Heraldnet.com
WEDNESDAY, JULY 23, 2008 9:15 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Herald Editorial Board

Bob Bolerjack,
Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson,
Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@
heraldnet.com


Allen Funk,
Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

Kim Heltne,
Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com

Rikki King,
Editorial Page Intern
rking@heraldnet.com

Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Tuesday


Sauk River will run its course again
Heroin blamed in Mukilteo teen's death
Monroe motorcyclist dies in U.S. 2 crash
Monday


Suspects in Monroe burglary found sleeping on b...
Sounder fills up with new riders
Look for Camano Island actress, 16, on Broadway
Sunday


A life interrupted
Everett composting company ordered to track dow...
WASL questions dominate at forum
Saturday


Marysville teen to race as Olympian for the Mar...
Teen burglar can't run forever, police say
New branch campus in Snohomish County doesn't a...
Friday


Vandals cause $12,000 damage at Evergreen Cemet...
Everett's study on Paine Field air service chan...
Two jailed suspects may be involved in dozens o...
Thursday


Cheers, fears as AM radio towers rise in Snohomish
Study backs Paine Field passenger service
How county residents are dealing with the economy
Wednesday


19 years for Everett murder some relief for vic...
Warm Beach: Loophole clears way for 27 duplexes
Young Iraqi in Snohomish makes his case to stay...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
HAVE YOUR SAY
Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor.
You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another.
Send it to:
E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206
Fax: 425-339-3458
Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).
 
Published: Wednesday, October 4, 2006

Vibrant democracy requires parties that actually compete

A common theme in a democracy is "one person, one vote." But what happens when most people sit out an election? Do you still have a democracy? What happens when only one candidate is running for an office? Does that make for a democratic choice?

I am not referring to the one-party elections of the Soviet Union, or the boycotted elections held last year in Iran. I am considering the primary election in our own state held just two weeks ago.

Here are some sobering facts about this election. Three out of four adults didn't even bother to cast a ballot. So just one quarter of Washington's voting-age population decided who would be the major party candidates for the November showdown. Except that really wasn't the case in 30 percent of the seats for the Legislature.

In 39 seats out of 124, only one party filed a candidate. So when the people get around to voting in the November election, several hundred thousand won't even have a choice for legislative candidates.

If you live in Edmonds, Lynnwood or Mukilteo, you can vote for Paull Shin (D) for Senate, Mary Helen Roberts (D) for Representative Position 1 and Brian Sullivan (D) for Representative Position 2. Or don't vote; it won't make a difference. Other examples abound.

National commentators have pointed out how Democrats and Republicans have ceded states to each other - the Democrats have given up on the South, the Republicans have written off New England - and this leads to a few key states as the battlegrounds for control of Congress and the presidency. We have our own version of this in Washington, with the Democrats all but giving up on Eastern Washington and the Republicans steadily pulling away from Seattle and its suburbs, leaving only a handful of districts with real contests.

Both parties benefit from this status quo, because it enables them to target their resources in a limited number of races, knowing that their candidates are either shoo-ins or else hopeless or nonexistent in other districts.

One might think that every 10 years this comfortable calculus would be broken up by redistricting and a new slicing and dicing of the districts. In our state, we have avoided the partisan battles of redistricting because we have a bipartisan redistricting commission, with both parties evenly represented.

But what this has led to is redistricting that focuses primarily on incumbency protection for both parties. This reinforces the diminishing choice for voters when it comes to whom they can vote for in November. The two parties enjoy a shared monopoly on candidate selection, which translates for many of us into a one-party "democratic" choice.

This monopoly on candidates extends down into county government. In Clallam County (Port Angeles and Sequim), no Democrat is running for prosecuting attorney and no Republican is running for county commissioner in District 3.

In Snohomish County, no Republican candidate is running for prosecuting attorney. In Benton County, no Democrats filed for county assessor, county auditor, county clerk, county commissioner in District 2, county sheriff or county treasurer.

Pierce County is especially free of voter choice. No Republican is running for prosecuting attorney or for County Council District 5. No Democrat is running in District 7. And in County Council District 1, where Shawn Bunney (R) won with less than 48 percent of the vote in 2002, the Democrats don't even have a candidate this year.

This Democrat-Republican duopoly is not good for democracy. Not only does it limit our choice, it also creates an incentive for each party to reinforce the status quo. Politics becomes devoted to holding onto or slightly increasing partisan majorities. Policy is decided by who has money for campaigns, how they can be brought into a winning coalition, who not to offend and what little steps are necessary to keep supporters on board.

Is it any surprise that voters recycle their absentee ballots instead of taking the time to mark them? When the races are already decided, why bother?

John Burbank, executive director of the Economic Opportunity Institute (www.eoionline.org), writes every other Wednesday. Write to him in care of the institute at 1900 Northlake Way, Suite 237, Seattle, WA 98103. His e-mail address is john@eoionline.org.

1. Heroin blamed in Mukilteo teen's death
2. Monroe motorcyclist dies in U.S. 2 crash
3. Local Briefly: Lynnwood woman killed in accident named
4. First a bus, now a boat for Gregoire
5. It's too spendy to stay on in Everett, dog trainer decides
6. Elite rower finds herself without a country
7. Sauk River will run its course again
8. Snohomish County lawyers rate candidates for Superior Court judge
9. They don't have any claim to 'rights'
10. Fair season begins this weekend in Silvana
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Fewer sports fields could go into Hamlin Park
Taxpayers to Stevens' rescue?
Terrace hires new police chief
Torched!: Three fires blamed on weed torches
A SuperSonics' original: LFP's Henry Akin
Juveniles arrested in burglary spree
Fire levy put to a vote
Late rally, trick play gets Vikings victory
Senior housing on way to Lynnwood
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT