This election matters; don’t sit it out

This state has never really taken to politics as a contact sport. While the pros play hard, the stands rarely fill. The fans show up for the big games — a presidential contest or hotly contested gubernatorial race — but otherwise stay home.

Maybe it’s the temperate climate, the legacy of Scandinavian diffidence or the abundance of competing diversions, but our culture does not cultivate a pervasive political passion.

People pay attention when they believe the investment of time and effort will pay off for them. When things are going well, the average voter can afford to leave politics to others.

In 2004, Ilya Somin, an assistant professor at George Mason School of Law, explained such “rational ignorance” this way: “The rational voter has little incentive to gain more knowledge about politics because his or her vote is unlikely to affect the outcome. Since gaining more knowledge offers few benefits and substantial costs, the average citizen remains ignorant, though rationally so.”

Things are not going well, now, however. Moreover, what may make sense for the individual poses a significant risk to the democracy. Last February, in a Forbes magazine commentary, Somin wrote, “The best response to voter ignorance is to reduce the size and scope of government.”

The larger and more complex the government, the more estranged and powerless its citizens become. It will be the work of a lifetime to recapture territory ceded to the federal government in recent years. The mounting deficit and governance problems in California, New York, and other big government states underscore the dangers of expanding entitlements, burgeoning bureaucracies, and runaway regulators.

That’s why this year Washington voters have good reason to engage directly and vigorously in the 2010 election. There’s a great deal at stake. Each vote matters.

Already, 16 incumbents have said they would be leaving their current seats. According to Washington State Wire, 10 of them are leaving for good and six to run for another office. That’s unusually high turnover. It may get higher as the June filing date approaches. While health, ambition and fatigue played a role in individual decisions, who can doubt that politics has lost some of its appeal in these days of tight budgets and tense temperaments?

Open seats offer opportunity for newcomers. Moreover, national polling points to uncommon incumbent vulnerability among those running for re-election.

With Democrats holding overwhelming majorities, they have the most at risk. Nationally, political analyst Charlie Cook writes, “… the passion for voting is almost all Republican.” Our state is not the exception.

Consider it a passion for job creation and a growing economy.

With unemployment expected to remain high through the fall, the economy will again be the dominant issue in the coming campaigns. A projected budget shortfall of more than $2 billion raises the prospects of another tax-and-cut legislative session.

A recent analysis by Democracy Corps, a consulting firm founded by Clinton alumni James Carville and Stanley Greenberg, lays out the majority party’s problem: “Democrats have yet to credibly reassure voters on spending and deficits. At the moment, voters believe cutting taxes and spending and reducing government will be better for the economy than investing to create jobs.”

That’s not an easy position for Democrats to take in Olympia, though some did. Organized labor has drawn a line in the sand. Last month, Washington Federation of State Employees, angered by budget reductions and “attacks” on state worker salaries and benefits, endorsed just one state senator and 18 representatives. For organized labor, “rational ignorance” has never been an option. Public employees have a direct stake in increasing the size and scope of government and protecting their Cadillac compensation packages. That sets up the likelihood of union-backed challengers to more centrist Democratic incumbents.

With the “top two” primary, we now can see competitive general election contests in districts dominated by a single party. So wherever you vote, you’ll have choices. Choose the candidates that will work to restructure and streamline state government, stimulate private sector job creation, and bring spending under control. Get to know them. Volunteer in their campaigns. Write them a check. Start now.

Ignorance isn’t rational this year. It just guarantees more of the unsustainable status quo.

Richard S. Davis, president of the Washington Research Council, writes on public policy, economics and politics. His e-mail address is richardsdavis@gmail.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

**EMBARGO: No electronic distribution, Web posting or street sales before Saturday at 3:00 a.m. ET on Mar. 1, 2025. No exceptions for any reasons. EMBARGO set by source.** House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, (D-NY) speaks at a news conference about Republicans’ potential budget cuts to Medicaid, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Feb. 27, 2025. As Republicans push a budget resolution through Congress that will almost certainly require Medicaid cuts to finance a huge tax reduction, Democrats see an opening to use the same strategy in 2026 that won them back the House in 2018. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Editorial: Don’t gut Medicaid for richest Americans’ tax cuts

Extending tax cuts, as promised by Republicans, would likely force damaging cuts to Medicaid.

Comment: Learning costs of ignoring environment the hard way

EPA chief Lee Zeldin can’t flip a switch on protections, but we’ll lose precious momentum on climate.

Comment: What promise to ‘review the data’ could mean for health

Noncommittal responses from the FDA nominee show a willingness to follow Trump’s whims, not science.

Collins: How well have you followed Trump 2.0’s initial days?

Honestly, if you get a perfect score, why have you not already applied for Canadian citizenship?

Polgreen: ‘A kind of vandalism’ threatens the First Amendment

There’s a message in the arrest of a legal resident who protested for Gaza: you have no right to speak.

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, March 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — Smog in the Manhattan borough of New York on Thanksgiving Day, Nov. 24, 1966. A century ago, a well-ventilated building could be a bulwark against disease, but with the arrival of COVID-19, when buildings could barely breathe, Americans gained a renewed appreciation for the health benefits of clean air. (Neal Boenzi/The New York Times)
Comment: What a loss of clean air rules could cost us

For more than 50 years, the rules have been a benefit to the economy as much as Americans’ health.

Cmobine state retirement systems to save $600M

Sen. June Robinson’s Senate Bill 5085 passed the Senate Floor on March… Continue reading

End of foreign aid will hurt U.S. reputation

In the spring of 2004, as reports of cruelty and torture of… Continue reading

Zelensky fighting for democracy; who does Trump support?

Recently our country watched a disgusting display of “diplomacy” from our nation’s… Continue reading

Comment: County must balance needs for housing and habitat

A proposed policy for the county’s critical areas rules sticks with standards that are working well.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.