Trick or treat? Thoughts of Bush’s Court are scary

  • William Raspberry / Washington Post columnist
  • Thursday, October 26, 2000 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — We’ve all got our scary Halloween monsters. Here’s mine: A U.S. Supreme Court with five justices whose politics, reasoning and opinions echo those of Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.

Unfortunately, my monster has a very good chance of becoming real. Indeed Texas Gov. George W. Bush has promised to make it real. Not only has he been using that hair-raising phrase "strict constructionist" to describe the kind of people he would appoint to the federal courts, he’s actually said Scalia and Thomas are his prototypes.

And what’s so scary about that? Nothing — unless you happen to recall a previous invocation of strict constructionism during the Nixon era, when that phrase was taken (by some of us, at least) to signal a pulling back from such things as desegregation.

It may have been touted as a philosophical desire to have judges quit their "judicial activism" and defer to the "original intent" of the framers of the Constitution, but it was, many of us were certain, really a desire to produce a certain kind of social and political result.

It was rather like another Nixon-era phrase, "law and order." It wasn’t the denotation but the connotation that raised our hackles. No matter what the Nixon folk said, what we heard was an intention to crack down on the inner cities and tame the more militant black activists.

But that was a generation ago. Isn’t there ample evidence that, whatever his shortcomings, Bush is no racial demagogue? Hasn’t time drained the old catchwords of their more sinister meaning?

Well, yes. I don’t think Bush’s intentions are at all racially malign. My best guess is that he uses the phrase "strict constructionist" to signal to the religious right, and particularly to the single-issue opponents of abortion, that he will name justices who are likely to be sympathetic to revisiting Roe vs. Wade.

I’m guessing as well that overturning that abortion ruling is not a particularly important matter to Bush personally. What is more probable is that this is a sop he would toss to his party’s right-wing true believers in appreciation for their not making a huge anti-abortion ruckus at the GOP convention.

The problem, though, is that judges who believe the Supreme Court overstepped its bounds in Roe vs. Wade are likely to believe that it similarly overstepped in finding in the Constitution a right to privacy or a prohibition against segregated public facilities or the authority to provide special catch-up help for racial minorities.

It may not be an ironclad rule, but isn’t it a fact that strict constructionists tend also to be political conservatives?

Even the prospect of a conservative season on the Supreme Court wouldn’t bother me all that much if that season was coterminous with a prospective Bush administration. If the whole enterprise should turn out to be a blunder, why we could undo it in four years, or eight.

But federal judges, including those who sit on the Supreme Court, serve for life, and you only have to look at the present court to see that that can be a very long time. Chief Justice William Rehnquist is 76. Justice John Paul Stevens is 80. Sandra Day O’Connor is 70. Ruth Bader Ginsberg is 67. If Justice Thomas, 52, serves until he is Stevens’ age, he will be on the court another 28 years!

If you really want to frighten me, suggest the possibility that a President Bush could fill three or four vacancies with "strict constructionists" in their 40s.

I grant the likelihood that political conservatives are as frightened by the prospect of having three or four justices — and any number of federal judges — appointed by a President Al Gore. Naturally I think my own fear is better founded — in part because I don’t think a successful Gore would owe the same sort of debt to the Democratic left that a successful Bush would owe to the Republican right and would therefore seek judges nearer the center.

But maybe I’m simply refusing to consider the matter from any viewpoint but my own. That, for me, is an unnerving thought — Halloween or not.

Or could it be that, by getting myself worked up over what a Bush court would be like, I’m letting myself become one of those political monsters that scare me so much — a single-issue voter?

Now that’s frightening.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, May 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - A worker cleans a jet bridge at Paine Field in Everett, Wash., before passengers board an Alaska Airlines flight, March 4, 2019. Seattle-based Alaska Airlines owns Horizon Air. Three passengers sued Alaska Airlines on Thursday, Nov. 2, 2023, saying they suffered emotional distress from an incident last month in which an off-duty pilot, was accused of trying to shut down the engines of a flight from Washington state to San Francisco. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: FAA bill set to improve flight safety, experience

With FAA reauthorization, Congress proves it’s capable of legislating and not just throwing shade.

The author’s 19-year-old niece, Veronika, was among seven people killed by a gunman on May 23, 2014, in Isla Vista, Calif.
Comment: I lost my niece to gun violence 10 years ago this week

Since then, Washington state voters and lawmakers have taken bold steps to discourage gun violence.

Comment: Reroute of Harvey Field runway not worth flood risk

Without a projected need for expansion, the work risks flooding impacts to wildlife and residents.

Expanding grants will help more students get college degrees

For good or ill, the American labor force is being automated. To… Continue reading

Was I-5’s long closure necessary?

It seems there needs to be a rational discussion and possibly a… Continue reading

Balloon releases are harming wildlife

When will the media stop perpetuating the myth that releasing balloons into… Continue reading

1oth LD, Senate race: St. Clair brings experience to post

We are fortunate to have an outstanding Democratic candidate running for State… Continue reading

FILE — TikTok content creators at a news conference with several House Democrats on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, March 12, 2024. A bill that would force a sale of TikTok by its Chinese owner, ByteDance — or ban it outright — was passed by the Senate and is expected to be signed into law by President Biden; now the process is likely to get even more complicated. (Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Comment: Why TikTok’s lawsuit of federal ban isn’t all talk

The social media app’s makers are challenging the ban on legitimate First Amendment grounds.

The vessel Tonga Chief, a 10-year-old Singaporean container ship, is moored at the Port of Everett Seaport in November, 2023, in Everett. (Ryan Berry / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Leave port tax issue for campaign, not the ballot

Including “taxing district” on ballot issue to expand the Port of Everett’s boundaries is prejudicial.

Snohomish County Councilmembers Nate Nehring, left, and Jared Mead, speaking, take turns moderating a panel including Tulip Tribes Chairwoman Teri Gobin, Stanwood Mayor Sid Roberts and Lynnwood Mayor Christine Frizzell during the Building Bridges Summit on Monday, Dec. 4, 2023, at Western Washington University Everett in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Candidates, voters have campaign promises to make

Two county officials’ efforts to improve political discourse skills are expanding to youths and adults.

Attorney General Bob Ferguson speaks to a reporter as his 2024 gubernatorial campaign launch event gets underway in Seattle, on Saturday, Sept. 9, 2023. ( Jerry Cornfield/Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Recruiting two Bob Fergusons isn’t election integrity

A GOP activist paid the filing fee for two gubernatorial candidates who share the attorney general’s name.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.