Your privacy is an option — someone else’s

The Web site — which posts anonymous gossip about college students and professors by name — boasts that it was “founded on August 1, 2007 with the simple mission of enabling online anonymous free speech on college campuses.” Call it a modern view of free speech — all the privilege and none of the responsibility.

A visit to the Web site yields what you might call the usual anonymous chat room fare — crude language, ethnic slurs and graphic descriptions of probably fictitious sexual encounters. Yawn.

Except that this site encourages its anonymous participants to rate their professors, sorority girls, football players and other students by name. Don’t like your grade? Your advances were rejected? is the perfect venue for payback.

“There is no way for someone using the site to find out who you are,” the site assures users. You can smear others falsely without fear that your true identity will be known.

Some students have tried to fight back. As the San Francisco Chronicle’s Tanya Schevitz reported, UC Berkeley Panhellenic Council President Christina Starzak sagely sent out an e-mail that urged sorority leaders not to use the site. Students at Pepperdine University asked campus administrators to block the site from campus servers, which administrators declined. In a climate that thrives on free speech, censorship won’t do.

“We think the Juicy Campus phenomenon will cycle out and the spectacular nature of it will be its own downfall,” said Pepperdine spokesman Jerry Derloshon.

Me, I’m waiting for a horrific tragedy to happen — followed by a huge lawsuit (or 20) that cuts into the profits of I’ll be rooting for the plaintiff’s attorneys. There have to be some advantages to living in an overly litigious society.

Juicycampus creator Matt Ivester has worked to shield himself from lawsuits. The site tells students that they cannot post lies — but the site does not take down erroneous posts.

“We really aren’t in a position to judge the validity of any given post,” Ivester told The Chronicle in an e-mail. “If we started taking down posts by request, we would be limiting the free speech of our users, and that doesn’t seem right.”

Translation: It costs money to edit the site for accuracy — and that doesn’t seem right. There is money to be made posting anonymous gossip — and that does seem right.

What if you don’t like what someone says about you? What if what they write is false? The site suggests that you consider whether the posting might be considered a matter of opinion, whether it might be true, or whether the posting was “obviously meant to be a joke. Parody is protected by the First Amendment.” If all of the above fail, there’s this: “Finally, remember that you are reading a Web site run by people you don’t know, containing comments made by people you don’t know, concerning events which may or may not have occurred. You should take everything you read with a large grain of salt.”

Bloggers can point to America’s history of anonymous political pamphleteering as precedent for the free speech rights of anonymous words. But Thomas Paine risked execution or jail if his authorship of “Common Sense” had been known — and he did so for principles in which he believed. Not for trash.

As Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, noted, “Gossip and rumors should never be published unless there is evidence.” And: “The truth matters.”

Thanks to the Internet, the last 10 years have passed from providing people with, as the saying went, “too much information” to too much disinformation. Sabato sees a huge cultural change between people of our generation and today’s students: “We view privacy as sacrosanct; they view it as optional.”

It isn’t optional anymore. A trend that started with sites that allow children to post personal information and photos (that may haunt them into adulthood) has been updated. The college version allows other kids to play with other people’s identities — and treat them like a grain of salt.

Debra J. Saunders is a San Francisco Chronicle columnist. Her e-mail address is

Talk to us

More in Opinion

FILE — In this Sept. 17, 2020 file photo, provided by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Chelbee Rosenkrance, of the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, holds a male sockeye salmon at the Eagle Fish Hatchery in Eagle, Idaho. Wildlife officials said Tuesday, Aug. 10, 2021, that an emergency trap-and-truck operation of Idaho-bound endangered sockeye salmon, due to high water temperatures in the Snake and Salomon rivers, netted enough fish at the Granite Dam in eastern Washington, last month, to sustain an elaborate hatchery program. (Travis Brown/Idaho Department of Fish and Game via AP, File)
Editorial: Pledge to honor treaties can save Columbia’s salmon

The Biden administration commits to honoring tribal treaties and preserving the rivers’ benefits.

Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Sept. 30

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Eco-nomics: Climate report card: Needs more effort but shows promise

A UN report shows we’re not on track to meet goals, but there are bright spots with clean energy.

Comment: Child tax credit works against child povery; renew it

After the expanded credit ended in 2021, child poverty doubled. It’s an investment we should make.

Matthew Leger
Forum: Amenian festival shows global reach of vounteers

A Kamiak student helped organize a festival and fundraiser for the people of a troubled region.

Dan Hazen
Forum: Things aren’t OK, boomers; but maybe the kids are

Older generations wrote the rules to fit their desires, but maybe there’s hope in their grandchildren.

Comment:Transition to clean energy isn’t moving quickly enough

Solar energy and EV sales are booming but we have a long way to go to come near our global warming goal.

Patricia Gambis, right, talks with her 4-year-old twin children, Emma, left, and Etienne in their home, Thursday, Jan. 24, 2019, in Maplewood, N.J. Gambis' husband, an FBI agent, has been working without pay during the partial United States government shutdown, which has forced the couple to take financial decisions including laying off their babysitter. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez)
Editorial: Shutdown hits kids, families at difficult moment

The shutdown risks food aid for low-income families as child poverty doubled last year and child care aid ends.

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Sept. 29

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Most Read