Voting history haunts a candidate despite ‘no comment’

So unpopular is President Obama these days that the (D) following Democratic candidates’ names might stand for Denial.

And, so desperate are political pundits for any fresh news crumb that a molehill quickly becomes a mountain. One ill-chosen word — or, worse, failure to answer a reporter’s question — and the candidate is suddenly redrawn into a caricature he doesn’t recognize.

Just ask Mitt “47 percent” Romney or former Virginia Gov. George “macaca” Allen. Now add to the list Kentucky Democrat and U.S. Senate candidate Alison Lundergan Grimes, who, upon dodging a question about whether she voted for President Obama, is sitting atop a mountain of media pain.

A bright, attractive candidate any state would be proud to claim, Grimes staked her campaign on how much she isn’t like Barack Obama. Her ads have been so starkly separatist — “I’m not Barack Obama” — that she might as well have been wearing a hazmat suit.

Note to politicos: When your ad begins “I’m not … ,” you’re probably already in trouble. And, when you choose to distance yourself from your own party’s leader, people are going to wonder whether you ever supported him — and when you stopped.

Thus, when an editorial board asked Grimes whether she had voted for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012 (she was a Hillary Clinton delegate in 2008), Grimes tepidly mentioned “the sanctity of the ballot box,” and then tried to direct attention elsewhere.

Later, when asked the same question during a recent debate with incumbent Sen. Mitch McConnell, she elaborated on her principled position against such questioning, but her reply was too little too late. The unanswered question had seized the buzz and foretold the deluge.

The point she was trying to make is the only one that matters: How people vote is no one else’s business. This is foundational in a free, democratic society. Yet, voters will hear little else in the remaining weeks before Election Day than that Grimes wouldn’t come clean, followed by all the implicit questions and doubts about her honesty, forthrightness and, the only sin Americans won’t forgive, hypocrisy.

Oh, what tangled webs …

But of course Grimes voted for Barack Obama! (Or did she?)

By her refusal to answer, are we to infer that she voted for John McCain or Mitt Romney? Perhaps she didn’t vote at all. Lie avoidance seems a more plausible explanation than fear of revealing the obvious.

Besides, who agrees with everything a president does along party lines, anyway? A: Only people who have nothing interesting to say.

I admit to some ambivalence on the molehill that didn’t have to become a mountain. On the one hand, the question shouldn’t be asked. Or rather, it needn’t be answered. On the other hand, well, why not just answer the dadgum question?

Media reaction to her dodge at first seemed a function of narcissistic injury than virtuous pursuit of public interest. How dare she flout our right to know? In fairness, reporters (including yours truly) will always ask the (any) question on the well-grounded assumption that the victim, I mean respondent, will usually answer.

Even so, criticism of Grimes’ petite omission seems unduly harsh. Some analysts have all but called her campaign over.

On a personal note, I don’t even know how my husband votes — and he would never ask me for whom I voted. What is marriage without a little mystery?

Right or wrong, the unanswered question will linger if only because we are a little bored. The truth is, Grimes’ only substantive error was not being prepared for a question that, given her campaign ads, was all but inevitable.

Her attempt to focus attention on ballot sanctity suffered from a first mention that was weak and a second that seemed too studied for an exam that had already passed.

Too bad Grimes didn’t seize the opportunity and make memorable the moment when she chastised the media for forgetting the bloodshed by our forebears and, not long ago, our fellow African-American citizens, who suffered and died for the right to cast a ballot without fear of retribution.

Well, you don’t get a chance to take a principled stand every day.

This bitter episode — or teachable moment, if you prefer — may yet prove less than fatal, but we are reminded nonetheless that the unanswered question often reveals more than the answered one.

Kathleen Parker’s email address is kathleenparker@washpost.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence visit the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial in Washington, Jan. 21, 2019. (Sarah Silbiger/The New York Times)
Editorial: What would MLK Jr. do? What, now, will we do?

Monday marks the presidential inauguration and the King holiday, offering guidance on the way forward.

Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial is framed by autumnal colors at the Tidal Basin in Washington, D.C. (Getty Images)
Comment: Defining King’s ‘beloved community’

The term inspired MLK Jr.’s social justice work and persists for others to continue that work.

Paul: Decline in geriatric care a concern not just for seniors

As the population over 65 grows, we’re losing geriatricians to better-paying fields. Yet, there’s hope.

Comment: Trump’s health picks may pose greatest threat to U.S.

What mixed messages from RFK Jr. and others could affect parents’ attitudes about vaccination.

Eco-nomics: A brief history of how the climate crisis unfolded

A review of the facts and dates makes clear that ramping up fossil fuel use takes us in the wrong direction.

Comment: Everett Chamber a dedicated champion for business

A vital city needs the services and support of the return of the Greater Everett Chamber of Commerce.

Why put ‘cognitive hazard’ of fluoride in water?

I received this from Dr. Michael Greger July 15: “Based on new… Continue reading

Reject notion of ‘winnable’ nuclear war

During the 1960s, Pentagon war planners concluded that a successful and winning… Continue reading

?Are wildfires what God or his believes hath wrought?

Astronauts typically express awe and even love for the beautiful Earth below… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Jan. 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Forum: The one thing that AI can’t replicate: our wondrous flaws

Anything that AI produces, such as music, is hollow in its perfection. Flaws breathe life into our work.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.