We need smart laws, not nonsense

Plain and simple I-594 is complete nonsense not common sense. I-594 targets law -biding citizens period, and absolutely nothing to keep criminals from getting guns. The gun shows have self-monitoring rules, such as only members who must pass a background check can buy, sell or possess firearms at said event.

Do some gun owners sell guns to criminals? Yes, it will happen though not often. I-594 has been created by antigun groups hellbent on banning firearms altogether. These people already know this is not going to happen, the next best thing in their minds is to make nonsense laws that criminalize gun ownership. The terminology in I-594 states transfer of firearms, this includes loaning and borrowing to persons that are not barred from gun ownership, such as taking a friend or relative hunting or target shooting, also included are members of law enforcement concerning their backup weapons, needing to borrow or should they have the precinct gunsmith service their weapon, that is a transfer.

I-594 states all transfers be processed threw an Federal Firearms Licensed dealer.

A easy analogy, let’s say automobiles, fitting considering far more people die from auto accidents, if a friend or relative were to borrow your car (even just to drive you to the hospital) would require you to take the auto to a dealership to process a transfer of ownership and the same to take you car back, failure to do so first offense would be a gross misdemeanor followed by a class B Felony.

I-594 will have more people buying more guns and create more criminals. What about those mentally unfit persons, I-594 doesn’t address this problem, unless involuntarily committed, there isn’t anything preventing them from legally purchasing a gun, even when all the warning signs that they are a danger to themselves and others. We need smart laws not nonsense horse dung schemes like I-594.

Greg Reiber


Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Jan. 22

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - In this file photo taken Jan. 6, 2021 at the Capitol in Olympia, Wash., two men stand armed with guns in front of the Governor's Mansion during a protest supporting President Donald Trump and against the counting of electoral votes in Washington, DC, affirming President-elect Joe Biden's victory. The open carry of guns and other weapons would be banned on the Washington state Capitol campus and at or near any public demonstration across Washington under a measure that received a remote public hearing Tuesday, Jan. 26, 2021 by the Senate Law and Justice Committee. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: Protect ballots, meetings from armed intimidation

Two proposed state laws would bar firearms possession at election offices and public meetings.

Dan Hazen
Dan Hazen: Thing about virtues is that one strengthens others

When you start paring away one virtue in favor of another it’s like removing the strands of a net.

Tonya Drake is chancellor of WGU Washington. (Courtesy of WGU)
Tonya Drake: For mentor and mentee, exchange deepens learning

In higher education and after, mentoring offers guidance, encouragement and a fresh perspective.

Harrop: Will we, our kids regret that social media post?

Baby pics on Facebook. TikTok dances. It’s harmless fun now, but will we feel the same years from now?

Comment: Putin counting on the West’s disunity over Ukraine

While the West haggles over definitions and goals, Putin can advance his objectives unchallenged.

Comment: Even building back smaller can still help families

Paring back Build Back Better may now be necessary to win some family and environment programs.

Comment: Harris has plan to help Dreamers; it’s time to use it

With other immigration efforts stalled in the Senate, the Biden administration can take executive action.

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Jan. 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Most Read