World Cup a chance to make soccer — not war

  • Jim Hoagland / Washington Post columnist
  • Wednesday, June 19, 2002 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — Money is the root of evil in French eyes. This is Asia’s century. England reinvents itself every few decades to bound back to a dominant world position. Brazil is history, and future, and always will be.

These are among the allegorical messages being tapped out by the toes of the world’s best soccer players in the game of nations: the World Cup 2002. Even the supposedly unilateralist United States of George W. Bush is finding larger meanings in its sudden success in this supremely multilateral competition of nation-states.

A television audience of 41 million global sports fans has joined spectators in Japan and South Korea this month to watch 32 teams battle toward the June 30 championship match, an ultimate moment of national destiny and glory for the teams that make it through.

Sports and politics do not mix, says conventional wisdom. Men fasten on sports as the safer subject on which to expend conversational testosterone. Sporting contests serve as outlet and as substitute for the open and frequently destructive power struggles of politics.

But conventional wisdom gets it partly wrong again. Pride in victory, like shared grief in defeat, can build and reinforce national character and identity as thoroughly as a call to arms once did in Europe’s crowded landscape. Sport is politics by other means, as Karl von Clausewitz should have said.

The fleet and focused professional athletes who play for their flag — they represent their countries of citizenship rather than of their employment or residence — every four years make the point that nations still count in an era of globalization. Make soccer, not war.

Easy symbolism runs amok in this year’s grand tournament. Quickness, mobility and patience are essential to survival there, as they have been essential in world affairs since Sept. 11. An exceptional crop of goalies makes this year’s play an extended campaign of defensive skills (see U.S. 2, Mexico 0). Homeland security around the net is likely to determine this year’s victor.

Asia rising is another discernible theme. France hosted the glorious 1998 World Cup, won it with Gallic panache and then was unexpectedly eliminated in this year’s first round of play. Co-hosts Japan and South Korea battled through to the second round of play on the strength of their fabled commitments to the work ethic, not on flashiness. Japan was eliminated by Turkey on Tuesday. But the change of locale at least hints at a changing world order.

Here is an Asian conundrum: China, an economic giant with political feet of clay, went home goalless after losing to Costa Rica and Turkey. This undoubtedly had more to say about the 20th century than the 21st. But this could be an interesting omen for a surging but unsteady nation that will host its first Olympics in 2008.

The world turned upside down is another theme that peeks out from the play thus far. In a prophetic 1939 essay about the end of colonialism, George Orwell looked at marching lines of Senegalese troops trained by France to fight the Nazis and asked: "How much longer can we go on kidding these people? How long before they turn their guns in the other direction?"

This year, Senegal turned soccer balls against its former colonial rulers and beat the overconfident French. National gloom deeper than anything the denizens of Mudville ever felt over Casey’s failure at the bat enveloped Paris: The mighty Bleus had stunk the joint up. Victory and the fabulous endorsement contracts it brought the players (many of them from France’s former colonies, too) had gone to their heads, their waistlines and aging legs since 1998, French commentators proclaimed. "Passion for this team made us blind," editorialized Le Monde in deep, moralistic chagrin. France discovered it "is not Brazil, Italy or England," three traditional soccer powerhouses.

A surprisingly uneven Brazilian team made the quarterfinals on the strength of tradition and experience as much as talent. After three decades of underachievement, England moved into the final eight with a strong team displaying speed, flair and an intense hunger for new glory. A glimmer of that same hunger could also be seen in the other Anglo-Saxon contender in the quarterfinals — the United States.

Sports teams at their finest reflect the vitality of their nations’ cultures, languages and ways of life. They not only represent the positive face of nationalism but also help mold it. Increasingly tempted politically to play only in a league of its own, the United States has much to gain from and give to sport’s ultimate game of nations.

Jim Hoagland can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200 or hoaglandj@washpost.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Rivian, based in Irvine, Calif., has introduced its new R2 models, smaller and more affordable SUVs. (Rivian)
Editorial: Open electric vehicle market to direct sales

Legislation would allow EV makers to sell directly to customers, making lease or purchase easier.

Comment: No one saw Musk’s DOGE rampage coming or its threat

With no formal grant of authority, Musk is making cuts without fully understanding the consequences.

Douthat: Trump is chasing off lawyers he’ll need at some point

The deal to clear Adams serves Trump only as a way of identify whom he can consider loyal in the DOJ.

President Donald Trump listens alongside Elon Musk as he explains the administration’s cost-cutting efforts in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, on Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025. Musk has for weeks posted on social media about government spending, often amplifying and seeding false information. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)
Comment: This crisis can’t be left to courts alone

The courts can uphold the law, but they can’t match the speed of the executive branch in tearing down systems.

Eco-nomics: Climate change is making insurance a risky bet

Keeping home insurance affordable amid climate change will take adaptation to threats and broader efforts.

The Buzz: When you gotta boogie, best to shake it off, kid

A pasquidadian review of the week’s news.

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: U.S. and Canada better neighbors than housemates

President Trump may be serious about annexing Canada, but it’s a deal fraught with complexities for all.

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Stick with solutions to homelessness that have heart

A friend of mine, a poet from Leningrad who was born during… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.