UPS uses USPS, so should you

My ire is often aimed at the United States Postal Service (USPS), mostly around the times of mailing rate increases. I have no beef with the friendly and efficient clerks at the post office. Our dedicated mail carriers, of which I once was one, deliver the mail six days a week.

Any lingering “negative feelings” towards the USPS suddenly seems to have changed and I feel compelled to share my eye-opening experience.

I recently had the opportunity to “explore an alternative, more efficient” mailing service due to an unexpected urgency of getting a package of medication off to my wife, who was visiting our son in California.

Remembering “excellent service and speedy delivery,” I headed to UPS on the Mukilteo Speedway last Wednesday, feeling that the package could be tracked and arrive in California by Saturday. No such luck! On Monday my son said, “The ‘goods’ are here, but why didn’t you send it UPS?”

The package was actually sent USPS on Thursday from Lynnwood. I did not ask to send it overnight, but why the one-day delay and sending it USPS?

Why did UPS charge $8 and send it for $4.80 via USPS? It probably was not illegal, but seems unethical.

The UPS clerk explained it was cheaper to send it USPS — “everyone knows that is the regular UPS mark-up.” I told him I neither intended to return to his place of business nor use UPS services.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Ignorance of mailing charges can cost you close to 50 percent more.

The Mukilteo Post Office is half the distance from our home and I could have saved $3.20 in postage, not to mention the gas money.

Alf L. Knudsen

Mukilteo

Talk to us

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, March 24

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Cathlamet, the Washington State Ferry that crashed in Seattle last month, sits at the Port of Everett on Thursday, Aug. 25, 2022, in Everett, Washington. The ferry will require extensive repairs after a hard landing crumpled one corner of the boat at the Fauntleroy dock on July 28. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: State needs quicker route for its new ferries

‘Build in Washington’ can be scraped as a mandate, while still counting benefits of in-state shipyards.

Department of Natural Resources regional manager Allen McGuire, left, and acting bolder unit forester Tyson Whiteid, right, stand next to marker on land recently purchased by the DNR for timber harvest on Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2019 in Gold Bar, Wash. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Use state forestlands to ‘farm’ carbon credits

Legislation would allow the DNR to sell carbon offsets to fund reforestation and other climate work.

Getty Images, sundial
Editorial: Indifference risks loss of access to public records

Members of the state’s Sunshine Committee are questioning how much others value its work.

Schwab: Trump’s GOP defenders get busy in face of Stormy weather

While assuring no one is ‘under the law,’ Trump’s excuse team are already obfuscating and misdirecting.

Kids can pass along environmental lessons to adults

What a great article by Julie Titone reegarding climate change education! (“Amid… Continue reading

Make climate investments from carbon credit auction count

Washington’s landmark cap-and-invest program has begun to generate revenue through its first… Continue reading

Fox News is selling its viewers on a fantasy

Neither Stormy Daniels nor any of her colleagues in the sex industry… Continue reading

Comment: Arkansas makes it easier to hire kids at slaughterhouses

When teens as young as 13 were found cleaning meatpacking plants, Arkansas eased its child labor laws.

Most Read