U.S. cannot fight what it does not understand

  • Geneva Overholser / Washington Post columnist
  • Saturday, September 22, 2001 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — "You cannot fight what you can’t understand," my neighbor is telling me, and I think he is right, although some of what he is saying is very hard for an American to hear, particularly at this moment, barely a week since our world was altered.

My neighbor is French by birth, a virtual American by acculturation — having spent most of 40 years here — and also an Africanist, intimately tied to the developing world. His perch, then, is a cultural three-legged stool, and his empathy is distributed accordingly.

He is hoping, says Xavier de la Renaudiere, that the tragedy of September 11 could cause the United States to ponder how we might eliminate some of the grievances the world nurses against us. To do so, he says, "would take deliberate action on the part of the U.S. to review its whole attitude."

Reviewing our attitude is hardly what America seems inclined to do, but I continue listening. We must try, he says, to understand what fuels the grudges against the West. Partly, it’s opposition to modernity. When centuries-old social systems are catapulted forward without benefit of generations of evolution, there is shock.

Then of course there is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which breeds support for terrorism in the Muslim world. Finally, there is the feeling among many around the globe that America is arrogant and unready to recognize the legitimacy of other views and other aspirations.

What might we do about all this? To quell the fears of modernization, he suggests, we must "eliminate the desire to convert everyone. You are what you are, they are what they are, have respect for their customs." A second need, of course — so urgent yet so difficult to achieve — is resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

And then there’s the arrogance. We must tone down our rhetoric, quit proclaiming our power and virtues, and let our deeds — and our friends — speak for us. "Bill Gates doesn’t say all the time that he’s the richest guy in the world. The others can say that."

In a way, Xavier notes, what happened September 11 represents not a political change, but a technological one. Anti-American sentiments — anti-Western sentiments — have been around. But now we see them operating on a different scale. "No longer is this something that could kill a few people in a ship somewhere, but something that could go to the heart of a society."

The only hope against such terror, he says, lies in a coalition — not simply of governments, but "a coalition among people." This is not a coalition set up essentially as a cover for our pursuit of our own goals, nor a coalition only of close allies. "You need much more this time. It is essential that some of the nations in the Middle East be with you. You need sources of information there. You need the people with you. It’s the people who will find the terrorists."

And how might this come about? "You can achieve much more if the U.S. is prepared to show a different face: A country that is not simply the arrogant superpower, but a country that is in tune with world public opinion."

Again I am struck that world opinion may not be uppermost in our minds at the moment — though I recall a powerful American antecedent for having it be so, in times of crisis: Our forefathers, in the Declaration of Independence, proclaiming themselves mindful of what "a decent respect to the opinions of mankind" required of them.

However, even as I am moved by what Xavier is telling me, I am aware that a very different course is likely. What does he think will happen, I ask, if we now attempt to get rid of Osama bin Laden? "Killing bin Laden will galvanize the others," says Xavier. "Successors will rise up. Not with the same resources, perhaps. But once he has found the technology, others will find it, too — or worse. Whatever you do to protect yourself, they will always find a weakness through which to go after you, eventually."

I think of Russia’s "bleeding wound," as Mikhail Gorbachev characterized his country’s tragic efforts in Afghanistan. I think of what our open society and respect for civil liberties mean to us, and of all that now threatens them. I think of the fears of the terrorist acts still to come. And I think that, by contrast, what my neighbor is saying feels hopeful.

"You cannot fight what you cannot understand," he says again. "At least we should know it. There is a difference between understanding and approving." And I think that he is right.

Geneva Overholser can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200 or overholserg@washpost.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Feb. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

Welch: State Democrats’ bill would undermine parental rights

The bill would allow kids as young as 13 to make mental health decisions without notice to parents.

Kristof: Child malnutrition lost in politics over aid cuts

A young journalist describes the scene in Madagascar where a nutritious porridge provides a lifeline.

Comment: Trump sticks with NOAA official who bent to his ego

We haven’t seen the last of Trump’s Sharpie-amended reality and it’s destabilizing effect on scientists.

Dowd: Musk’s ‘Lost Boys’ join Trump’s ‘Mean Girls’ ethic to gut it all

Neither man shows any concern for the damage they threaten against individuals here and abroad.

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Sentencing reforms more complicated than column described

I read Todd Welch’s Jan. 29 column. He is certainly entitled to… Continue reading

President Trump running nation like his failed businesses

We’ve seen it before; President Trump will do or say anything to… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.