Treaty must change will changing times

The article featured in The Herald regarding the Tulalips’ newly acquired hunting lands under the Treaty of Point Elliot (1855), brings about many concerns. Beyond simple hunting rights, of which I completely disagree unless exercised using 1855 technology, we must begin to ask ourselves difficult questions regarding assimilation. At what point do we dissolve a treaty written over 150 years ago and begin to take into account the changes in our environment, technology and society? In 1855, the thought of managing salmon harvests, tree harvests and big game harvests were simply unimaginable. Yet, the Tulalips stand firm upon their tribal rights, despite how impractical, illogical or unsustainable they are.

The cliche of having cake and eating it too holds true within these circumstances. Native Americans, like all members of our society, have participated in activities that have brought the degradation of our natural environment. Yet, by the powers granted in an outdated treaty, the Tulalips obtain reprieve from the efforts to manage the resources. For Native Americans, a very sweet gig indeed; money for nothing, free access to infrastructure and absolution from the rules that govern others. To stand firm in the treaty of 1855 is to affirm the existing belief system at that time. Surely, my ancestors participated in activities considered immoral by a standard given today. What, then, constitutes a birthright?

Clayton A. Smith

Edmonds