U.S. terror policy fans Pakistan-India flames

  • Jim Hoagland / Washington Post columnist
  • Saturday, August 17, 2002 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — Pushed back from impending military conflict in June by forceful U.S. diplomatic intervention, India and Pakistan have resumed their deadly minuet of threat and counterthreat. Iraq is not the only locale that war threatens to visit and devastate this winter.

On present trends the end of 2002 will be a season of widespread conflict: American troops will still be in Afghanistan hunting al Qaeda; Israelis and Palestinians locked in a seemingly unbreakable cycle of terror and retaliation may fight on; the U.S. campaign for regime change in Iraq will be approaching its military go-or-no-go point. You can now add to that bleak picture the news that President Pervez Musharraf is moving Pakistan back to the brink with India to secure his increasingly shaky grip on power at home.

Each of these conflicts runs on its own dynamic. But they all are now linked by President Bush’s war on global terrorism. They are moving parts that Bush and his aides must manage individually in ways that do not undermine the president’s larger war goals.

Musharraf brought the threat of war in South Asia back into focus last week by delivering a saber-rattling speech on Pakistan’s Aug. 14 celebration of its 55th year of independence.

But it is not only the Pakistani military ruler’s rhetoric that points toward a new crisis in the making. Discussions with influential Indian opinion-makers and analysts at an Aspen Strategy Group meeting in Colorado this month suggest that the attitude of India’s political and military leaders has changed since June on two points that make war more likely.

First, India’s leaders are letting it be known in New Delhi that they cannot afford to back down in the face of Pakistan’s open threats to use nuclear weapons to counter India’s overwhelming conventional superiority. India was, in their view at least, the victim of history’s biggest nuclear bluff last spring. To let Musharraf continue to practice brinksmanship and nuclear deterrence would paralyze Indian strategy and discredit these leaders with their own electorate.

Second, U.S. diplomatic intervention is now a devalued tool in Indian eyes. The promise that Musharraf made to Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage in June to end cross-border terrorism in India and Kashmir "permanently" has not been carried out by anyone’s measure, and the United States has not forcefully pressed Musharraf to keep his word.

There has in fact been no meaningful effort to close down the 50 to 60 known terrorist training camps located in Pakistan and Pakistani-controlled Kashmir. The infiltration supported by Pakistani army units across Kashmir’s line of control has begun to rise toward normal levels again after a dip. When Secretary of State Colin Powell, on his recent trip to New Delhi, ducked a question by saying that infiltration was difficult to measure, Indian officials reacted bitterly to the blatant evasion.

"Powell’s visits have become a diminishing asset," said one Indian with access to official thinking. The government may make that point through protocol as well. Armitage is due in New Delhi late this week as part of an Asian tour. But meetings with senior officials he has seen before may be difficult to arrange this time around, Indians say.

Powell’s deputy may also face tough going in Islamabad. Musharraf will no doubt complain (accurately) that India has not reduced its mobilized border force of 700,000 soldiers, despite the promise that Musharraf gave (insincerely) to Armitage in June to behave in Kashmir. Instead, India says the litmus test for defusing tensions must be the orderly conduct of statewide parliamentary elections scheduled in Indian-controlled Kashmir in September and October.

But Musharraf gave a decisive green light to the subversion of the elections by Kashmir terror groups with his independence day vow never to compromise on the disputed territory.

Musharraf has isolated himself at home on every other issue of importance. He has antagonized political parties by upending Pakistan’s constitution and its version of democracy in a personal power grab. He has antagonized fundamentalist Islamic forces by giving lip service to Bush’s war on terrorism. Now without any constituency of his own except the army, Musharraf cannot afford to appear weak on Kashmir.

U.S. policy-makers are scared stiff that Musharraf will be overthrown or assassinated and American access to bases used in fighting al Qaeda will be lost. But they overlook the greater risks for Bush’s war on terrorism and his presidency created by giving Musharraf a relatively free hand in Kashmir and a pass on cracking down on fundamentalism in Pakistan. That is pouring kerosene, not water, on an already blazing fire.

Jim Hoagland can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200 or hoaglandj@washpost.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Rivian, based in Irvine, Calif., has introduced its new R2 models, smaller and more affordable SUVs. (Rivian)
Editorial: Open electric vehicle market to direct sales

Legislation would allow EV makers to sell directly to customers, making lease or purchase easier.

Comment: No one saw Musk’s DOGE rampage coming or its threat

With no formal grant of authority, Musk is making cuts without fully understanding the consequences.

Douthat: Trump is chasing off lawyers he’ll need at some point

The deal to clear Adams serves Trump only as a way of identify whom he can consider loyal in the DOJ.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

President Donald Trump listens alongside Elon Musk as he explains the administration’s cost-cutting efforts in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, on Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025. Musk has for weeks posted on social media about government spending, often amplifying and seeding false information. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)
Comment: This crisis can’t be left to courts alone

The courts can uphold the law, but they can’t match the speed of the executive branch in tearing down systems.

Eco-nomics: Climate change is making insurance a risky bet

Keeping home insurance affordable amid climate change will take adaptation to threats and broader efforts.

The Buzz: When you gotta boogie, best to shake it off, kid

A pasquidadian review of the week’s news.

Stick with solutions to homelessness that have heart

A friend of mine, a poet from Leningrad who was born during… Continue reading

SAVE Act would restrict voting rights

As a mother, I am flabbergasted by the continued and increasing attacks… Continue reading

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: U.S. and Canada better neighbors than housemates

President Trump may be serious about annexing Canada, but it’s a deal fraught with complexities for all.

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.