everybody else when everybody else had it."

And what would he do about it now? He would enact legislation to allow black taxpayers to direct up to 95 percent of their federal income taxes directly to a series of foundations set up specifically to help those blacks who have been most hurt by slavery and its legacy. These black-run foundations would have two main focuses: educating young people for work, family life and citizenship, and promoting economic development and economic access for the rest of us.

Here, as they used to say, is the beauty part. The proposal wouldn’t take any money out of the economy, but merely redirect it as you might designate all or most of your United Way contribution to the Girl Scouts. And, says Comer, "it would be in the interest of all of America. It’s important to the health of the entire society not to have another generation of non-mainstream and nonproductive — even counterproductive — African Americans. It simply costs too much, economically, socially and civically."

One problem with his proposal would involve choosing which foundations and which leaders would become custodians of black America’s redirected taxes. Comer says it is the sort of problem private foundations have to deal with all the time. "We’d have to have the same sort of process — very careful selection of directors and officers, a careful development of a set of criteria based on the understanding that the purpose is to bring our people into the mainstream of society. It would be important to pick people who have a track record for solid work in this area — perhaps people who head similar organizations right now."

There might also be the logistical problem of determining which taxpayers would qualify to have their income taxes diverted. Perhaps the way around that would be to make the entire matter voluntary and nonracial from the taxpayers’ viewpoint. That is, any taxpayer could designate up to 95 percent of his taxes for the foundations. Presumably virtually all African Americans would so designate, but a great many others might as well.

Comer may not have a perfect proposal, but I’d sure love to hear it discussed.

William Raspberry can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200 or willrasp@washpost.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Comment: Trump can go only as far as the courts will allow

Most of Trump’s executive orders are likely to face court challenges, setting the limits of presidential power.

Comment: Civil service needs reform; Trump means only to gut it

It’s too difficult to hire and fire federal workers. A grand bargain is possible, but that’s not what Trump seeks.

Saunders: U.S. Iron Dome isn’t feasible now, but it could be

Trump is correct to order a plan for a system that would protect the nation from missile strikes.

Harrop: Trump has no sense of damage from tariff threats

Even if ultimately averted, a trade war with Canada and Mexico could drive both from U.S. exports.

A young man carries water past the destroyed buildings of a neighborhood in the Gaza Strip, Feb. 2, 2025. President Donald Trump’s proposal to “own” the Gaza Strip and transfer its population elsewhere has stirred condemnation and sarcasm, but it addresses a real and serious challenge: the future of Gaza as a secure, peaceful, even prosperous place. (Saher Alghorra/The New York Times)
Comment: ‘Homeland’ means exactly that to Gazans

Palestinians have long resisted resettlement. Trump’s plan to ‘clean out’ Gaza changes nothing.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Rent stabilization can keep more from losing homes

Thank you to The Herald Editorial Board for its editorial, regarding rent… Continue reading

Don’t pamper young criminals with lenient sentences

I want to give a shout out to Todd Welch for his… Continue reading

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.